www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / China and the World Roundtable

Transatlantic alliance a troublemaker in trouble

By Benyamin Poghosyan | China Daily | Updated: 2023-07-10 08:13
Share
Share - WeChat
People stage a demonstration to voice their objection to NATO in Brussels, Belgium, on Feb 26. [Photo/Agencies]

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization was established at the dawn of the Cold War in 1949. The transatlantic military alliance was formed "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down", as NATO's first secretary-general Hastings Lionel Ismay said. NATO was established to perpetuate the US' military hegemony over Western Europe, provide a US security umbrella for the Europeans and make them dependent on the US for security-related issues.

Initially, NATO comprised 12 countries, but soon Greece and Turkiye (in 1952), and West Germany (in 1955) joined the alliance.

France, incidentally, was always cautious about too much US influence in Europe. In March 1966, France even announced its intention to withdraw from NATO's integrated military command structure and requested the removal of all Allied headquarters from French territory. A new Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe was established in Casteau, Belgium, in 1967, and the NATO headquarters was moved to Brussels in October of the same year.

After the end of the Cold War, the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, NATO lost its primary goal, with many saying that the transatlantic alliance, too, should be dismantled. But under then US president Bill Clinton, Washington pushed forward the idea of NATO's expansion by including former socialist states into the organization and extending not only NATO's reach but also US influence over Eastern and Central Europe, even though verbal guarantees were given to the Soviet Union in the late 1980s that after the reunification of Germany, NATO will not expand eastward.

The NATO's expansion, particularly the April 2008 Bucharest summit decision on the future accession of Ukraine and Georgia into NATO, triggered a new confrontation between Moscow and the West (especially Washington) and is one of the primary reasons for the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which broke out in February 2022.

Since NATO's establishment, many leaders of member states have questioned the necessity of the organization. In November 2019, French President Emmanuel Macron made his famous remark about Europe seeing the "brain death of NATO", saying Europe should start thinking of itself strategically as a geopolitical power in control of its own destiny.

However, the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the complete rupture of Russia-West relations seem to have injected a new lease of life into NATO. Declaring Russia a strategic threat to the alliance, NATO seeks to give a new meaning to itself, with the US pushing NATO to take a more anti-China approach, inserting into the alliance's strategic documents anti-China rhetoric and seeking to extend NATO to the Asia-Pacific.

NATO plans to open a liaison office in Japan in 2024 to coordinate strategic moves with close partners across the "Indo-Pacific region", including Australia, the Republic of Korea and New Zealand, while the alliance and Japan plan to strengthen cooperation to tackle cyber threats, disinformation, and emerging and disruptive technologies.

The US seeks to use the Russia-Ukraine conflict to consolidate its hegemonic hold over Europe, sending a clear message to its European members that Europe faces a serious threat from Russia, and China, without a US security umbrella. But despite the US' efforts to present its policies as fair and necessary, below-the-surface issues continue to define the organization.

One such contentious area is the candidate for the next NATO secretary-general's position. After months of struggle, the NATO states decided to continue with Jens Stoltenberg as secretary-general for another year, which temporarily halts the jockeying between candidates and countries that compete for the White House's support.

The struggle shows the lack of unanimity in the alliance and, at the same time, proves the role of the US as the ultimate decision-maker of NATO.

The author is chairman, Center for Political and Economic Strategic Studies, Yerevan, Armenia.

The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 美女张开腿双腿让男人桶 | 亚洲欧洲久久久精品 | pgone太大了兽王免费视频 | 欧美高清一级片 | 国产日韩欧美在线观看不卡 | 久久久国产精品视频 | japanesehd国产在线无毒不卡 | 国产合集91合集久久日 | 国产精品福利午夜一级毛片 | 久久久久久毛片免费播放 | 国产或人精品日本亚洲77美色 | 久久国产精品永久免费网站 | 全部aⅴ极品视觉盛宴精品 全部免费a级毛片 | 日本免费高清视频二区 | 国产精品亚洲欧美日韩久久 | 中文字幕一区在线观看 | 成人国产三级精品 | 免费a网| 国产超薄肉色丝袜足j | 欧美xxxx成人免费网站 | 久久国内精品自在自线观看 | 中文字幕一区二区三区视频在线 | 手机看片av | 国产精品视频免费 | 亚洲视频免费看 | 亚洲依依成人综合在线网址 | 久久久99精品免费观看 | 欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 免费黄色毛片视频 | 亚洲一区二区三区在线视频 | 最新怡红院全部视频在线 | 久久在线视频播放 | 亚洲加勒比久久88色综合一区 | 国产精品1区2区 | 福利网址在线 | 久草在线视频网 | 亚洲精品一区二区观看 | 中文字幕亚洲另类天堂 | 日本欧美一区二区 | 免费看日韩欧美一级毛片 | 日本乱子伦xxxx |