www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

   

CHINA / National

On trade, the US and China need to go global
By Philip Bowring (iht)
Updated: 2006-03-28 08:52

With President Hu Jintao due to visit the United States, there is an urgent need for a cease-fire in the war of words between China and the United States over trade.

Here is how to do it in ways that would not only serve both countries' interests but those of global trade.

First, both should agree on the point that trade imbalances are a global issue more than a bilateral one. It makes little sense for the United States to focus on China's currency value and China to berate America for its lack of savings when the imbalance issues are more complicated.

Even if China's currency is undervalued against the dollar, but no more so than the currencies of most of East Asia - Japan, South Korea, Thailand, Malaysia, etc. These are all countries with which China has large trade deficits.

So no major realignment of the yuan can be expected without a more general alignment such as occurred after the 1985 Plaza Accord. Of course the United States is profligate, but East Asia saves too much for its own - or the rest of the world's - good. So there can be no resolution without movement on all sides.

The focus on bilateral imbalances, with all the nationalistic talk that accompanies it, can be partly blamed on the International Monetary Fund's failure to play the role for which it was intended - avoiding inappropriate exchange rates and achieving equilibrium in payments balances. Instead, it has for years been preoccupied with bailing out middle-ranking countries such as Turkey and Argentina.

Surely it should not be difficult for the United States and China to agree that they both have domestic policy contributions to make to reducing global imbalances - including a mutual need to reduce fossil fuel dependence - while focusing primarily on the global dimensions of the problem.

They might both have to swallow a little pride, but Presidents Hu and George W. Bush should agree to push the imbalance issue on to the international stage where it belongs.

The second subject for agreement is less obvious but could be just as important for global trade harmony. That is a cease-fire in the competition for bilateral free-trade agreements. These are taking energy and political capital away from the World Trade Organization's Doha Round of negotiations at a critical juncture.

Free-trade agreements sound grand to national leaders, but at best are a poor substitute for multilateral agreements. They create a thicket of special favors and country-of-origin rules which are often a nightmare for businesses trying to organize efficient production systems.

At least in Asia, China started the push with its politically driven free- trade pact with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, forcing Japan and South Korea to promise to follow.

But currently it is the United States that is forcing the pace with negotiations about to start with South Korea, the 10th-biggest U.S. trading partner, and with Malaysia. The carrot is sealing a special trading relationship with the United States before the 2007 deadline for expiry of presidential fast-track negotiating authority.

South Korea wants to get a step ahead of Japan; Malaysia to keep up with Singapore, which already has a free-trade agreement, and Thailand, which is negotiating one.

In practice, the agreements appear more political than economic. Australia signed up despite getting only modest improvements in access for its farm products. Thailand's negotiations are stuck on light trucks as well as agriculture and have become a domestic political issue. South Korea's will no doubt see an outpouring of nationalism from assorted protectionists, from farmers to filmmakers, and even Malaysia is likely to witness significant opposition.

It is abundantly clear that bilateral deals do little for real trade while providing extra opportunities for antiglobalizers, who can link opposition to trade liberalization to opposition to what they claim to be an expansion of U.S. political power and the interests of its multinationals. Free-trade agreements need to be put on the back burner and full attention given to the Doha round.

A cease-fire on free-trade agreements is in the interests of China, America and the righting of global trade imbalances. It would have the added benefit of reducing political competition in East Asia between China, Japan, South Korea and the United States by placing trade competition back where it belongs - within the WTO framework.

The outlook for the Hu visit may seem bleak, but here are two presents the presidents can make to each other and the world.

 
 

Related Stories
 
主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久视频这里只精品3国产 久久视频这里只有精品 | 亚洲午夜精品一级在线播放放 | 亚洲欧洲一区二区三区在线 | 久草手机视频在线观看 | 精品国产综合区久久久久久 | 69欧美| 一本色道久久88亚洲精品综合 | 亚洲精品一区二区三区四区 | 狠狠色丁香久久婷婷综合_中 | 手机毛片 | 国产一区二区在线不卡 | 欧美大片国产在线永久播放 | 久久综合色88 | 日韩在线精品视频 | 天堂资源8中文最新版在线 天堂最新版 | 视频精品一区二区 | 伊人2233| 久久久久久久91精品免费观看 | 欧美日一本 | 国产欧美日韩在线一区二区不卡 | 嫩草影院ncyy在线观看 | 国产一级久久免费特黄 | 久久精品国产一区二区三区不卡 | 玖玖国产在线 | 欧美日韩成人在线视频 | 国产精品免费综合一区视频 | 波多野结衣在线免费视频 | 99久久99久久久精品久久 | 亚洲素人在线 | 波多野吉衣 免费一区 | 日韩中文字幕视频 | 高清毛片一区二区三区 | 国产欧美日韩在线视频 | 8050网午夜一级毛片免费不卡 | 久久中文字幕久久久久91 | 一色屋成人免费精品网站 | 免费精品99久久国产综合精品 | 欧美在线视频一区二区 | 国产黄色小视频 | 久久久久久久久一次 | 国产精品一区亚洲一区天堂 |