www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

Make me your Homepage
left corner left corner
China Daily Website

China makes it easier to sue government

Updated: 2013-12-24 00:13
( Xinhua)

BEIJING - A draft amendment to the Administrative Procedure Law, submitted to China's top legislature for a first reading on Monday, should make it easier for citizens to take the government to court.

The Administrative Procedure Law, which went into effect in October 1990, is a major guarantee of citizens' rights to pursue the government through the courts, and this first revision to the law should alleviate "petition pressure."

While applauding a law that once played an important role in solving disputes, Xin Chunying, deputy director of the Legislative Affairs Commission of the National People's Congress (NPC) Standing Committee, said citizens had started to complain of "three difficulties" in making a case against governments: the filing of cases; the hearings of such cases; and enforcement of verdicts which favor citizens.

When citizens, legal persons or other organizations have disputes with governments or governmental staff, governments are unwilling to be defendants and courts are reluctant to accept and hear such cases, leading many citizens to try to solve their disputes through "letter and visit" (petitions), Xin said.

In many parts of the country, citizens have more confidence in petitions than in laws, she said as she explained the draft amendment to Monday's assembly of the bimonthly session of the NPC Standing Committee, which is being held from December 23 to 28.

To smooth the litigation process, the draft amendment stresses the courts' duty to ensure citizens can take authorities to court and underlines the need for courts to accept cases involving governments as defendants. Governments should neither intervene nor obstruct courts from filing and hearing such cases. Governmental defendants should respond to the suits according to law.

The amendment means more rights infringement cases should be accepted by the courts. People's courts will now accept suits in which administrators have infringed citizen's legal ownership or right to use over natural resources such as forests, pasture, mineral reserves, mountains and water.

Courts shall also be required to accept suits concerning infringement of rural land contracts and management rights, illegal fundraising, unlawful collection or requisition of property, or unfairly apportioned fees.

Citizens may bring cases against governments which fail to provide appropriate subsistence allowances or social insurance benefits.

To further protect citizens' right to sue, the draft allows individuals to sue the government via oral deposition. For those who have difficulty writing a statement of charges, the court will write the plaintiff's oral statement into records and notify the sued party.

To standardize the litigation procedure, the draft amendment adds articles to ensure that courts make a registration upon receiving an indictment and give a written statement with due date to the plaintiff.

If the indictment is valid, the court should file the case within seven days of receiving the complaint. If the indictment does not meet standards for filing, plaintiffs should be informed in writing of the reasons for refusal, also within seven days. Plaintiffs may appeal to higher courts if they are dissatisfied with the rationale.

If courts neither file a case nor give a clear statement in seven days, plaintiffs may appeal to a higher court. If the higher court rules the case should be filed, they may accept it directly or pass it on to a more appropriate court.

To reduce intervention in cases in which government itself is the defendant, the draft amendment allows higher courts to designate remote grassroots courts to accept trans-regional administrative cases.

The revision is of great significance for averting government intervention in administrative cases and realizing truly independent hearings of such cases, said Jiang Ming'an, professor at Peking University.

Considering that many administrative bodies simply refuse to implement or ignore verdicts which favor citizens, the amendment stipulates that administrative bodies' refusal to execute verdicts should be made public.

The leaders of bodies which refuse to abide by verdicts will be subject to detention, if their refusals exert a very bad influence on society.

8.03K
 
...
...
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 在线欧洲成人免费视频 | 手机午夜看片 | 91成人在线视频 | 手机国产日韩高清免费看片 | 亚洲1314 | jyzzjyzz国产免费观看 | 日韩在线播放视频 | 日本一级特黄a大片 | 9191久久久久视频 | 久草视频资源在线 | 国产成人精品一区二三区2022 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区在线 | 国产国语在线播放视频 | 好吊色综合网天天高清 | 国产性生活 | 亚洲国产精品久久日 | 久久99国产精一区二区三区 | 日韩精品一区二区三区视频网 | 国产美女精品三级在线观看 | 99精品热女视频专线 | 久久精品国产国产精品四凭 | 97精品久久久久中文字幕 | 欧美一级成人毛片视频 | 国产美女主播一级成人毛片 | 九草在线视频 | 一级做性色a爰片久久毛片 一级做性色a爰片久久毛片免费 | 亚洲欧美性视频 | 一级一级一片免费 | 中文字幕综合在线 | xxxx欧美视频 | 亚洲国产成人久久一区二区三区 | 欧美精品束缚一区二区三区 | 欧美性性性性性色大片免费的 | 国产在线高清不卡免费播放 | 欧美日本一区二区三区道 | 青青爽国产手机在线观看免费 | 欧美日韩精品一区二区三区 | 波多野结衣在线视频观看 | 成人国产亚洲欧美成人综合网 | 久久亚洲国产视频 | 成人满18在线观看网站免费 |