www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Business / Technology

Cracking the Qualcomm anti-monopoly case

(China Daily) Updated: 2015-06-24 08:25

Cracking the Qualcomm anti-monopoly case

Shoppers walk past a Samsung retail store in Hong Kong. The South Korean-based company was involved in an investigation by the NDRC in January 2013. [Photo/Agencies]

The meeting only lasted about half an hour. We made no progress and negotiations were hard. I understood the company's concerns as they absolutely wanted to keep their business model. But from our view, we wanted to change that, so Qualcomm eventually accepted the fine.

Tell us your reflections about the case?

China's anti-monopoly law enforcement came into its own during the investigation. It was related to intellectual property abuse. At times, it can be difficult to draw the line between intellectual property abuse and intellectual property protection. There were very few previous cases we could refer to. Qualcomm had been under investigation in the European Union, Japan and South Korea, but never admitted monopoly status.

In August 2014, the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China issued a public statement regarding the anti-trust department's law enforcement procedures. It questioned the impartiality of the investigation. How did you deal with that?

I refused to meet with them at first because they issued the statement before talking to us. But the chamber later said it was a misunderstanding. As for the transparency questions they raised, the details of a monopoly case "can, but not necessarily, be made public" according to Chinese law. Some companies have asked us not to reveal details of investigations because it could damage their image. We respected their concerns.

The US chamber of commerce complained about the behavior of investigators who raided the Mercedes-Benz's Shanghai office during a price-fixing probe in August 2014. The German auto giant was later fined $56.5 million by the NDRC. What was your reaction to this?

Well, the practice of mounting a raid to gather information is carried out by our US counterparts. Acquiring first-hand information is critical during an anti-trust case. If we had not raided the offices, key information would have simply disappeared. US anti-monopoly agents use the same techniques.

The other complaint against the NDRC was that it did not allow companies being investigated to hire lawyers. What are your comments on that?

During the Qualcomm case, there was a local lawyer on the spot all the time in our discussions.

Overseas critics say you have gone to great lengths to single out foreign companies. What is your response?

Investigating overseas companies accounts for only 10 percent of our workload. But we still need to improve a number of things. Now, we will publicly announce penalty notices, but information that companies believe contains business secrets will not be made public.

Hot Topics

Editor's Picks
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 91精品国产免费 | 日本一级全黄大片 | 91亚洲自偷手机在线观看 | 亚洲国产日韩欧美一区二区三区 | 亚洲精品一区国产二区 | 女人张开腿让男人捅视频 | 国产成人精品一区二区不卡 | www.久久久 | 久久国产精品99久久久久久牛牛 | 高清国产一级精品毛片基地 | 久久香蕉精品视频 | 国产精品露脸脏话对白 | 九九国产在线观看 | 三级网站视频 | 亚洲国产美女视频 | 国产中文在线视频 | 国产成人精品免费视频大全办公室 | 在线免费视频国产 | 国产一区在线看 | 美女午夜影院 | 国产精品1区 2区 3区 | 成人免费一级片 | 亚洲高清成人欧美动作片 | 国产一区二区三区日韩欧美 | 成年女人毛片免费视频 | a毛片免费全部播放完整成 a毛片免费全部在线播放毛 | 国产亚洲一级精品久久 | 久久久久亚洲香蕉网 | 亚洲视频在线一区二区 | a一级毛片免费高清在线 | 精品99视频| 99久久久久国产精品免费 | 伊人精品视频 | 2021精品国产品免费观看 | 极品欧美 | 欧美日本一区亚洲欧美一区 | 国产在线精品二区韩国演艺界 | 久久精品在 | 中国老妇另类xxxx | 成人免费在线观看视频 | 欧美 日韩 国产 成人 在线观看 |