久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Global Views

New barbarism

By MARCOS CORDEIRO PIRES | China Daily Global | Updated: 2025-06-04 07:30
Share
Share - WeChat
WANG XIAOYING/CHINA DAILY

The US is attacking civilizational progress, order and rules in response to a world that eschews giving it pride of place

Rules are fundamental to human civilization. Since primitive times, life in society has only developed in an environment based on rules, long before they were recorded in writing and courts or tribunals were created. All ancient civilizations had prohibitions against murder, theft and dishonor, etc. As the social division of labor advanced and people created commerce and monetized exchanges, the rules became more complex and comprehensive.

With the advent of the capitalist mode of production and the expansion of European trade, Britain, the hegemonic power of the time, reorganized its own institutionality and subsequently imposed it throughout the world. To this end, it dissolved feudal regulations to create a national labor market, such as abolishing the "Poor Law", banning trade guilds and eliminating the Act of Settlement of 1662, which tied poor people to their parish, precisely at a time when industrial cities were demanding more labor.

In the historical process of creating the liberal order, the English government institutionalized the gold standard in Great Britain (the Bank Charter Act of 1844), establishing the Bank of England's monopoly and establishing a ratio between its gold reserves and the notes it could issue. The English model was later extended to other countries, marking British financial hegemony until at least 1914.

Another significant change for the consolidation of the country's hegemony was the repeal of the Corn Laws, which, until then, protected local food producers and marked the liberalization of international trade in England. From then on, England imposed on the entire world what became known as the pillars of the "Pax Britannica", such as the balance of power system in Europe, the liberal state, the self-regulated market and the gold standard. These rules, applied by the leading industrialized countries, were the basis for the long cycle of internationalization of the world economy between 1850 and the beginning of World War I.

After the turbulent years between 1919 and 1945, when the League of Nations, created after World War I, could not mediate the international community's interests, a new order was established with the creation of the United Nations and the Bretton Woods Agreement. In this new phase of international relations, the United States consolidated itself as a hegemonic power, influencing world politics, the arms race, credit, money and multilateral institutions. Even now, the country maintains veto power over the actions of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. Today, eight decades later, we see the US-led order eroding before our eyes.

After the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the US government began to adopt unilateral policies, such as NATO's bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade in 1999 or the invasion of Iraq in 2003, which occurred even after the UN Security Council vetoed it. It used drones to kill its enemies without legal process or UN authorization in many parts of the Middle East.

During his first term as US president, Donald Trump began the final dismantling of the post-World War II order when he launched a trade war against China and hamstrung the World Trade Organization by refusing to appoint arbitrators to the institution's appellate body. This stance continued with the Joe Biden administration, which advanced an economic decoupling project that put the globalization process at risk. About four months ago, with the start of the second Trump administration, international rules were torn apart by protectionist measures, blackmail, sanctions, threats of invasion of other countries, and the defunding of UN bodies, such as the World Health Organization.

The US elite, in response to the emergence of a new configuration of global power and the rise of countries in the Global South, has begun to adopt measures aimed solely at maintaining the status quo. It has attempted to stifle its competitors' right to development, boycott technology transfer, break value chains and blackmail companies to move their activities to its territory. Today, as a great power, the US has become a destabilizing variable in the global economy.

At this time of transition in humanity's direction, which has been triggered by profound technological advances, the increase in international insecurity, and global challenges such as climate change, it is very important to recreate a global order that can bring hope, stability and predictability to the world's population.

In this sense, the articulations of the countries of the Global South around platforms such as BRICS are welcome, as well as a series of global initiatives proposed by China, which seek to emulate actions to guarantee the right to development for all nations, to create a safe international environment, in which the security of one country is not at the expense of the security of another, and in which the identities and cultural and historical aspects of each people are respected, without imposing models or hierarchies.

On May 20, Chinese Vice-Premier Liu Guozhong announced that China would donate an additional $500 million to the WHO over five years, just as the WHO is seeking further resources to offset the expected loss of funding from the US. This example shows the need to increase multilateralism to support a new order that is inclusive, democratic, collaborative, fair and environmentally responsible. Without orders and rules, there is no civilization, only barbarism.

The author is a professor of international political economy at Sao Paulo State University in Brazil. The author contributed this article to China Watch, a think tank powered by China Daily.

The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

Contact the editor at editor@chinawatch.cn.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久久99精品免费观看精品 | 日韩美女视频在线观看 | 欧美三级免费 | 曰本毛片va看到爽不卡 | 国产亚洲精品久久久久久午夜 | 国产一区亚洲二区 | 午夜剧场福利社 | 久久久亚洲欧洲日产国码二区 | 又粗又爽又色男女乱淫播放男女 | 视频三区精品中文字幕 | 男人一进一出桶女人视频 | 美女视频永久黄网站免费观看韩国 | 国产精品日本一区二区在线播放 | 欧美一级毛片欧美毛片视频 | 欧美在线黄 | 91无套极品外围在线播放 | 国产亚洲精品一区二区三区 | 欧美性毛片大片 | 日韩一区国产二区欧美三 | 男女国产视频 | 精品毛片免费看 | 特黄特色一级特色大片中文 | 爽爽爽爽爽爽爽成人免费观看 | 精品一区二区三区免费爱 | 福利社色| 一区二区三区欧美日韩国产 | 久久草在线视频 | 成人国产第一区在线观看 | www.91亚洲| 热久久91 | 在线精品亚洲 | 大陆老太xxxxxxxxhd| 色丁香久久 | 成人毛片高清视频观看 | 国产aaa级一级毛片 国产aaa毛片 | 黄色网址亚洲 | 欧美精品不卡 | 国产一级视频在线 | 欧美黑人性xxx猛交 欧美很黄视频在线观看 | 午夜影院啪啪 | 三级三级三级全黄 |