www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Business / Talking Business

Are going-out companies paying too much?

By DAVID BLAIR (China Daily) Updated: 2016-08-03 07:45

Are going-out companies paying too much?

LeEco CEO Jia Yueting, left, and Vizio Inc CEO William Wang shake hands at a news conference in Los Angeles, where it was announced that LeEco had acquired Vizio for $2 billion. [Photo/Agencies]

In the late 1980s, Japan had over-inflated stock and property markets. Its companies, fleeing the lack of opportunities in Japan itself, vastly overpaid for all manner of US assets. I often dreamed that some Japanese investor would overpay for the house I owned at the time.

The rate of Chinese companies making overseas investments has more than doubled since last year. They often have a business model designed to bring technology and foreign business practices to the huge domestic Chinese market-a much better-defined plan than the Japanese, who were mostly purely financial investors, ever did. But, still I worry that they are paying too much.

Let's take a look at a recent deal. Beijing-based LeEco Global Ltd announced last Tuesday that it agreed to pay $2 billion cash for Vizio Inc, a California-based manufacturer of inexpensive television sets and sound bars. This at a time when the dollar is high relative to the yuan. LeEco argued that Vizio will enable it to gain market share in the coming internet-of-things technology that links all kinds of smart products together. And, it certainly may turn out in that LeEco made a smart move in the long run. But, I still wonder about the pricing.

Vizio filed initial public offering papers with the US Securities and Exchange Commission in July of 2015, but never actually carried out the IPO. According to accounting data in the SEC filing, Vizio's profits were $44.96 million in 2014 and $31.35 million in the first half of 2015.

Since Vizio is privately held and decided not to go through with the IPO, subsequent data are not available. But these numbers imply a profit of roughly $56 million in 2015, assuming that Vizio makes slightly more than half of its profits in the first half, as it did in 2014. Vizio has not been a growth company-its sales and profits in 2014 were about the same as in 2010 and were lower in the years in between.

Vizio's business in the US is in brutally competitive markets. Most consumers in the US consider television sets to be almost undifferentiated commodities-they buy the cheapest one. Vizio has become the biggest-selling brand of TVs in the US by following a low-price strategy. But, this strategy leads to very low margins-profits have averaged less than 3 percent of sales.

Vizio's TVs are connected to the internet, so the company receives potentially valuable data on what shows its customers are watching. But, the company so far has not been able to reap profits from this information. In any case, William Wang, the current CEO and majority owner of Vizio, will retain 51 percent ownership of the Insight division, which will own this data.

The bottom line is that LeEco has agreed to pay about 35 times earnings for a producer of near-commodity products in a highly competitive business. This compares with Apple Inc, which currently trades for 11 times earnings, Google Inc at 30, and Samsung Electronics Co at 3.3.

If Vizio had completed its IPO and received 10 times earnings, which seems about right for a low-margin company, it would have had a market value of $600 million. Even at the current historically high average Dow Industrials price-to-earnings ratio of about 20, which is too high for a company in such a competitive market, Vizio would be worth $1.2 billion.

China Daily reported that Jia Yueting, founder and CEO of LeEco, said that the purchase of Vizio is part of a "big bang plan" to enter the US market.

It may get access to Vizio's distribution channels to sell its phones and other products-but, Vizio sells its TVs through big box stores, such as Best Buy Co Inc, which insist on paying low-margin prices to their suppliers.

It may be able to use its LeEco system to add value to the TVs, but Vizio made its name through low prices-proving that customers are reluctant to pay more for sophisticated TVs. Just about every merger or acquisition is justified on the basis of "synergies", but few actually pay off.

Companies spending their own money have more incentive to get it right than does an outside analyst like myself. But, I do hope the current wave of Chinese companies going-out are not paying too much.

 

 

 

Hot Topics

Editor's Picks
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 91精品国产爱久久久久 | 国产精品一区二区久久精品 | 美女午夜色视频在线观看 | 91热久久 | 亚洲欧美综合国产精品一区 | 成人午夜视频在线观看 | 欧美激情第一欧美在线 | 日韩久久一级毛片 | 久久99久久99精品免观看 | 男女配种猛烈免费视频 | 精品日韩一区二区三区视频 | 欧美猛交xxxx免费看 | 日本欧美一区二区三区在线 | 国产网曝手机视频在线观看 | 国产成人三级 | 国产亚洲精品2021自在线 | 欧美日韩视频一区二区在线观看 | 精品国产区一区二区三区在线观看 | 成人一级网站 | 久久久久久久综合色一本 | 美女网站在线观看视频18 | a级一级黄色片 | 亚洲午夜色 | 欧美性欲视频 | 一级毛片免费 | 新版天堂中文资源8在线 | 久艹在线观看视频 | 亚洲免费高清视频 | 性xxx69xxx视频在线观看 | 免费一级毛片在线观看 | 国产乱码一区二区三区四 | 国产精品自在线 | 国产日韩欧美在线 | 亚洲一区网站 | 夜夜爽影院| 久草资源福利 | 国产欧美日韩精品第三区 | 国产亚洲福利精品一区二区 | 爽爽爽爽爽爽爽成人免费观看 | 国产91av在线| 欧美性活一级视频 |