www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

Economy

Demolition rules seek public input

By Wang Huazhong and Wang Jingqiong (China Daily)
Updated: 2010-12-16 09:19
Large Medium Small

New draft reflects resolve to protect people's rights in relocation cases

BEIJING - Local governments will not be allowed to use their administrative rights to forcibly demolish citizens' properties, and forced home demolitions must go through the courts, according to draft proposals released on Wednesday to gauge public opinion.

The proposals, in an updated draft revision to the urban home demolition regulations, were made available for public response until Dec 30. They also prohibit any organization or individual from using violence, threats or other illegal acts, such as cutting off water, electricity and transport access, to force relocations.

The long-awaited new draft, which experts said enhances legal procedures, replaces the first draft, which resulted in 65,601 responses from Jan 29 to March 3.

"It's the first time for the State Council Legislative Affairs Office to publish a second draft of regulations for a second round of soliciting public opinion," Peking University law professor Shen Kui told China Daily.

"It shows the central government's caution in making such a new rule and its determination to curb the violation of people's rights amid a recent string of violent relocation cases."

Shen is one of the five Peking University professors who suggested that the existing urban housing demolition regulations be revised, after Sichuan province native Tang Fuzhen died following self-immolation in protest against the demolition of her home last year.

The existing regulations stipulate that local governments can resort to administrative or judicial means to carry out demolitions. However, government figures show administrative organs forcibly conducted only 0.2 percent of all demolitions.

"Even though very few detrimental incidents have happened during forced demolitions, effective measures must be taken to avoid such incidents from reoccurring," the State Council Legislative Affairs Office said in a public letter on its website alongside the new draft regulations.

"The revision may help restrict or standardize local governments' activities concerning land requisition and compensation," and should help ease disputes over "property requisition and compensation", the letter said.

The country is at a very critical period of industrialization and urbanization, the office said, and the theme of the revision is to balance public and private interests.

The revision also updates articles concerning two key issues in land requisition and home demolition: compensation and how to define projects of public interest.

Related readings:
Demolition rules seek public input Experts urge passage of new demolition rule
Demolition rules seek public input Reform to end violent demolitions
Rules on demolition
Demolition rules seek public input Regulating demolition is urgent concern
Demolition rules seek public input Demolitions not vital for growth

The issue of compensation was the topic the public responded to most during the first round of solicitation, with 13,332 responses, according to the office.

The second revision makes it clear that compensation must not be lower than the market price and evaluation of the property must be done by qualified rating institutions and can be appealed.

Public interest projects also garnered a large feedback with 9,161 responses between January and March. These responses were concerned about the definition of public interest projects. If a property falls under this category it could result in forced demolition.

According to the second revision, the following projects are considered public interest: Government projects involving energy, transport, education, resources and environment protection, disaster relief, social welfare, public service, as well as office building for government agencies.

A number of recent high-profile incidents of forced relocations triggered widespread publicity and growing calls for a revision to the existing regulations, which allow forced relocation before any legal procedures or payment of compensation.

However, little progress had been reported after the first draft revision was made public in January and many scholars had expressed concern that resistance from local governments, whose finances rely heavily on real estate development, impeded the reform process.

Wang Weiguo, a law professor at China University of Political Science and Law, said the reason that the revision takes so long is that it's difficult to balance the interests of the community and individuals.

Wang said he welcomes the new draft making forced relocation only possible after judicial procedure. "Even if it's really a public interest project, necessary judicial procedures should be ahead of forced relocation," he said.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品久久久久久影院 | 久草福利资源在线观看 | 久艹在线观看视频 | 欧美a级在线 | 国产精品亚洲二线在线播放 | 日韩黄色一级片 | 成人国产在线不卡视频 | 91精品全国免费观看 | 爽死你个放荡粗暴小淫货双女视频 | 精品久久久久久久久久久 | 欧美高清日本三级人妇 | 一级毛片成人免费看a | 国产三级小视频 | 在线观看免费亚洲 | 亚洲天堂免费 | 曰本女同互慰高清在线观看 | 在线成人97观看 | 久久伊人男人的天堂网站 | 日韩一级欧美一级 | 成人亚洲综合 | 欧美精品成人3d在线 | 国内精品福利视频 | 国产高清一级片 | 免费一级欧美片片线观看 | caoporen个人免费公开视频 | 国产一级aaa全黄毛片 | 国产一成人精品福利网站 | 久久久999国产精品 久久久99精品免费观看 | 日本在线毛片视频免费看 | 美女张开双腿让男人桶 | 国产亚洲精品高清在线 | 久久香蕉国产线看观看亚洲片 | 国产激爽大片在线播放 | 91久久亚洲精品国产一区二区 | 韩国一大片a毛片 | 日韩色在线 | 三级大片网站 | 亚洲香蕉一区二区三区在线观看 | 日韩视频在线观看中字 | 国产在线乱子伦一区二区 | 欧美国产成人一区二区三区 |