www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

The dark side of voting in elections

By Dambisa Moyo | China Daily | Updated: 2017-06-23 07:09
Share
Share - WeChat

A voter wears a shirt with words from the United States Constitution while casting his ballot early as long lines of voters vote at the San Diego County Elections Office in San Diego, California, US, November 7, 2016. [Photo/Agencies]

 

According to an unpublished "kitchen table survey", conducted before last November's presidential election in the United States, about 95 percent of the predominantly Hispanic members of one of the US' largest domestic unions preferred Democratic Party candidate Hillary Clinton to her Republican opponent Donald Trump. Yet less than 3 percent of that union's members actually planned to vote. The reason came down to economics.

For most of the people surveyed, the costs of voting-including lost wages from time off work, transport to the polling station and the need to secure proper identification (such as a driver's license or passport)-were simply too high. This reflects a broader trend in the US, with poor people often unable to participate fully in their country's democracy.

According to the US Census Bureau, fewer than half of eligible adults with family incomes of less than $20,000 a year voted in the 2012 presidential election, whereas voter participation among households with incomes of more than $75,000 a year was 77 percent. In the 2014 midterm election, the think tank Demos reports, 68.5 percent of people in households earning less than $30,000 a year didn't vote.

This is a serious problem. But the proposals most often put forward to address it have serious drawbacks.

The proposed solutions typically focus on digital technology, which many claim would boost voter participation, by lowering the costs of voting. For example, mobile apps have been touted as a means to boost voter turnout: people could vote at their convenience, whether in the break-room at work or from the comfort of their own home.

The idea certainly sounds appealing. In Estonia, which is widely considered to be a leader in the use of voting technology, almost 25 percent of all votes in the 2011 parliamentary election were cast online.

Yet the actual impact of such technology on voter participation remains dubious.

Although the rate of online voting in Estonia increased by nearly 20 percent between the 2007 and 2011 elections, overall voter turnout increased by less than 2 percentage points (from 61.9 percent to 63.5 percent). This suggests online voting may simply prompt regular voters to change how they cast their ballots, rather than encouraging additional voters to participate.

But voting technology may not just be ineffective; it could actually be damaging. Such technology doesn't reduce costs only for voters; it also reduces costs for the state, making it easier than ever to conduct elections. The risk is that lower costs would encourage more frequent elections and referendums, thereby undermining the efficiency of government.

At a time of lackluster global economic growth and deteriorating living standards for many, efficient government could not be more important. According to the US Millennium Challenge Corporation, an efficient government helps to reduce poverty, improve education and healthcare, slow environmental degradation, and combat corruption.

A key feature of an efficient government is long-term thinking. Policymakers must work toward the policy goals that got them elected. But they must also be given enough political room to adjust to new developments, even if it means altering policy timelines.

Amid constant elections and referenda, that, however, isn't really an option. Instead, policymakers face strong pressure to deliver short-term, voter-pleasing results-or get punished at the polls. The likely result is a shortsighted agenda prone to sudden politically motivated reversals. Beyond hurting political credibility and market confidence, such volatility could create friction between elected politicians and civil-service technocrats, damaging a relationship that is critical to efficient, forward-looking, and fact-based decision-making.

Proponents of referendums hold them up as the epitome of democracy, giving ordinary citizens a direct say in specific policy decisions. But, in a representative democracy, referendums undermine the relationship between the voters and their political leaders, who have been entrusted to make policy on behalf of citizens.

Ominously, referendums are already becoming an increasingly common-and consequential-feature of policymaking in the West. The United Kingdom has held just three referendums in its entire history, but two were held just in the last six years (plus another in Scotland).

Elections, too, are becoming more frequent. The average tenure of a G20 political leader has fallen to a record low of 3.7 years, compared to six years in 1946-a shift that, no doubt, is contributing to a rise in short-term thinking by governments.

It is not yet clear whether voting technology actually does spur greater voter participation. What is clear is that, if it is adopted widely, it could exacerbate trends that are undermining public policy, including governments' ability to boost economic growth and improve social outcomes.

Reducing barriers to democratic participation for the poorest citizens is a worthy goal. But what good will achieving it do if those citizens' interests are harmed as a result?

The author, an economist and author, sits on the board of directors of a number of global corporations.

Project Syndicate

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 97视频久久 | 欧美一级特黄aa大片视频 | 午夜伦4480yy妇女久久久 | 久久视屏这里只有精品6国产 | 日本不卡一区在线 | 国产第一草草影院 | 久久高清一区二区三区 | 亚洲精品人成在线观看 | 成 人免费va视频 | 欧美色视频在线观看 | 日日噜噜噜夜夜爽爽狠狠69 | 欧美孕妇性xxxⅹ精品hd | 免费看成人毛片日本久久 | aaa一级毛片 | 成人精品免费视频 | 91精品日本久久久久久牛牛 | 国产亚洲欧美在线人成aaaa | 国产精品成人aaaaa网站 | 欧美69视频 | 国产高清厕所盗摄视频 | 精品久久免费观看 | 日本免费一区二区三区三州 | 男人女人做刺激视频免费 | 91热久久 | 亚洲天堂毛片 | 色视频网站大全免费 | 亚洲精品日韩在线一区 | 成人网免费看 | 中文字幕成人免费高清在线 | 女人张开腿给人桶免费视频 | 久久无码精品一区二区三区 | 一级毛片不卡片免费观看 | 在线亚洲日产一区二区 | 日本三级香港三级人妇99视 | 欧美一级片网址 | 精品视频在线免费播放 | 欧美性色生活片免费播放 | 欧美韩国日本 | 黄色毛片视频校园交易 | jizzjizz成熟丰满舒服 | 亚洲综合伦理一区 |