www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

   
  home feedback about us  
   
CHINAGATE.OPINION.Population    
Agriculture  
Education&HR  
Energy  
Environment  
Finance  
Legislation  
Macro economy  
Population  
Private economy  
SOEs  
Sci-Tech  
Social security  
Telecom  
Trade  
Transportation  
Rural development  
Urban development  
     
     
 
 
Prompt change to rule guards people's rights


2003-06-21
China Daily

The much-criticized system of sending beggars and vagrants back to their home provinces is coming to an end, thanks to the government's response to public questioning.

The relocation system, established more than two decades ago under specific historical circumstances, is not in line with the current situation.

A new draft regulation is to take its place, emphasizing the provision of aid instead of putting people into custody and then forcing them back to their original provinces. The draft, adopted by the State Council on Wednesday, is to undergo further revision before being implemented.

The government has made a significant change in its concept of administration, going from being a controller to being a service provider.

The system of sending people to their home provinces gradually evolved into a system of mandatory punitive measures that usually targeted migrant workers.
Millions of farmers now flood cities to look for work, which serves the needs of industrialization and urbanization and also contributes significantly to rural and urban economic development. In these circumstances, such a regulation constitutes discrimination against migrant workers.

Though the new draft has not yet been published, announcements from the State Council executive meeting presided over by Premier Wen Jiabao illustrate that the future way of dealing with people begging and roaming cities will involve the building of an efficient social aid and relief mechanism instead of simply forcing people to return to their home province.

People with no money to cover their basic living expenses in cities will be covered by the mechanism on a voluntary basis, unlike the old regulation, which led to mandatory intervention and removal.

The State Council decision is a satisfactory response to the fierce public debate over the controversial rule.

The public have applauded the government's timely response and efficient way of working, as can be judged from the many such comments posted on the Internet.
Debate over the rule was sparked by the tragic death of Sun Zhigang on March 20.
Sun, a 27-year-old native of Central China's Hubei Province, had been working in Guangzhou in South China's Guangdong Province for a local garment company. He died in a holding centre's hospital after being brutally beaten.

He was detained by local police under the excuse of a local regulation based on the old system. Then he was sent to a relocation station as a sanwu person - someone in a city with no legal identity documents, normal residence or source of income.
Those responsible for Sun's death have been punished. The process of putting things right, however, did not end when the sentences were announced.

Public critiques also pinpointed the relocation system as also being to blame for Sun's tragic death.

In May, two groups of legal experts wrote to the National People's Congress Standing Committee, calling for a review of the relocation rule. According to the experts, the rule violates citizens' freedom of the person as stipulated in China's Constitution.

At a time when people are still wondering whether and when the Congress, the nation's highest legislative body, will review the State Council document, now the State Council has promptly rectified its own rule.

The case is significant in the process of China building up its legal system.
It is not certain whether the State Council action was taken under pressure of a possible review by the Congress, but the result itself illustrates that a very positive system of interactive administration is coming into being.

The relocation regulation may not be the only or the last administrative rule made by governments at various levels to become outdated or to violate people's constitutional rights. It is to be hoped that more action will follow to truly guarantee people's constitutional rights.


 
 
     
  print  
     
  go to forum  
     
     
 
home feedback about us  
  Produced by m.orobotics.cn. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@chinagate.com.cn
主站蜘蛛池模板: 日本一线一区二区三区免费视频 | 久久九九精品视频 | 欧美日韩精品免费一区二区三区 | 国产日韩欧美综合一区二区三区 | 黄色一级片在线看 | 欧美日韩一区二区三区在线播放 | 99精品视频在线观看免费 | 国产性自拍 | 久久综合香蕉久久久久久久 | 亚洲国产日韩a在线亚洲 | 亚洲日韩视频免费观看 | 99久久精品国产自免费 | 九草在线播放 | 国产精品久久久99 | 国产成人精品福利网站人 | 成年人三级网站 | 欧美国产精品亚洲精品第一区 | 成人中文字幕一区二区三区 | 国产真人毛片一级视频 | 干欧美女人 | 日本视频播放免费线上观看 | 中文字幕一区二区在线播放 | 午夜久久视频 | 久久中文字幕乱码免费 | a级毛片在线观看 | 波多野结衣aⅴ在线 | 特级aaa片毛片免费观看 | 亚洲欧美日韩精品久久 | 免费看a | 99re6这里有精品热视频在线 | 日韩一区二区三 | 性视频亚洲| 国产亚洲精品一区二区在线播放 | 午夜毛片网站 | 欧美视频一二三区 | 99在线热视频只有精品免费 | 成 人 在 线 免费 8888 www | 欧美极品第1页专区 | 久久亚洲视频 | 成人免费视频网站 | 国产成人高清一区二区私人 |