www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
China / Society

Chinese Society of International Law releases paper on South China Sea arbitration initiated by the Philippines

(Xinhua) Updated: 2016-06-10 18:41

BEIJING - The Chinese Society of International Law (CSIL) on Friday releases a paper under the title the Tribunal's Award in the "South China Sea Arbitration" Initiated by the Philippines is Null and Void, supporting the Chinese Government's position of neither accepting nor participating in the arbitration initiated by the Philippines.

From a legal point of view, the CSIL criticizes on errors the Arbitral Tribunal makes in its award on jurisdiction, and demonstrates that both this award and the pending award on merits are null and void.

The Paper points out that the Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility in the South China Sea Arbitration, issued by the Arbitral Tribunal on 29 October 2015, is full of errors in both the determination of fact and the application of Law. In the Award, there exist at least six main errors as follows:

First, the Tribunal errs in finding that the claims made by the Philippines constitute disputes between China and the Philippines concerning the interpretation or application of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS);

Second, the Tribunal errs in taking jurisdiction over claims which in essence are issues of sovereignty over land territory and are beyond the purview of the UNCLOS;

Third, the Tribunal errs in taking jurisdiction over claims concerning maritime delimitation which have been excluded by China from compulsory procedures in line with the UNCLOS;

Fourth, the Tribunal errs in denying that there exists between China and the Philippines an agreement to settle the disputes in question through negotiation;

Fifth, the Tribunal errs in finding that the Philippines had fulfilled the obligation to "exchange views" regarding the means of dispute settlement with respect to the claims it made;

Sixth, the Tribunal's Award deviates from the object and purpose of the dispute settlement mechanism under the UNCLOS, and impairs the integrity and authority of the UNCLOS.

The Paper stresses that the Tribunal's Award on Jurisdiction, by contravening the principle of prudence, is groundless in fact or law and obviously unjust. Such a political decision shall have no legal effect.

Finally, the Tribunal's establishment of jurisdiction over the Philippines' claims is completely erroneous. Therefore, any decision that the Tribunal may make on the substantive issues will equally have no legal effect.

Highlights
Hot Topics

...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产视频三级 | 亚洲线精品久久一区二区三区 | 国产真实乱子伦精品 | 欧美极度极度另类 | 成人国内精品久久久久影院 | 国产精品二区三区免费播放心 | 天天看夜夜 | 久久久久99精品成人片三人毛片 | 日韩三级免费观看 | 一级做a爰片欧美一区 | 香港三级日本三级人妇三级四 | 国产三a级日本三级日产三级 | 国产成人精品一区二区视频 | 久青草免费视频手机在线观看 | 欧美经典成人在观看线视频 | 九一国产精品视频 | 92国产福利久久青青草原 | 国产成人精品久久亚洲高清不卡 | 欧美日韩视频一区三区二区 | 国产精品久久久久久亚洲伦理 | 国产孕妇做受视频在线观看 | 日本不卡免费高清视频 | 日韩一级欧美一级一级国产 | 久久久久国产视频 | 2019偷偷狠狠的日日 | 青草青99久久99九九99九九九 | 久久青草免费免费91线频观看 | 国内精品91久久久久 | 亚洲国产精品久久人人爱 | 欧美日韩精品高清一区二区 | hdxxx色视频 hd欧美xxx欧美极品hd | 国产三级在线视频观看 | 亚州欧美 | 久久国产精品夜色 | 成人在线欧美 | 精品免费国产 | 男人和女人在床做黄的网站 | 中文字幕亚洲精品久久 | 免费高清毛片在线播放视频 | 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 特色一级片 |