久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / Americas

Trump's steel tariff plan called disruptive

By Chen Weihua in Washington | China Daily USA | Updated: 2018-03-02 23:26
Share
Share - WeChat

US President Donald Trump's announcement on Thursday of tariffs on imported steel and aluminum has sparked concerns about a potential trade war, a disruption of the global trading system and harm to the US economy.

Trump said he will sign measures next week for the United States to impose tariffs of 25 percent on steel imports and 10 percent on aluminum imports "for a long period of time".

"We're going to build our steel industry back and our aluminum industry back," he said.

Trump announced the tariffs during a hastily arranged meeting in the White House with steel and aluminum executives, and the timing of the announcement surprised Wall Street. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 420 points, or 1.68 percent, with analysts saying investors fear retaliation by other countries and higher inflation.

The New York Times reported that Trump also said on Thursday that he did not want any nation to be exempted from the order.

Some US allies, including Canada, Japan and South Korea, are among the 10 biggest sources of steel for the US. China is the 11th biggest exporter to the US, accounting for 2 percent of US steel imports. And China is the third largest aluminum exporter to the US.

Canada and the European Union and others have already vowed to retaliate against the US tariffs, a decision based on an investigation under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act of 1962 that found steel and aluminum imports pose a national security threat to the US.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said in Beijing on Thursday that the US' "unreasonable and excessive" use of trade remedy measures will not help revitalize relevant industries at home, but rather, it will affect its employment and jeopardize the welfare of American consumers.

"China will take necessary measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests," she said.

The Ministry of Commerce made similar comment on Feb 17 following a US Commerce Department report of the Section 232 investigation.

Gary Hufbauer, a nonresident senior fellow at the Washington-based Peterson Institute for International Economics, said the tariffs were "a sad day for trade policy".

He said that Trump has decided to cite national security as the rationale for protecting US steel and aluminum industries with the tariffs, but that "foreign suppliers and US downstream users see the national security justification as baloney, just pure protection".

"The Trump administration may eventually grant exemptions to select foreign suppliers, possibly as a bargaining chip for their concessions on other issues. However, the EU and China, at least, will retaliate in the near future. They may invoke national security concerns as well," said Hufbauer, who served as deputy assistant secretary for international trade and investment policy of the US Treasury from 1977 to 1979.

Wayne Morrison, a specialist in Asia trade and finance at the Congressional Research Services, described the tariffs on national security ground as "unfortunate" and "opens up a Pandora's box".

He cited that US domestic industries facing foreign competition likely will make the same argument to seek protection, and the US downstream industries that use these products will suffer high costs and become less competitive.

"Industry and labor representatives in other countries might push for their own national security-related protectionist policies, which ultimately could hurt US exporters and reduce jobs," Morrison said.

Steve Suranovic of the Department of Economics at George Washington University said: "A trade war could develop that could begin to undermine many countries' faith in the liberalizing institutions like the WTO (World Trade Organization). If trust in the WTO system failed, the world could be heading to a repeat of the high tariff period of the Great Depression in the 1930s.

"My guess is that other countries would begin by filing a WTO dispute against the US. If that were to fail, and if protectionist US policies spread further, we might see a breakdown of the multilateral agreements and a resultant trade war. But this is likely down the road," Gene Grossman of the Department of Economics at Princeton University said in an email.

Charles Kane of the Sloan School of Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology said it's likely that American steel manufacturers will raise their own prices. Job increases will be minimal and "there will be job decreases down the supply chain where steel is being provided".

Grossman said that "tariffs on imported steel will raise the domestic price of all steel in the US, imported or not. Any industry that relies on steel as an input will see an increase in costs. The automobile industry is one example, the aircraft industry is another."

On Thursday, shares of Ford Motor Co fell 3 percent and General Motors Co declined by nearly 4 percent. Boeing, Caterpillar and other users of steel and aluminum also brought down the market, while steel producers US Steel and AK Steel posted big gains.

"We are not protectionists. We want a level playing field," said David Burritt, president and CEO of US Steel. "And when we get this right, it will be great for the United States of America."

Experts believed that US agricultural, airplane and auto exports could be the easy targets if China chooses to retaliate.

Many US lawmakers have described the tariffs as a tax on US consumers, just like the US tariffs on solar panels and machines announced in January.

Kansas Senator Pat Roberts, the Republican chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, on Thursday described Trump's announcement as "not going to go down well in farm country".

He expressed that he and other Republican senators received no formal heads-up from the White House before Trump said he would impose import tariffs.

"What's really ironic here — it's a real paradox of irony — that we have a tax reform package that's bringing a lot of benefits to the business community not the mention individuals, and this is a policy move that is contrary to that," Roberts was quoted by the newspaper Kansas City Star.

Paul Welitzkin in New York contributed to this story.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 女人毛片a毛片久久人人 | 久久久久久88色愉愉 | 欧美三级成人观看 | 一级做a爱过程免费观看 | 亚洲精品视频免费 | 精品欧美亚洲韩国日本久久 | 超清首页 国产 亚洲 丝袜 | 成人亚洲国产 | 久久91视频 | 欧美又粗又硬又大久久久 | 91人碰| 视频精品一区二区 | 性欧美美国级毛片 | 日本午夜精品 | 神马我我不卡伦影视 | 真人一级一级特黄高清毛片 | 97影院在线午夜 | 97视频在线看 | 在线视频第一页 | 久章草在线视频 | 国产男女爽爽爽免费视频 | 91欧美在线视频 | 深夜福利视频在线看免费 | 成人97 | 一级毛片不卡免费看老司机 | 男人和女人搞黄 | 国产精品变态重口在线 | 俄罗斯黄色毛片 | 手机毛片在线观看 | 日本a级三级三级三级久久 日本a级特黄三级三级三级 | 欧美日韩一区二区三区在线播放 | 99国产精品热久久久久久夜夜嗨 | 韩国日本三级在线观看 | 一级片aaaa | 久久国产精品久久国产精品 | 免费国产成人高清在线观看不卡 | 欧美国产高清欧美 | 久久精品国产99久久6动漫欧 | 亚洲天堂网在线视频 | a级淫片 | 国产一二三区在线观看 |