www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Business / View

Alibaba IPO a caveat for regulators

By Han Qi (China Daily) Updated: 2014-09-18 07:01

After its initial public offering (IPO) on New York Stock Exchange, Alibaba is expected to become the third-biggest Internet company listed in the United States in terms of market value. Although Alibaba's IPO is expected to fetch between $154 billion to $169 billion and could turn out to be the largest of its kind in US history, many Chinese might be asking a question: Why did Alibaba founder Jack Ma seek to list on the NYSE rather than seeking A-shares on the Chinese mainland?

A lot of Chinese could also be asking: Why other Chinese Internet giants such as Tencent, Baidu and JD.com have chosen to list overseas despite making it big due to domestic customers? Have they been unfair to their clients, the domestic stock market and the national economy?

Yes and no. Since Alibaba is registered in the Cayman Islands as a foreign company, China's current stock market policies are not in favor of its listing on the country's bourse. To get listed in China, Alibaba has to redesign its preparatory plan to accommodate the auditing standards of the country - a very costly affair - apart from paying huge amounts in taxes. Plus, it will have to spend a considerable amount to transfer its overseas rights and interests to China to fulfill the numerous legal requirements to abolish and terminate previous agreements.

Like many Chinese Internet companies, Alibaba relies on a legal structure known as a variable interest entity (or VIE), which allows it to bypass the Chinese government's restrictions on foreign ownership of businesses in certain sectors, including information technology. So, it would have been very difficult - legally as well as financially - for Alibaba to "re-register" in China, which is mandatory for any company seeking listing on Shanghai or Shenzhen stock exchange.

Besides, to retain the decision-making powers in Alibaba, Ma and other top executives could look to only New York to launch the IPO. For the moment, Ma and his partners, who are authorized to nominate most of Alibaba's board members, own only 10 percent of the company's shares - 7 percent of which belongs to Ma. With the Hong Kong Stock Exchange refusing to allow a company with dual-class structure to be listed, Alibaba had no choice but to go to the NYSE. Also, the US stock market - because of its strict regulations, sound supervision and the system of class action - is more conducive to Alibaba's further growth.

Given the not-so-market-savvy management of the A-share market, it is not surprising that Ma did not choose Shanghai or Shenzhen to launch the IPO. According to the licensing system of the A-share market, most Chinese IT companies, including Tencent and JD.com in their initiative years, were not qualified for listing going by their profit margins, growth and assets size. Moreover, an A-share listed company's refinancing avenues are strictly limited and expensive, whereas a US-listed enterprise continues to enjoy a wide range of financing options.

Perhaps worse, the China Securities Regulatory Commission has been overcautious in managing the domestic stock market, especially when it comes to approving IPOs. Quite a few large private companies in China are not even close to getting listed despite being in business for years and investing huge amounts of capital. For an Internet giant like Alibaba, which requires massive financing, it would have been even more difficult to fight over the IPO under current market policies.

Alibaba's listing in New York somehow reflects that China's stock market is no longer suited to meet the demands of the country's economic growth. Essentially, the auditing system for listed Chinese enterprises, which controls companies' entry to the stock market, is nothing but a means to ensure the survival of the weakest. Also, by seeming to lose the grip on advanced technologies and changing business modes, the CSRC-led auditing system creates a big problem for investors and enterprises alike. And it is because of such restrictions that an increasing number of companies from emerging industries have to plan their listing overseas, leading to considerable financial loss and public rage.

Therefore, the CSRC has to work out an auditing system that would allow the market to decide which companies could be listed in China. In fact, this should be the CSRC's principal urgent task, because as administrative supervisor of the market, it is supposed to focus on law enforcement, and not decide the fate of companies and bourses.

The author is a professor at the School of International Trade and Economics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing.

Alibaba IPO a caveat for regulators Alibaba IPO a caveat for regulators
All you wanted to know about Alibaba 
Alibaba options expected to be listed on Sept 29: exchanges 

Hot Topics

Editor's Picks
...
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产日韩线路一线路二 | 香港日本韩国三级网站 | 亚洲精品一区二区三区在线播放 | 草草视频免费在线观看 | 伊人色综合久久成人 | 精品国产视频在线观看 | 特黄aaaaaa久久片 | 美女张开腿给男人捅 | 欧美日韩国产一区二区三区在线观看 | 国产成人精品久久一区二区小说 | 国产免费一级高清淫曰本片 | 亚洲精品色一区二区三区 | 国产一区欧美 | 黄网站在线播放视频免费观看 | 国产精品久久自在自线观看 | 爽爽窝窝午夜精品一区二区 | 国产精品一 | 草草久久97超级碰碰碰免费 | 草草久 | 中文字幕一区二区三区精品 | 亚洲自偷自偷图片在线高清 | 久久精品道一区二区三区 | 中国人免费观看高清在线观看二区 | 香港三级日本三级妇人三级 | 一级做人爱a视频正版免费 一级做性色a爱片久久片 | 午夜精品网 | 久久亚洲高清观看 | 91亚洲人成手机在线观看 | 国产性自爱拍偷在在线播放 | 久9青青cao精品视频在线 | 亚洲 欧美 成人 | 国产嫩草影院在线观看 | 亚洲成a人v | 男女在线观看视频 | 成人免费午间影院在线观看 | 国产区网址 | 欧美亚洲国产精品久久久 | 中文字幕在线网址 | 欧美另类久久久精品 | 亚欧成人毛片一区二区三区四区 | 色三级大全高清视频在线观看 |