www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Readers

Why space program needs cooperation of all countries

By Robert Lackman | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2018-01-11 11:14
Share
Share - WeChat

The opinions expressed here are those of the writer and do not represent the views of China Daily and China Daily website.

Commander John Young, America’s most experienced astronaut, died at age 87 on Jan 7, 2018. He both walked on the moon and flew the first mission of the Space Shuttle. Young said about NASA's mission, "NASA is not about the 'Adventure of Human Space Exploration,' we are in the deadly serious business of saving the species. All Human Exploration's bottom line is about preserving our species over the long haul."

Matthew Husband, whose father flew as commander of Columbia space shuttle that Young first commanded, realized the danger of his dad’s profession on Feb 1, 2003.

His father died when the Columbia broke up during reentry in February 2003. Matthew didn’t realize his dad had a dangerous job. His father had tried to shield both his children from knowing how dangerous his job was.

He was told during his astronaut candidate interview that each shuttle launch had a 1 in 100 chance of killing its astronauts.

John Young’s fellow Gemini crewmate Gus Grissom and two other astronauts perished in the Apollo 1 fire caused by faulty wiring.

Young and Grissom both knew the wiring had troubles but were afraid to bring it up for fear of losing their jobs. After the Apollo 1 astronauts’ needless deaths, Young vowed to never again be silent about safety issues.

This dangerous nature of space travel makes me think the US law prohibiting NASA from cooperating with the Chinese space program is very short sighted.

Cooperation is needed now if our countries are to successfully work together later. Cooperation may someday be needed to rescue either of our countries space voyagers from deadly peril.

The folly of incompatible hardware from different organizations was demonstrated during the Apollo 13.

When the service module exploded as they were approaching the moon, the crew of three was forced to abandon the command module and use the lunar module as a lifeboat. They did make it home alive.

The astronauts, however, nearly died returning to earth because the carbon dioxide scrubbers for the command module were incompatible with the carbon dioxide scrubber sockets for the Lunar Excursion Module’s carbon dioxide scrubbers.

The two separate companies that had made the command module and lunar modules had not thought to cooperate on a common design for their carbon dioxide scrubbers. Fortunately, NASA engineers on the ground figured out how to give instructions to the astronauts enabling them to jury-rig a solution that allowed the lunar module to use the command module scrubbers.

If the two separate contractors who made the command and lunar modules had cooperated more, this near-fatal problem would not have occurred.

Software cooperation is even more complicated than hardware cooperation. One of my IBM mangers was in command of making sure that IBM’s space shuttle software modules worked together correctly. He was responsible for the software that controlled the space shuttle until 70 seconds before liftoff. Steve Szabo used a very expensive software technique called formal methods to prove there were no bugs in the software, since any software bug could blow up the space shuttle.

The official NASA investigation says a rescue of the Columbia astronauts from their damaged space was possible by a shuttle being prepared for launch in the next mission.

However, NASA ignored its engineers who feared the Columbia’s heat shield had been damaged by an impact by falling fuel tank insulation at lift off. The engineers arranged for a spy satellite to take pictures of the Columbia, but the managers called the military to cancel such a picture taking. Part of the NASA management’s reasoning was thinking if the heat shield was damaged the astronauts were as good as dead and no rescue was possible.

Maybe if US did not have a vehicle that could rescue the crippled Columbia, China or Russia could have been invited to rescue them. However, a lot of it depends upon previous experience of cooperation together. Astronauts may needlessly die if our respective countries cannot cooperate in an unforeseen emergency. Do I think that Rick Husband and the other 16 US astronauts who have died in the US space program were foolish to put themselves in such a great danger? I don’t think so. They died as heroes that took a calculated risk with their lives in order to serve the human race. From age 4, Husband wanted to be an astronaut. He knew the dangers of space, but thought being an astronaut was a way to serve mankind.

As China's space program develops, chances of accidents happening increase. All space programs need to be shielded from political pressure.

The first space voyager Yuri Gagarin reportedly made plans to confront Soviet Communist party secretary Brezhnev in person about the decision to launch the Soyuz mission prematurely that killed his fellow cosmonaut Vladimir Komarov. Gagarin died in an airplane crash before any confrontation took place. There was pressure to launch early in order to celebrate international solidarity day.

The US ban on cooperation with China no doubt comes from political pressure.

As Nobel laureate Richard Feynman said, “For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled."

Feynman is famous for blowing the whistle on NASA management who had had been trying to hide their guilt in the Challenger space shuttle disaster.

Feynman knew that the night before the launch the engineers had pleaded with NASA management not to launch the shuttle, predicting correctly that because of the unusually cold weather, the solid rocket O-rings would freeze, causing the space shuttle to explode. Because of the political pressure to stick to their aggressive launch schedule the engineers were ignored, and all died when the Challenger exploded. I have vivid memories of my shock when in January 1986 veteran IBMer Gordon Kerr walked by my office in Boca Raton, Florida, and popping his head in told me the Challenger had exploded. Like the astronauts Gordon had stared death in the face for the good of his country. In his case it was when he crossed the Atlantic in a troop ship convoy being hunted like sheep by German World War 2 U-boats.

Astronauts are taking calculated risks to serve the people. Someday, we made need our astronauts to rescue our world.

Since, as John Young eloquently articulated, the purpose of space exploration is to protect the human race, the least the human race can do is try to work together to make sure these brave people do not needlessly perish.

The author has taught at schools in Qingdao since leaving IBM in 1998.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲国产精品一区二区首页 | 萌白酱香蕉白丝护士服喷浆 | 亚洲一区二区三区福利在线 | 日本免费二区三区久久 | 国产在线爱做人成小视频 | 99精品国产兔费观看久久99 | 亚洲一区2区三区4区5区 | 日韩一区二区久久久久久 | 国产精品99 | 国产精品福利视频萌白酱 | 亚洲另类视频 | 日本韩国欧美在线观看 | 亚洲一区欧洲一区 | 国产欧美一区二区三区沐欲 | 亚洲成a人v大片在线观看 | 在线视频日本 | 久久在线视频免费观看 | 亚洲欧美精品久久 | 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区久久 | 久久久精品成人免费看 | 日本免费观看的视频在线 | 性色网址 | 久久99国产精品久久欧美 | 国产一区二区三区不卡免费观看 | 99re热视频 | 国产成人丝袜视频在线视频 | 日韩精品一区二区三区免费视频 | 国产一级特黄全黄毛片 | 久久亚洲精品成人综合 | 一级片日韩| www.欧美成人 | 精品视频 九九九 | 成人精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲乱淫| 一级毛片日韩a欧美 | 免费看黄色的网址 | 2019偷偷狠狠的日日 | 免费人成在线观看网站视频 | 亚洲精品专区一区二区欧美 | 精品久久久中文字幕一区 | 久久精品久久精品久久 |