久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
World
Home / World / Americas

Deep rifts in US color views on foreign policy

By YIFAN XU in Washington | China Daily | Updated: 2022-03-23 09:15
Share
Share - WeChat

Extreme positions, fanned by social media, driving debate, forums hear

People walk on Times Square in New York, the United States, Nov 23, 2021.[Photo/Xinhua]

The deep political divisions among people in the United States are spilling over into the nation's foreign policy, according to participants at recent forums that also blamed social media for amplifying the polarization in society.

Erol Yayboke, director of the Center for Strategic & International Studies Project on Fragility and Mobility, introduced a report titled Softening Sharp Divides: Foreign Policy in an Era of Domestic Division at a webinar on March 7. The webinar, titled Global Security Forum 2021, was hosted by the CSIS.

He said the report shows "that domestic dividers extend beyond partisan politics" and "that the US citizens see foreign policy through lenses that differ greatly depending on socioeconomic status, age, rural versus urban location, and race".

Yayboke added: "We can certainly see over the past several years in the US there are examples of divisions within the US. We certainly saw it on and around and after Jan 6 (the Capitol riot). We saw it around and following the protests regarding the death of George Floyd. We've seen it in other ways, including around elections in the US."

He also noted that one of his findings in the paper was that the public is more divided than policy experts.

During workshop discussions, the experts acknowledged that more extreme positions among the public could sometimes drive the debate.

"While only 2 percent of workshop participants self-identified with the extreme ends of the political spectrum, 41 percent of public respondents identified as such," said Yayboke.

Mike Green, senior vice-president for Asia at the CSIS, said that the debate over China policy, however, is less populist and takes place more in the private sector, specifically Silicon Valley and Wall Street, and within the national security community.

"Those are big divisions and there are a lot of corporate boards that think it is crazy to even imagine decoupling technology from China at all," Green said. "We did a survey a year and a half ago at CSIS of the Chamber of Commerce and others, and there are a lot of different views.

"They are not monolithic, but a lot of big corporations in northwest California and New York do not want to get on side with the strategic competition with China, do not want to decouple, do not want to divest, do not want to limit technology except a little bit.

"But … by the same token, many people in the national security space don't understand what corporations do, don't understand profits, don't understand …responsibilities to shareholders. And that's the divide in the strategic competition with China."

William Cohen, a former US secretary of defense who also served in the Senate and the House of Representatives, described the current era as one of "crudeness, crudity, and coarseness".

At another Washington think tank event on March 9, Alex Johnson, deputy director of US Foreign Policy-US Programs at Open Society Foundations, highlighted the role that social media platforms play in political divisions.

In the symposium titled A Look at America's Policy Challenges for the Next Decade held by the Atlantic Council, Johnson said: "Algorithms and content moderation on some platforms have yielded increased asymmetry in hate speech.

"Are our tech platforms meeting their obligations to society in terms of countering hate speech, misinformation and disinformation? Are those efforts the same across different markets, languages and geographies?" Johnson asked.

"How hate speech is treated must be consistent, or those who seek to do harm will adapt and find other opportunities. Also, as digital spaces are segregated by AI, how are we preventing hate speech and the coordination of hate-motivated crimes?" he said.

"As long as the business model for tech platforms is to target audiences and individuals with distinct and identifiable data, that model can be corrupted by state and non-state actors to nefarious ends."

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品韩国主播福利视频在线观看一 | 成 人 在 线 免费 8888 www | 久久精品免视国产 | 日韩久久久精品首页 | 三级网站视频在线观看 | 国产综合久久一区二区三区 | 成人爱爱网站在线观看 | 美女张开腿给男人捅 | 日本a一级片 | 欧美激情精品久久久久 | 男女午夜视频在线观看 | 国产一级一片免费播放i | 精品国产91久久久久 | 99在线观看视频免费 | 五月久久亚洲七七综合中文网 | 亚洲综合黄色 | 性国产精品| 男人干女人逼 | 亚洲图片 自拍偷拍 | 欧美成年视频 | 欧美日韩视频在线第一区二区三区 | 国产精品亚洲精品影院 | 成人国产在线视频在线观看 | 亚洲精品m在线观看 | 亚洲成年网站在线观看 | 99久99久6久热在线播放 | 国产欧美一区二区三区沐欲 | 国产精品二区三区免费播放心 | 免费看一级欧美激情毛片 | 久久成人免费观看草草影院 | 成人在线视频免费看 | 模特视频一二三区 | 久久99精品热在线观看15 | 精品日本久久久久久久久久 | 亚洲视频国产精品 | 91精品观看91久久久久久 | 一级毛片 在线播放 | 日韩一级欧美一级毛片在 | 久久99久久精品国产只有 | 精品三级网站 | 99久久国内精品成人免费 |