www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Business / Technology

Cracking the Qualcomm anti-monopoly case

(China Daily) Updated: 2015-06-24 08:25

Cracking the Qualcomm anti-monopoly case

Shoppers walk past a Samsung retail store in Hong Kong. The South Korean-based company was involved in an investigation by the NDRC in January 2013. [Photo/Agencies]

The meeting only lasted about half an hour. We made no progress and negotiations were hard. I understood the company's concerns as they absolutely wanted to keep their business model. But from our view, we wanted to change that, so Qualcomm eventually accepted the fine.

Tell us your reflections about the case?

China's anti-monopoly law enforcement came into its own during the investigation. It was related to intellectual property abuse. At times, it can be difficult to draw the line between intellectual property abuse and intellectual property protection. There were very few previous cases we could refer to. Qualcomm had been under investigation in the European Union, Japan and South Korea, but never admitted monopoly status.

In August 2014, the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China issued a public statement regarding the anti-trust department's law enforcement procedures. It questioned the impartiality of the investigation. How did you deal with that?

I refused to meet with them at first because they issued the statement before talking to us. But the chamber later said it was a misunderstanding. As for the transparency questions they raised, the details of a monopoly case "can, but not necessarily, be made public" according to Chinese law. Some companies have asked us not to reveal details of investigations because it could damage their image. We respected their concerns.

The US chamber of commerce complained about the behavior of investigators who raided the Mercedes-Benz's Shanghai office during a price-fixing probe in August 2014. The German auto giant was later fined $56.5 million by the NDRC. What was your reaction to this?

Well, the practice of mounting a raid to gather information is carried out by our US counterparts. Acquiring first-hand information is critical during an anti-trust case. If we had not raided the offices, key information would have simply disappeared. US anti-monopoly agents use the same techniques.

The other complaint against the NDRC was that it did not allow companies being investigated to hire lawyers. What are your comments on that?

During the Qualcomm case, there was a local lawyer on the spot all the time in our discussions.

Overseas critics say you have gone to great lengths to single out foreign companies. What is your response?

Investigating overseas companies accounts for only 10 percent of our workload. But we still need to improve a number of things. Now, we will publicly announce penalty notices, but information that companies believe contains business secrets will not be made public.

Hot Topics

Editor's Picks
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久五月女厕所一区二区 | 免费观看毛片的网站 | 久青草国产手机在线观 | 亚洲欧美极品 | 91精品国产免费 | 在线观看亚洲成人 | 宅男69免费永久网站 | 精品国产欧美一区二区五十路 | 欧美成人精品一级高清片 | 久久久久久青草大香综合精品 | 中国高清色视频www 中国黄色网址大全 | 看一级毛片一区二区三区免费 | 国产成人亚洲精品77 | 请看一下欧美一级毛片 | 久久精品国产一区 | 日韩精品中文字幕一区二区三区 | 精品一区二区久久久久久久网站 | 久久国产精品高清一区二区三区 | 国内自拍网红在线综合 | 国产成人亚洲综合网站不卡 | 亚洲美女一级片 | 亚洲欧美专区精品久久 | 久久亚洲精品视频 | 酒色影院 | 特级aa一级欧美毛片 | 欧美特级特黄a大片免费 | 日本丶国产丶欧美色综合 | 国产热久久精 | 亚洲日本视频在线观看 | 国产日韩一区二区三区 | 亚洲精品在线视频观看 | 久久韩国 | 久久福利资源国产精品999 | 一级aaaaaa毛片免费同男同女 | 国产精品反差婊在线观看 | 欧美日韩视频精品一区二区 | 欧美一级片免费观看 | 特级毛片免费视频播放 | 亚洲性在线观看 | 国产东北色老头老太性视频 | 亚洲小视频在线 |