www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

Make me your Homepage
left corner left corner
China Daily Website

China makes it easier to sue government

Updated: 2013-12-24 00:13
( Xinhua)

BEIJING - A draft amendment to the Administrative Procedure Law, submitted to China's top legislature for a first reading on Monday, should make it easier for citizens to take the government to court.

The Administrative Procedure Law, which went into effect in October 1990, is a major guarantee of citizens' rights to pursue the government through the courts, and this first revision to the law should alleviate "petition pressure."

While applauding a law that once played an important role in solving disputes, Xin Chunying, deputy director of the Legislative Affairs Commission of the National People's Congress (NPC) Standing Committee, said citizens had started to complain of "three difficulties" in making a case against governments: the filing of cases; the hearings of such cases; and enforcement of verdicts which favor citizens.

When citizens, legal persons or other organizations have disputes with governments or governmental staff, governments are unwilling to be defendants and courts are reluctant to accept and hear such cases, leading many citizens to try to solve their disputes through "letter and visit" (petitions), Xin said.

In many parts of the country, citizens have more confidence in petitions than in laws, she said as she explained the draft amendment to Monday's assembly of the bimonthly session of the NPC Standing Committee, which is being held from December 23 to 28.

To smooth the litigation process, the draft amendment stresses the courts' duty to ensure citizens can take authorities to court and underlines the need for courts to accept cases involving governments as defendants. Governments should neither intervene nor obstruct courts from filing and hearing such cases. Governmental defendants should respond to the suits according to law.

The amendment means more rights infringement cases should be accepted by the courts. People's courts will now accept suits in which administrators have infringed citizen's legal ownership or right to use over natural resources such as forests, pasture, mineral reserves, mountains and water.

Courts shall also be required to accept suits concerning infringement of rural land contracts and management rights, illegal fundraising, unlawful collection or requisition of property, or unfairly apportioned fees.

Citizens may bring cases against governments which fail to provide appropriate subsistence allowances or social insurance benefits.

To further protect citizens' right to sue, the draft allows individuals to sue the government via oral deposition. For those who have difficulty writing a statement of charges, the court will write the plaintiff's oral statement into records and notify the sued party.

To standardize the litigation procedure, the draft amendment adds articles to ensure that courts make a registration upon receiving an indictment and give a written statement with due date to the plaintiff.

If the indictment is valid, the court should file the case within seven days of receiving the complaint. If the indictment does not meet standards for filing, plaintiffs should be informed in writing of the reasons for refusal, also within seven days. Plaintiffs may appeal to higher courts if they are dissatisfied with the rationale.

If courts neither file a case nor give a clear statement in seven days, plaintiffs may appeal to a higher court. If the higher court rules the case should be filed, they may accept it directly or pass it on to a more appropriate court.

To reduce intervention in cases in which government itself is the defendant, the draft amendment allows higher courts to designate remote grassroots courts to accept trans-regional administrative cases.

The revision is of great significance for averting government intervention in administrative cases and realizing truly independent hearings of such cases, said Jiang Ming'an, professor at Peking University.

Considering that many administrative bodies simply refuse to implement or ignore verdicts which favor citizens, the amendment stipulates that administrative bodies' refusal to execute verdicts should be made public.

The leaders of bodies which refuse to abide by verdicts will be subject to detention, if their refusals exert a very bad influence on society.

8.03K
 
...
...
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国外免费一级 | 日韩a级 | 欧美激情综合亚洲五月蜜桃 | 性色a v 一区| 日本加勒比视频在线观看 | 欧美一级看片免费观看视频在线 | 久草在线国产视频 | 久久频这里精品香蕉久久 | 久草在线视频免费播放 | 日韩精品免费视频 | 在线视频一区二区三区在线播放 | 国产一级特黄特色aa毛片 | 国产精品天天爽夜夜欢张柏芝 | 黄www片| 一区二区三区四区五区六区 | 日产国产精品久久久久久 | 久久久久久久国产精品影院 | 51国产偷自视频区视频手机播器 | 欧美特级视频 | 国产精品久久久久影院 | 手机看片99| 欧美va在线播放免费观看 | 欧美一区二区三区视频在线 | 欧美色视频日本片高清在线观看 | 三级手机在线观看 | 国产资源在线免费观看 | 视频一区精品 | 国产精品二区三区免费播放心 | 日本a级片免费看 | 欧美激情一区二区三区高清视频 | 国内精品久久久久久久亚洲 | 久色tv| 中文字幕精品视频 | 久久久亚洲欧美综合 | 九色porny真实丨国产18 | 精品国产免费观看一区 | 亚洲国产成人九九综合 | 精品成人免费视频 | 思99re久久这里只有精品首页 | 韩国毛片视频 | 欧美视频一区二区三区四区 |