久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Culture
Home / Culture / Film and TV

Film puts justifiable defense in spotlight

By YANG ZEKUN | China Daily | Updated: 2024-02-16 07:12
Share
Share - WeChat
A poster for the film Article 20 shows actress Zhao Liying portraying a deaf-mute mother. The movie has sparked discussion about the legal concept of justifiable self-defense. CHINA DAILY

Comments from experts, officials and the public about a movie centered on the theme of justifiable defense have called for grasping the essence of the legal concept to prevent unlawful behavior.

The film, Article 20, which is directed by Zhang Yimou, draws its name from Article 20 of the Criminal Law, which focuses on the sometimes contentious legal concept of justifiable self-defense.

Drawing inspiration from real-life cases of justifiable defense, the film has garnered widespread attention and resonated with the public as well as judicial institutions during the Spring Festival holiday. The movie calls for a nuanced interpretation of legal provisions and urges against compromising on unlawful conduct.

According to the Criminal Law, when a person, faced with an unlawful attack, takes action to protect his or her own rights or interests or those of others, and the attacker is thereby harmed, the defender will be considered to have acted in justifiable defense and will not bear criminal liability.

For some time, justifiable defense has been regarded as a "dormant clause", due to challenges in interpretation and the influence of misconceptions, such as "whoever is injured or killed is right".

Many online users have commented that the true meaning of the law should be to increase the liability for wrongdoers, rather than burdening good people.

Recent cases have shown that, for ordinary citizens, justifiable defense is no longer an illusory provision.

Luo Xiang, a renowned professor of criminal law at China University of Political Science and Law, said in a recent comment about the film that the public and judicial officers should avoid taking a "godlike" perspective or adopting a rational but armchair stance. Instead, they should consider the situation in which the defender was involved, empathize with the defender's position, and refrain from making excessive demands on the defender, Luo said.

Ji Bingxue, a prosecutor with the Supreme People's Procuratorate, said in an article published on the SPP's WeChat account that the Criminal Law established the justifiable defense system in 1979 to provide an incentive for citizens to combat crime. Despite improvements in 1997, the system remained dormant for a significant period.

Beyond the statutory provisions, cases involving justifiable defense are often complex, with many lacking adequate evidence, leading to sometimes controversial determinations, Ji said. Additionally, precedents set in previous cases have influenced the application of the justifiable defense concept.

A high-profile case in Kunshan, Jiangsu province, in 2018 served as a wake-up call and caught the attention of judicial authorities regarding such cases. In that case, atraffic dispute led to a knife-wielding motorist confronting another man. The motorist was killed, and police and prosecutors determined that the defender's actions constituted justifiable defense.

Since then, prosecutors in several places across the nation have applied the justifiable defense clause.

There has been public concern in such cases that has primarily focused on the criteria for determining justifiable defense versus excessive defense. The concern over justifiable defense reflects the public's demand for democracy, rule of law, fairness, justice and security, Ji said, adding that the principle of "not compromising with unlawfulness" must guide prosecutors in handling such cases.

"The judiciary serves as society's last bastion of fairness and justice; any faltering risks eroding public trust," he said.

Liu Zhe, a prosecutor from the Beijing People's Procuratorate, said that the existence of "dormant clauses" signifies a lag between legislative and judicial concepts, resulting in misapplications.

"The reliance on outdated judicial concepts inevitably leads to flawed cases. Persisting with such flawed precedents hinders progress, leading to an unjust status quo," Liu said.

Liu emphasized that judicial officers should possess critical thinking skills, dynamically understand the law's essence, and adapt to evolving societal needs to meet public demands for rule of law.

Making decisions departing from traditional precedents requires courage and accountability, Liu said, adding that judicial authorities must consistently support justifiable defense and intervention to empower the public to combat illegal activities.

Most Popular
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲一区二区在线视频 | 色播亚洲精品网站 亚洲第一 | 毛片1级 | 亚洲欧美精品一区 | 三级网站视频在线观看 | 免费视频99 | 国内精品久久久久久久久久影视 | 国产成人精品曰本亚洲78 | 国产a级三级三级三级 | 欧美ab| 国产欧美日韩图片一区二区 | 久在草 | 国产精品久久久久久久网站 | 欧美日本韩国一区二区 | 91精品久久久久亚洲国产 | 中文毛片| 泷泽萝拉亚洲精品中文字幕 | 国产免费怡红院视频 | a级一级黄色片 | 美女扒开腿让男人桶尿口 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区孕妇 | 亚洲欧美一级久久精品 | 国产综合久久久久影院 | 国产高清在线精品一区a | 国产欧美一区二区三区在线看 | 99在线观看精品免费99 | 欧美日韩国产人成在线观看 | 免费看操片 | 一男一女的一级毛片 | 99热精品在线观看 | 亚洲免费高清视频 | 国产精品二区高清在线 | 久久久影院亚洲精品 | 日本不卡一区在线 | 国产亚洲精品自在久久77 | 国产精品亚洲精品日韩已方 | 国产1000部成人免费视频 | 波多野结衣一级 | 亚洲3级| 国内免费自拍视频 | 午夜宅男宅女看在线观看 |