www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

US divided over college admissions policy

By LIA ZHU in San Francisco | CHINA DAILY | Updated: 2022-12-12 07:48
Share
Share - WeChat
Students rally outside the US Supreme Court in Washington on Oct 31 before hearings in two cases that could decide the future of affirmative action in college admissions. J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE/AP

Top court hears challenges brought against two universities

National debate in the United States on the role played by race in college admissions culminated with the Supreme Court hearing challenges against two universities.

To create a diverse student body, many colleges and universities in the US consider a student's race as a factor in their admissions process. Such race-conscious policies — known as affirmative action — have been repeatedly upheld by the nation's top court in past decades.

Educators fear a "ripple effect" if the conservative court decides that the affirmative action policy is illegal.

The baseline for permissible affirmative action programs in US higher education was established in 1978.

Citing Harvard University as the model, Justice Lewis Powell said that in evaluating applicants, race could not be the determinative factor, but the university could use race as one of the many factors, just as it uses other traits such as a special talent for music, science or athletics, and even the fact that an applicant's parents attended the university.

In 2016, the Supreme Court upheld an admissions program at the University of Texas at Austin, ruling that the university could continue to consider race as a factor.

This time, the challenges were brought against Harvard and the University of North Carolina, or UNC, with the court hearing the arguments in late October.

The new Supreme Court is the most conservative for 90 years. The six justices appointed by Republican presidents and the three appointed by Democrats appeared divided along ideological lines.

The court is likely to overturn some or all of such case precedents based on sharp and skeptical questioning from the conservative justices.

During court argument, Justice Clarence Thomas asked lawyers for the universities to define "diversity". He said, "It seems to mean everything for everyone." Justice Samuel A.Alito Jr. asked what "underrepresented minority" meant.

The justices are not expected to finalize their opinions until late June or early July. If they rule that affirmative action is unconstitutional, the number of black and Latino students would be reduced in colleges and universities nationwide, particularly at elite institutions.

1 2 3 Next   >>|

Related Stories

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲操综合 | 午夜一级做a爰片久久毛片 午夜伊人网 | 亚洲一区2区三区4区5区 | 一品道一本香蕉视频 | 国产伦精品一区二区三区精品 | 美国一级免费毛片 | 欧美一级毛片欧美大尺度一级毛片 | 国产小呦 | 最近中文字幕免费视频 | 日韩一区二区三区四区 | 欧美日韩综合高清一区二区 | 国产成人精品日本亚洲网址 | 免费播放欧美毛片欧美a | 97在线视频网站 | 亚洲国产网址 | 精品少妇一区二区三区视频 | 一区二区三区免费视频观看 | 欧美日韩中文字幕在线视频 | 中文字幕免费 | 日韩一区二区三区在线 | 亚洲丝袜另类 | 日本一级毛片免费 | 久久精品成人免费看 | 97精品久久久久中文字幕 | 最新国产大片高清视频 | 国产成人精品免费视频网页大全 | 91视频久久久久 | 欧美aaa大片 | 日本s色大片在线观看 | 性欧美巨大的视频 | 国产精品一区二区三区四区五区 | 美女黄频免费看 | 夜间福利在线观看 | 欧美一级在线 | 亚洲日本一区二区三区 | 老外一级毛片免费看 | 精品久久久久久无码中文字幕 | 欧美一级毛片一级 | 国产精品视频视频久久 | 亚洲成人一区在线 | 久久中文字幕久久久久 |