www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Global Views

New barbarism

By MARCOS CORDEIRO PIRES | China Daily Global | Updated: 2025-06-04 07:30
Share
Share - WeChat
WANG XIAOYING/CHINA DAILY

The US is attacking civilizational progress, order and rules in response to a world that eschews giving it pride of place

Rules are fundamental to human civilization. Since primitive times, life in society has only developed in an environment based on rules, long before they were recorded in writing and courts or tribunals were created. All ancient civilizations had prohibitions against murder, theft and dishonor, etc. As the social division of labor advanced and people created commerce and monetized exchanges, the rules became more complex and comprehensive.

With the advent of the capitalist mode of production and the expansion of European trade, Britain, the hegemonic power of the time, reorganized its own institutionality and subsequently imposed it throughout the world. To this end, it dissolved feudal regulations to create a national labor market, such as abolishing the "Poor Law", banning trade guilds and eliminating the Act of Settlement of 1662, which tied poor people to their parish, precisely at a time when industrial cities were demanding more labor.

In the historical process of creating the liberal order, the English government institutionalized the gold standard in Great Britain (the Bank Charter Act of 1844), establishing the Bank of England's monopoly and establishing a ratio between its gold reserves and the notes it could issue. The English model was later extended to other countries, marking British financial hegemony until at least 1914.

Another significant change for the consolidation of the country's hegemony was the repeal of the Corn Laws, which, until then, protected local food producers and marked the liberalization of international trade in England. From then on, England imposed on the entire world what became known as the pillars of the "Pax Britannica", such as the balance of power system in Europe, the liberal state, the self-regulated market and the gold standard. These rules, applied by the leading industrialized countries, were the basis for the long cycle of internationalization of the world economy between 1850 and the beginning of World War I.

After the turbulent years between 1919 and 1945, when the League of Nations, created after World War I, could not mediate the international community's interests, a new order was established with the creation of the United Nations and the Bretton Woods Agreement. In this new phase of international relations, the United States consolidated itself as a hegemonic power, influencing world politics, the arms race, credit, money and multilateral institutions. Even now, the country maintains veto power over the actions of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. Today, eight decades later, we see the US-led order eroding before our eyes.

After the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the US government began to adopt unilateral policies, such as NATO's bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade in 1999 or the invasion of Iraq in 2003, which occurred even after the UN Security Council vetoed it. It used drones to kill its enemies without legal process or UN authorization in many parts of the Middle East.

During his first term as US president, Donald Trump began the final dismantling of the post-World War II order when he launched a trade war against China and hamstrung the World Trade Organization by refusing to appoint arbitrators to the institution's appellate body. This stance continued with the Joe Biden administration, which advanced an economic decoupling project that put the globalization process at risk. About four months ago, with the start of the second Trump administration, international rules were torn apart by protectionist measures, blackmail, sanctions, threats of invasion of other countries, and the defunding of UN bodies, such as the World Health Organization.

The US elite, in response to the emergence of a new configuration of global power and the rise of countries in the Global South, has begun to adopt measures aimed solely at maintaining the status quo. It has attempted to stifle its competitors' right to development, boycott technology transfer, break value chains and blackmail companies to move their activities to its territory. Today, as a great power, the US has become a destabilizing variable in the global economy.

At this time of transition in humanity's direction, which has been triggered by profound technological advances, the increase in international insecurity, and global challenges such as climate change, it is very important to recreate a global order that can bring hope, stability and predictability to the world's population.

In this sense, the articulations of the countries of the Global South around platforms such as BRICS are welcome, as well as a series of global initiatives proposed by China, which seek to emulate actions to guarantee the right to development for all nations, to create a safe international environment, in which the security of one country is not at the expense of the security of another, and in which the identities and cultural and historical aspects of each people are respected, without imposing models or hierarchies.

On May 20, Chinese Vice-Premier Liu Guozhong announced that China would donate an additional $500 million to the WHO over five years, just as the WHO is seeking further resources to offset the expected loss of funding from the US. This example shows the need to increase multilateralism to support a new order that is inclusive, democratic, collaborative, fair and environmentally responsible. Without orders and rules, there is no civilization, only barbarism.

The author is a professor of international political economy at Sao Paulo State University in Brazil. The author contributed this article to China Watch, a think tank powered by China Daily.

The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

Contact the editor at editor@chinawatch.cn.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久有这有精品在线观看 | 成在线人视频免费视频 | 牲欧美| 欧美日韩加勒比一区二区三区 | 2级毛片| 久久综合一区二区三区 | 男人精品一线视频在线观看 | 国产a免费观看 | 男人的天堂在线观看入口 | 成人精品视频网站 | 免费真实播放国产乱子伦 | 亚洲天堂黄 | 成人性视频在线三级 | 欧美一级www | 5x社区直接进入一区二区三区 | 看真人视频a级毛片 | 在线看精品 | 国产成人免费视频精品一区二区 | 麻豆国产视频 | 玖玖精品在线视频 | 一区二区三区在线免费视频 | 成在线人永久免费播放视频 | 精品久久久久久中文字幕一区 | 可以看的黄网 | 国产成人精品永久免费视频 | 国产黄色三级网站 | 大视频在线爱爱爱爱 | 一级特黄a视频 | 无圣光福利视频 | 亚洲第一男人天堂 | 97se亚洲综合在线韩国专区福利 | 毛片视频网址 | 男女无遮掩做爰免费视频软件 | 蜜桃日本一道无卡不码高清 | 久 在线播放 | 19+韩国主播青草vip视频 | 人操人摸| 国产精品久久国产三级国不卡顿 | 欧美精品久久久久久久免费观看 | 91一区| 亚洲国产成人麻豆精品 |