CHINA> Regional
![]() |
Official-killer's case fires up netizens
By Cai Ke (China Daily)
Updated: 2009-06-04 09:59 For his blog entry on May 24, Xia Lin wrote a detailed reconstruction of the events that led up to the stabbings on May 10, based on conversations with Deng Yujiao. In it, he accused Deng Guida and Huang of attempted rape.
At 9 pm that day, the Badong county authority announced Zhang had hired two local lawyers - Wang Shaopeng of the Wuhan-based Li Feng Law Firm, and Liu Gang of Chengye Law Firm, Yichang - to defend Deng Yujiao. The move sparked more activity online, this time including a fake blog on sina.com.cn, set up to look as though lawyer Wang had written it. In it, the author argued Deng was guilty. When it was also suggested Wang was a legal advisor to the Hubei government, the blog was lambasted by netizens. It was shortly followed by an entry containing the personal details of both lawyers, including their home addresses, phone numbers and emails. The blog was later closed down. China Daily was unable to reach the lawyers by phone. A receptionist at Wang's office said: "I haven't seen him or been able to reach him since he took the case." Netizens also released the personal details of Deng Guida, 44, who was director of business promotion office for Yesanguan, Deng Zhongjia and Huang. Their families are believed to have gone into hiding. Deng Yujiao was released from detention on May 26. Days later, the police issued a statement saying she had used self-defense with "excessive force" and her case had been passed on to the local procurator's office. No formal charges have yet been made. Netizens continue to watch avidly as the case progresses, but their growing involvement in high-profile cases such as Deng's has helped coin a new phrase: public judges. Not content with being able to just air their opinion online, netizens now demand more information and are ever-quick to jump to conclusions when it comes to questions of guilt. In the case of Hu Bin, a 20-year-old man who hit and killed a college graduate while racing his Mitsubishi Evo against friends in Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, last month, web users immediately demanded he be charged with "endangering public security" before police had concluded their full investigation into the cause of the tragic accident. "The public don't have the right to legally judge anyone," said a Legal Daily editorial recently. "Public opinions may sometimes conflict with the rationality of law. "The media is the source of the public's knowledge, but it sometimes reports unsubstantiated details. In the course of law, details differentiate guilty and not guilty, even life and death." Zhou Zhe, a professor with China Youth College for Political Science in Beijing, told China Daily: "I think it is a good thing netizens are taking part in public inquiries. They have the right to express their point of view. "But the government must make independent judgments and only adapt what is reasonable, and never lose its impartiality." Zhou suggested netizens should not be regarded as a singular group of people, adding: "There could be professionals who see things from their position, government officials who wish to disperse rumors or ordinary people. "Online or otherwise, people should act within the law."
![]()
|
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产va精品网站精品网站精品 | 搞黄网站免费看 | 欧美成人一区二区三区 | 性福利视频 | 国产自在自线午夜精品 | 在线国产日韩 | 一级视频在线免费观看 | 欧美日韩精品一区二区视频在线观看 | 九九精品视频在线播放8 | 成人手机在线视频 | 在线网站黄色 | 成人一级视频 | 图片区偷拍区小说区 | 国产真实乱子伦精品视手机观看 | 欧美特级特黄a大片免费 | 精品一区二区三区在线成人 | 亚洲视频免费播放 | 国产片在线观看狂喷潮bt天堂 | 99久久亚洲国产高清观看 | 久草免费在线播放视频 | 337p粉嫩大胆噜噜噜鲁 | 欧美成人高清视频 | 一级片免费观看视频 | 国内精品久久影视 | 久草久草久草 | 高清一级毛片 | 亚洲综合p | 中国一级做a爰片久久毛片 中日韩欧美一级毛片 | 韩国美女激情视频一区二区 | 一级毛片在线免费观看 | 国产视频成人 | 成人满18在线观看网站免费 | 日本女人www | 欧美aaa大片 | 九九精品视频一区二区三区 | 成人影院免费看 | 国产精品久久毛片 | 久久国产欧美日韩精品免费 | 久久久久琪琪去精品色村长 | 99久久精品免费看国产一区二区三区 | 理伦毛片|