www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

   
  home feedback about us  
   
CHINAGATE.OPINION.Rural development    
Agriculture  
Education&HR  
Energy  
Environment  
Finance  
Legislation  
Macro economy  
Population  
Private economy  
SOEs  
Sci-Tech  
Social security  
Telecom  
Trade  
Transportation  
Rural development  
Urban development  
     
     
 
 
Rural rebuilding needs wide support


2006-02-22
China Daily

When President and Communist Party General Secretary Hu Jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao appeared on TV screens weeks ago celebrating Lunar New Year with ordinary farmers, it was indeed symbolic.

Many of the two leaders' recent public appearances outside Beijing have had a rural feel, which is very much in tune with, and representative of, their proposal to build a "new countryside."

One thing that defines and to some extent distinguishes their statesmanship, however, is political pragmatism.

A low-profile study session on "new countryside" that ended Monday in the secluded courtyard of the Central Party School is widely seen as the prelude to all-out action.

Immediately afterward, the official roadmap was unveiled yesterday, when Xinhua News Agency published the CPC Central Committee's Document No.1 for 2006.

The Hu-Wen edition of "new countryside" rose to a new height at the Party School forum, which gathered both Hu and Wen, as well as 200 or so Party and government chiefs from the provinces and ministries. At the event, the two added ecological well-being to their previous blueprint of the ideal rural life.

"New countryside," as interpreted by the two, incorporated higher productivity, better living standard, communal civility, democratic management, as well as a clean and tidy look.

If that version of "new countryside" is reflective of the leadership's appreciation of harmony in civil life, the inclusion of an ecological perspective has extended harmony to people's interaction with the environment.

The proposal for a "new countryside" is not new in modern China. Advocates and experiments date back to even before the founding of the People's Republic in 1949.

But its re-emergence on our national agenda is the result of an extensive rethink about rural life in the full context of national development.

It is increasingly clear that many of the problems pestering urban China and the national leadership have their roots outside the cities. And the decades-old neglect of the countryside in national development planning is not only irrational, but unfair.

Economists' rediscovery of the countryside has a lot to do with expectations of our rural residents' largely dormant demands to sustain the country's proud growth story.

The government has made repeated promises to boost farmers' incomes. To reduce farmers' financial burdens, it has cancelled agricultural tax and promised to pay tuition for nine-year compulsory education in rural areas.

The idea of bringing rural areas into the sphere of public finance and make it a priority indicates a meaningful shift in the leadership's development philosophy.

Making industries feed the countryside and cities support rural regions in return is not only an economic move to balance the national economic picture. It is repaying a long overdue moral debt. We must address the rural-urban divide, not because it has become a clumsy drag on national development, but because the countryside is home to the majority of Chinese citizens.

A substantial and persistent financial commitment is crucial for rebuilding rural China. The humble yet challenging tasks to grant rural Chinese access to clean and convenient running water, clean fuel, decent kitchens and toilets, paved roads and affordable medical services require that.

But the "new countryside" on the leadership's drawing board entails more.

The new Party paper offers a comprehensive course of action that touches upon all aspects of the anticipated upgrade of Chinese rural life.

Most of all, we need to see rural areas become a natural part of our scholarly and official discourse on development.

The study session at the Party school was considered a venue for consensus building. We do need genuine consensus on this, a consensus not only among Party and government decision-makers, but among society as a whole.

The passionate concern Hu and Wen have conveyed on their trips to poor rural communities needs to be shared by all in leadership positions.

 
 
     
  print  
     
  go to forum  
     
     
 
home feedback about us  
  Produced by m.orobotics.cn. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@chinagate.com.cn
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产成人一区二区三中文 | 日韩欧美一区二区不卡看片 | 午夜宅男在线永久免费观看网 | 成人看的午夜免费毛片 | 国产一区二区三区不卡在线观看 | 99视频久久精品久久 | 精品国产九九 | 久久久久亚洲视频 | 国产免费一级高清淫曰本片 | 免费区欧美一级毛片精品 | 看欧美的一级毛片 | 日韩精品综合 | 小明台湾成人永久免费看看 | 岛国搬运工最新网地址 | 亚洲欧美日韩精品久久 | 精品国产品香蕉在线观看 | 在线播放第一页 | 最爽的乱淫片免费 | 久久中文字幕在线观看 | a级男女性高爱潮高清试 | 欧美一级毛片俄罗斯 | 中文国产成人精品久久一区 | 欧美三区 | 国产人成午夜免费噼啪视频 | 日韩特级毛片免费观看视频 | 欧美搞黄视频 | 欧美日韩看看2015永久免费 | 欧美孕妇孕交 | 亚洲欧洲一区二区三区在线 | 日韩一品在线播放视频一品免费 | 毛片成人 | 做爰成人五级在线视频| 美国一级毛片片免费 | 亚洲 欧美 激情 另类 自拍 | 成人国产一区二区三区 | 成人午夜私人影院入口 | 亚洲成a v人片在线观看 | 久久青草国产手机看片福利盒子 | 免费在线成人 | 免费成年网 | 韩国女主播青草在线观看 |