BIZCHINA> Review & Analysis
![]() |
GM plan could drive bond market crazy
By James K. Glassman (China Daily)
Updated: 2009-06-03 14:03
What's my interest in this? I head a nonprofit group that encourages developing nations to adopt policies that will lead to prosperity - starting with transparency and the rule of law - and hold up America as a model. Yet in its high-handed dealings with Chrysler and GM, the Obama administration reminds me of an irresponsible third-world regime, skirting the law and handing economic prizes to political cronies. GM has filed for bankruptcy, and under its complicated plan, bondholders - ranging from large institutions to low-income retirees - would receive just 10 percent of the reorganized company, plus warrants that would enable them to get 15 percent more should the company's value reach certain levels, in return for their $27 billion in loans. The government, which could end up putting $70 billion into GM, would initially get 72.5 percent of the company. In return for money GM owes its health trust, the auto workers' union would get 17.5 percent of its stock, warrants to raise that share to 20 percent, along with a $2.5 billion cash payout over eight years and $6.5 billion in preferred stock paying a 9 percent dividend. I agree with bondholders who feel the union is getting at least four times as much of GM in return for claims that are, at best, equal to those of the creditors. The administration's actions in trying to force the deals may damage the credit markets for years to come. The treatment of the bondholders is a warning to investors that the federal government won't hesitate to push them aside in a crisis.
Perhaps it's no coincidence that in the wake of the Chrysler deal we have seen a decline in prices for long-term Treasury bonds and a sinking dollar. The hardball tactics, furthermore, are unlikely to save GM. In a normal bankruptcy, the company's assets pass from weak hands to strong. In 2008, a terrible year for the auto industry, GM sold 8.4 million vehicles worldwide, collecting revenues of $148 billion that placed it third among non-energy companies on the Fortune 500. GM is a global business, with two-thirds of its revenues coming from outside the United States. While sales last year dropped 21 percent in North America, they rose 30 percent in Russia, 10 percent in Brazil and 9 percent in India. In 2008, GM sold more than one million vehicles in China, up 6 percent over 2007. The company's problem, of course, is that its expenses exceed its revenues. But in strong hands, GM could be a going concern. Unfortunately, the new owners, with about nine-tenths of the shares, will be the government and the UAW. These are the same hands that shaped much of GM's trouble in the first place. With substantial union co-ownership, labor costs won't be contained; and with the government as the boss, politics may trump markets in decisions on such matters as where to put plants and whether to build big cars or small ones. The deal would also put GM's competitors at a serious disadvantage in the short run. Ford, which has been building better cars lately, prudently raised cash against a decline in demand, playing the ant to GM's grasshopper. Now, Ford will face a GM buoyed by taxpayer dollars both for manufacturing and for cheap consumer and dealer financing. The same holds true for the manufacturers that hold the key to future auto-making jobs: well-managed, foreign-based companies like Toyota and Honda, which, according to the automotive analysts at CSM Worldwide, will build more cars in the United States next year than GM, Chrysler and Ford combined. What lesson does federal favoritism toward Chrysler and GM teach other businesses that play by the rules? How will our trade negotiators keep a straight face when complaining about subsidies to Airbus or Chinese steel makers? The government should have stepped aside earlier and allowed a normal bankruptcy that would have treated the union and the debt-holders fairly. The author was under secretary of state for public diplomacy and public affairs in the George W. Bush administration. He is now the president of World Growth, a nonprofit economic-development group. The New York Times Syndicate (For more biz stories, please visit Industries)
|
主站蜘蛛池模板: 一区两区三不卡 | 午夜在线观看cao | 日韩久久中文字幕 | 久久久久综合 | 国产网站黄 | 完全免费在线视频 | 可以看毛片的网址 | 日韩精品一区二区在线观看 | 亚州va | 中文字幕亚洲欧美 | 欧洲成人在线 | 91精品国产高清久久久久 | 国产成人精品日本亚洲语音2 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区孕妇 | 另类欧美视频 | 韩国日本一级毛片免费视频 | 亚洲天堂毛片 | 国产精品久久久久999 | 久久99毛片免费观看不卡 | 日韩亚洲欧美一区噜噜噜 | 日韩视频一区二区 | 一级毛毛片毛片毛片毛片在线看 | 有码 在线| 欧美成人老熟妇暴潮毛片 | 欧美国产综合日韩一区二区 | 亚洲国产经典 | 精品国产乱码久久久久久一区二区 | 亚洲欧洲一区二区三区久久 | 99在线观看精品免费99 | 一区精品麻豆经典 | 国产国产人免费人成成免视频 | 久久综合网址 | 国产成人综合亚洲亚洲欧美 | 中文字幕欧美一区 | 久久成人精品视频 | 成人国产精品视频 | 欧美特黄一级高清免费的香蕉 | 日本免费一级视频 | 欧美日本一区二区三区 | 亚洲免费视频网站 | 窝窝女人体国产午夜视频 |