www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
China
Home / China / HK Macao

HK must hold the line, uphold democracy in elections

By Grenville Cross | China Daily Global | Updated: 2019-11-08 09:17
Share
Share - WeChat
District Council election candidates and members of Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong, New People’s Party, Business and Professionals Alliance for Hong Kong and Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions rally at the Central Government Complex in Admiralty on Thursday, condemning violence and calling for fair election. Photos by China Daily

"Deliberate violence", said the Greek philosopher Heraclitus, "is more to be quenched than a fire."

Although Hong Kong elections have traditionally been relatively peaceful affairs, this has now changed. After the anti-extradition protests morphed into urban guerrilla warfare, every institution is now at risk. A culture of violence has now taken hold, buttressed by a willingness to use crude intimidation of others, whether in politics, the universities, or on the streets.

The latest victim of this phenomenon is legislator Junius Ho Kwan-yiu. Out campaigning for a District Council seat in Tuen Mun, he was stabbed in the chest by a stranger. The crime was obviously pre-meditated, and the suspected offender will hopefully be charged with attempted murder.

Shortly before the attack, Ho's local office had been hit by fire bombs.

According to Starry Lee Waiking, chairwoman of the Democratic Alliance for the Development and Betterment of Hong Kong (DAB), there have been 150 incidents of DAB candidates being harassed and their offices vandalized in the last month alone.

Quite clearly, those opposed to the pro-government candidates want to intimidate them, but why? They may hope that they will drop out of the elections altogether, thus clearing the way for their opponents.

Alternatively, they may want the government to cancel the elections, thereby attracting censure, both locally and internationally, and this seems more likely.

As the November 24 election date approaches, the levels of violence could well increase. If fanatics are prepared to firebomb the offices of particular candidates, can the Electoral Affairs Commission (EAC) be sure that they will not also attack the polling booths? Undoubtedly, the safety of the voting public must be the first priority.

The police force, therefore, stretched as they are, must carry out a risk assessment, together with a review of their capacity to protect the polling stations from possible attack. Given that the polling day is on a Sunday, the day the greatest outrages often occur, that assessment will need to embrace the likelihood of road obstructions and train service cancellations, as these will impact directly on the ability of people to vote.

In this exercise, the role of the EAC, which is chaired by a high court judge, Barnabus Fung Wah, will be pivotal. Under the Electoral Affairs Commission Ordinance (Cap 541), the EAC is charged with ensuring that elections are conducted "openly, fairly and honestly" (section 4). If, however, the levels of violence and intimidation, whether actual or anticipated, are such that Fung concludes an election which satisfies those criteria is no longer possible, he must frankly advise the government.

He is, of course, a wholly neutral figure, and nobody can accuse the EAC of bias. Indeed, its Ordinance specifically states that the EAC "shall not be regarded as a servant or agent of the government" (Section 15).

If, therefore, some candidates cannot campaign, because of violence, or some electors cannot vote, because of fear or disruptions to transport, or both, the integrity of the elections, were they to proceed, would have been fatally compromised.

The cancellation of the elections must, however, be a last resort. It would be a victory for the fanatics and their violent methods, and a blow to our democratic processes.

All those candidates, moreover, who have been intimidated and attacked for their political beliefs are also entitled to know their efforts have not been in vain, and that the electors, not the men of violence, will have the final say on November 24.

The author is a senior counsel, law professor and criminal justice analyst, and was previously the director of public prosecutions of Hong Kong. The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 日本一级大毛片a一 | 在线一区国产 | 国产高清一区二区三区视频 | 成人精品网 | 中国japanesevideo乱 | 免费看一级毛片欧美 | 国产成人在线观看免费网站 | 中国一级做a爱片免费 | cao草棚视频网址成人 | 精品一区二区三区在线视频观看 | 中文字幕精品一区二区三区视频 | 成人毛片网站 | 久久精品一区二区三区中文字幕 | 亚洲精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲一区二区影视 | 精品国产不卡一区二区三区 | 欧美一区二区三区男人的天堂 | 久久99国产精品一区二区 | 国产精品青草久久福利不卡 | 欧美多人三级级视频播放 | 99久久免费国产香蕉麻豆 | 美女张开腿让我桶 | 亚洲免费视频在线 | 日韩一区二区三区视频 | 男女视频免费看 | 亚洲精品视频免费看 | 国产成人高清一区二区私人 | 国产精品久久久99 | 手机看片久久高清国产日韩 | 精品国产高清在线看国产 | 在线视免费频观看韩国aaa | 久久精品国产只有精品2020 | 国产精品特级毛片一区二区三区 | 亚洲日本在线看片 | 国产成人精品午夜视频' | 亚洲在线偷拍自拍 | 日韩精品一区二区三区免费观看 | 悟空影视大全免费高清 | 99久久九九| 免费播放特黄特色毛片 | 国产精选莉莉私人影院 |