www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Business / Technology

Cracking the Qualcomm anti-monopoly case

(China Daily) Updated: 2015-06-24 08:25

Cracking the Qualcomm anti-monopoly case

Shoppers walk past a Samsung retail store in Hong Kong. The South Korean-based company was involved in an investigation by the NDRC in January 2013. [Photo/Agencies]

The meeting only lasted about half an hour. We made no progress and negotiations were hard. I understood the company's concerns as they absolutely wanted to keep their business model. But from our view, we wanted to change that, so Qualcomm eventually accepted the fine.

Tell us your reflections about the case?

China's anti-monopoly law enforcement came into its own during the investigation. It was related to intellectual property abuse. At times, it can be difficult to draw the line between intellectual property abuse and intellectual property protection. There were very few previous cases we could refer to. Qualcomm had been under investigation in the European Union, Japan and South Korea, but never admitted monopoly status.

In August 2014, the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China issued a public statement regarding the anti-trust department's law enforcement procedures. It questioned the impartiality of the investigation. How did you deal with that?

I refused to meet with them at first because they issued the statement before talking to us. But the chamber later said it was a misunderstanding. As for the transparency questions they raised, the details of a monopoly case "can, but not necessarily, be made public" according to Chinese law. Some companies have asked us not to reveal details of investigations because it could damage their image. We respected their concerns.

The US chamber of commerce complained about the behavior of investigators who raided the Mercedes-Benz's Shanghai office during a price-fixing probe in August 2014. The German auto giant was later fined $56.5 million by the NDRC. What was your reaction to this?

Well, the practice of mounting a raid to gather information is carried out by our US counterparts. Acquiring first-hand information is critical during an anti-trust case. If we had not raided the offices, key information would have simply disappeared. US anti-monopoly agents use the same techniques.

The other complaint against the NDRC was that it did not allow companies being investigated to hire lawyers. What are your comments on that?

During the Qualcomm case, there was a local lawyer on the spot all the time in our discussions.

Overseas critics say you have gone to great lengths to single out foreign companies. What is your response?

Investigating overseas companies accounts for only 10 percent of our workload. But we still need to improve a number of things. Now, we will publicly announce penalty notices, but information that companies believe contains business secrets will not be made public.

Hot Topics

Editor's Picks
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 成人亚洲国产综合精品91 | 久草在线视频中文 | 亚洲综合视频 | 精品国产一区二区三区在线观看 | 国产人成午夜免费噼啪视频 | 国产精品自在线天天看片 | 美国毛片免费观看 | 国产a毛片| 日本人成免费大片 | 欧美一级毛片在线观看 | 亚洲天堂一区二区在线观看 | 亚洲经典三级 | 男女男免费视频网站国产 | a级在线观看 | 久久精品国产亚洲精品2020 | 国产亚洲精 | 久久成人18免费 | 一级日韩 | 搞黄网站免费观看 | 国产中文字幕视频在线观看 | 欧美一级在线全免费 | 特黄特级a级黄毛片免费观看多人 | 男女同床爽爽视频免费 | 欧美一级片网站 | 亚洲国产精品成人午夜在线观看 | 国产成人高清视频在线观看免费97 | 午夜美女网站 | 99久久免费看精品国产一区 | 思思99re| 久久看片网 | 手机在线国产精品 | 奇米888四色在线精品 | 日韩一级片免费在线观看 | 牛人国产偷窥女洗浴在线观看 | 欧美成人26uuu欧美毛片 | 韩国美女爽快毛片免费 | 免费观看成人久久网免费观看 | 国产偷国产偷亚洲高清在线 | 免费观看a毛片一区二区不卡 | 亚洲国产高清一区二区三区 | 巨大热杵在腿间进进出出视频 |