www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Business
Home / Business / Policies

Why stable China-US trade matters more than ever

By John Quelch | China Daily | Updated: 2025-07-14 09:24
Share
Share - WeChat
CAI MENG/CHINA DAILY

In a time of rising global economic uncertainty and geopolitical fragmentation, the trade relationship between China and the United States remains one of the world's most consequential. Despite current tensions, it is critical to recognize that economic cooperation between the world's two largest economies is not just a bilateral matter — it is a stabilizing force with global implications.

Historically, China-US trade has been broadly mutually beneficial, contributing to prosperity and innovation in both nations. While China has consistently maintained a trade surplus in goods — fueled in part by its strength in manufacturing and export-driven growth — the US has benefited from a significant surplus in services, including education, entertainment, tourism, financial services and intellectual property licensing. US firms, particularly in the consumer, automotive, pharmaceutical and tech sectors, have flourished by tapping into China's vast and increasingly affluent domestic market. Many of these firms also benefit from access to highly educated Chinese talent, which has enriched their global competitiveness.

Conversely, Chinese companies have gained immensely from their access to US capital markets, advanced technologies and management practices. Listing on US exchanges has enabled Chinese firms to raise capital efficiently and adopt international governance standards. Many have used this foundation to modernize operations, strengthen global branding and accelerate international expansion. These interdependencies have created a deep, if complex, web of economic linkages that have underpinned global growth and innovation for decades.

However, at its core, the current trade frictions stem not from trade imbalances alone, but from broader concerns around technological leadership, national security and economic dependency. The challenge lies in managing strategic competition without undermining the significant mutual value created through trade between the two countries.

As both countries navigate the complexities of a shifting geopolitical landscape, it is increasingly clear that trade policy is no longer only about economic efficiency or comparative advantage. It is now deeply intertwined with national strategy. US concerns about intellectual property protection, cybersecurity and technology transfers are mirrored by Chinese concerns about trade restrictions and over-dependence on foreign technologies. These underlying anxieties feed into a cycle of suspicion and countermeasures, complicating efforts to maintain open channels for commerce. The task, therefore, is not simply to rebalance trade flows, but to reestablish a working relationship grounded in transparency, reciprocity and mutual respect.

Recent trade engagements in Geneva and London mark a modest but meaningful turning point. With both the US trade representative and the US secretary of commerce participating, it's clear that tariffs and export controls are now being negotiated in parallel — reflecting the central role of strategic technologies in the evolving trade agenda. The US trade representative and the secretary of commerce have jurisdiction over tariffs and export controls, respectively. This is no longer a conventional trade dispute centered on deficits and surpluses. It is a structural negotiation about the rules governing 21st-century innovation and industrial policy. The presence of both senior US officials also signals a recognition that economic statecraft must be coordinated across agencies to be effective.

Early signs of reciprocity

China lifting blocks on critical minerals such as rare earths and the US offering limited easing of export controls on aircraft parts, software and certain semiconductors are promising developments. While no formal agreement has emerged, the professional tone and shared willingness to reengage inspire cautious optimism. Crucially, these talks suggest that neither side wants a breakdown in dialogue. Instead, there appears to be a growing recognition that a tit-for-tat approach to policymaking is unsustainable. If both sides continue to engage with a commitment to parallel, good-faith actions, the result could be a more stable and constructive economic relationship.

But the risks of missteps remain. Calls for "decoupling" have gained political traction in both countries, yet the economic consequences of such a move would be severe. Interdependence, especially in areas like rare earths, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals, is not a vulnerability — it is a strength that capitalizes on each other's competitive advantages. Full-scale disengagement would undermine global supply chains, increase costs and diminish the efficiency that has powered decades of shared prosperity. In a world of interlocking economic systems, decoupling would also reduce the incentives for diplomatic cooperation, increasing the risk of misunderstanding and miscalculation.

The rare earths sector offers a cautionary tale. China currently dominates global refining capacity for these critical materials, which are essential for goods such as smartphones, electric vehicles and military equipment. US efforts to develop domestic alternatives are hampered by environmental, financial and regulatory challenges.

At the same time, while Chinese firms like Huawei have made impressive gains in chip design and telecommunications, it will take years to match the depth and sophistication of US firms like Nvidia or Intel. This mutual dependency suggests that selective diversification and greater resilience are necessary, but a wholesale separation is both impractical and counterproductive.

That view is echoed by the latest survey from AmCham China, which found that most US firms remain committed to operating in China despite higher tariffs and mounting political pressure. This is not sentimentality — it is pragmatism. China offers scale, skilled talent and an integrated industrial base that cannot be easily replicated. Companies are localizing supply chains and managing risks, but few are prepared to walk away from one of the world's largest consumer markets.

For the broader global trading system, resilience depends on predictability and rules-based governance. In response to unilateral tariff actions, countries should recommit to multilateralism, support regional trade frameworks and modernize institutions like the WTO. Importantly, nations must resist retaliatory measures and instead focus on long-term strategies such as building diversified, geopolitically balanced supply chains. Transparency, regulatory coherence and dispute resolution mechanisms must be reinforced to ensure that global commerce remains a positive-sum game.

China's own role as a pillar of global economic stability cannot be overstated. Throughout the 2008 financial crisis and the pandemic-era recovery, China's steady macroeconomic policies contributed to global confidence. Amid today's uncertainty, China's continued policy stability provides reassurance to international investors and developing economies alike. A stable China supports global growth, cushions shocks in emerging markets and adds predictability to an increasingly volatile world order.

With greater economic influence, however, comes greater responsibility. Global stakeholders increasingly expect China — and all other major economies — to uphold principles of openness, regulatory transparency, and fair, reciprocal trade. Upholding these principles will be critical to deepening trust and sustaining mutually beneficial relationships with partners around the world. Meeting these expectations will also help China demonstrate global leadership in trade governance at a time when institutions are under strain.

There is still a window to shift from confrontation to constructive — even if competitive — coexistence. Strategic competition needs not preclude cooperation, especially in areas of shared interest such as climate change, public health, artificial intelligence and global security. A functioning, forward-looking China-US economic relationship is not just desirable; it is indispensable for global progress.

The views do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

The writer is executive vice-chancellor, American president and distinguished professor of social science at Duke Kunshan University in China and the John deButts professor of practice at Duke University's Fuqua School of Business in the United States.

Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
CLOSE
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产亚洲精品资源一区 | 久操视频免费在线观看 | 污全彩肉肉无遮挡彩色 | 欧洲精品一区二区三区在线观看 | 国产亚洲欧洲一区二区三区 | 美女视频黄a视频美女大全 美女视频黄a视频免费全程 | 三级做人爱c视频18三级 | 亚洲国产经典 | 久久99精品久久久久久h | 高清不卡毛片 | 午夜啪啪福利视频 | 久久久精品国产免费观看同学 | 看亚洲a级一级毛片 | 国产一区二区三区精品久久呦 | 精品欧美成人高清在线观看2021 | 91亚洲精品成人一区 | 国产真实乱子伦xxxxchina | chinese耄耋70老太性 | 国产亚洲一区二区三区在线 | 国产一级强片在线观看 | 美女被免费网站在线软件 | 欧美一区二区三区四区在线观看 | 黄网国产| 91麻精品国产91久久久久 | 精品72久久久久久久中文字幕 | 久99频这里只精品23热 视频 | 色噜噜狠狠大色综合 | 国产片毛片 | 九九久久精品视频 | 亚洲精品第一区二区在线 | 久久毛片网| 国产成人综合亚洲一区 | 国产99久久亚洲综合精品 | 自拍国内| 手机在线日韩高清理论片 | 精品国产成人 | 亚洲视频在线网站 | 亚洲一区二区三区免费观看 | 日本国产欧美 | 国产美女一区二区三区 | 亚洲一区二区三区久久 |