久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Property curbs working to potential

By Yang Zhiyong | Yang Zhiyong | Updated: 2018-01-22 06:53
Share
Share - WeChat
LI MIN / CHINA DAILY

Lanzhou, capital of Northwest China's Gansu province, has reportedly eased the property tightening policy in some of its districts despite local authorities' denial previously, raising public concerns that such measures could be eased nationwide.

If the authorities impose property tightening measures in areas where real estate transactions are not very high, the measures, instead of curbing housing prices, might have a negative impact on even genuine homebuyers as opposed to speculators. The Lanzhou authorities have eased the restrictions on housing purchase policy only in those districts where few people buy houses, not in the areas where the demand for property is high.

The restrictions were imposed to curb soaring housing prices. So they should be lifted after the rise in housing prices is curbed, or declines. In major cities where the housing demand still exceeds supply, the tightening policy continues to be in force.

Ensuring every household's demand for housing is met and people's livelihoods are improved are among the principal goals of the government. And since people's living conditions will improve in accordance with the increase in their incomes, the establishment of a multiple housing supply system would satisfy the demands of people of different income levels.

China is exploring a joint-property rights housing system and a developed rental housing market to meet the housing demand of the households that cannot afford to pay for commercial housing. Since housing is for living in, not speculation, it is not necessary for everyone, especially those with limited purchasing power, to buy commercial housing if joint-property rights housing can meet their residential need.

Given that incomes are increasing at a much slower pace than housing price rise, it doesn't make sense for everyone to purchase commercial housing just to enjoy total property rights. If the rental housing market is developed and enough houses are offered on lease, they can satisfy many people's residential need. As such, joint-property rights housing and rental housing could partly reduce people's demand for commercial housing, and thus help curb the soaring housing prices.

Of course, the real estate market should be regulated. But commercial housing should continue playing a major role in the housing market. Some people argue that China should take a page or two out of Singapore's housing system, which provides affordable housing including joint-property rights housing for a majority of its citizens, to streamline its housing market. But that would mean the government shouldering the responsibility for housing supply.

Instead, what we need is sufficient supply of affordable housing. In market economy, the market should play a crucial role in resource distribution, which means the market should decide housing supply. During special periods, however, the government could play a greater role in housing supply. For instance, when the housing price to income ratio is extremely unreasonable, the government should help meet a part of the housing demand.

A normal market, including the housing market, should use purchase-restriction policies as little as possible, because they restrict the market from playing its due role. After the basic residential demand is met, the market should be allowed to play a leading role in meeting the demands for better, even luxury, housing. And for the mid-to high-end housing demands, purchase restrictions are not only unnecessary; they could also distort the market.
Socialism with Chinese characteristics has stepped into a new era, and the principal contradiction has evolved to be that between "unbalanced and inadequate development and the people's ever-growing needs for a better life". The demand for mid-to high-end housing should be seen as a demand for a better life.

The housing market reform is vital to sustainable and healthy economic growth, but to achieve the essential goal of property tightening measures and to end housing speculation, the authorities should also expand housing supply.

The author is a research fellow at the National Academy of Economic Strategy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 性盈盈影院67194 | 日本在线观看一级高清片 | 欧美专区视频 | 国内自拍第一页 | 国产区精品一区二区不卡中文 | 亚洲性视频网站 | 久久国产免费一区二区三区 | 加勒比一区在线 | 韩国欧洲一级毛片 | 国产精品系列在线一区 | 91精品国产综合久久久久久 | 国美女福利视频午夜精品 | 成人欧美精品大91在线 | 国产精品日本一区二区在线播放 | 日韩欧美一区二区三区久久 | 国产精品免费一区二区三区四区 | 欧美日韩久久 | 国产α片| 日本xxxxx黄区免费看动漫 | 亚洲精品高清国产麻豆专区 | 成年人黄色免费网站 | 国产99视频精品一区 | 高清国产露脸捆绑01经典 | 成人交性视频免费看 | 成人18免费观看的软件 | 国产成人精品区在线观看 | 国产成人精品一区 | 免费成年网 | 国产视频自拍一区 | 中文字幕久久久 | 最新理论三级中文在线观看 | 99久久香蕉国产线看观香 | 中文字幕亚洲综合久久 | 久国产| 尹人香蕉久久99天天拍 | 久久精品国产精品亚洲综合 | 中文字幕有码在线播放 | 91精品国产91久久久久久 | www.99在线观看| 欧美成人免费大片888 | 欧美大尺度aaa级毛片 |