久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

  Home>News Center>World
         
 

US: Nuclear weapons sites still vulnerable
(Agencies)
Updated: 2004-04-28 09:29

Security upgrades ordered at nuclear weapons sites after the Sept. 11 attacks may not be fully in place for five more years, U.S. auditors say.

The delay has led to the possibility that plutonium and weapons-grade uranium might have to be removed from some facilities.

Investigators with the US General Accounting Office said Tuesday the Energy Department’s 2006 deadline for meeting its new security requirements at weapons labs and other facilities probably is not realistic, short by possibly as much as three years.

At the same time even that program, based on assumptions developed last year about the kind of terrorist assault that might be expected given the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, is being revised, administration and congressional officials acknowledged.

For the first time, the Energy Department is asking security planners to prepare for the possibility that a terrorist would try to take over a facility holding nuclear material, barricade himself inside and try to fashion a crude nuclear weapon and detonate it in a suicide attack.

Security plans previously have been designed under an assumption that a terrorist would break in to steal the material and could be thwarted on the way out.

Some lawmakers and private watchdog groups have said that some facilities would be impossible to defend against a suicide assault and that plutonium and highly enriched uranium at those sites should be relocated.

Rep. Christopher Shays, R-Conn., asked why it took nearly two years after the attacks in New York and at the Pentagon for the Energy Department to develop its revised May 2003 assessment of the kinds of terror attacks security forces probably would have to defend against. He also wanted to know why it will take another two to five years to deal with the increased risks.

‘Terrorists will not wait that long’

“We know the terrorists will not wait that long to try to exploit lingering vulnerabilities in our nuclear complex defenses,” said Shays, chairman of the House Government Reform subcommittee dealing with nuclear security.

Energy Department officials acknowledged their latest security plans won’t be fully in place everywhere the government has weapons-grade material until the end of 2006. They characterized the GAO assessment that another three years might be needed as overly pessimistic.

“Today, no nuclear weapons, special nuclear material or classified materials are at risk anywhere within the nuclear weapons complex,” Linton Brooks, head of the DOE’s National Nuclear Security Administration, told the subcommittee members.

Brooks acknowledged risk always exists but assured the lawmakers, “People looking for a soft spot would be ill-advised” to target DOE facilities. “There are no soft spots.”

Shays said that some of the sites should be closed, or at least their nuclear materials transferred elsewhere. It “should have been immediately obvious” that the government “has too many facilities housing nuclear materials” and that consolidation is needed.

Plutonium and weapons-grade uranium are being kept at nearly a dozen facilities within the DOE weapons complex including five national laboratories.

Review of plans for storing materials

Brooks said the department is reviewing the weapons complex to determine where material can be consolidated, either in more secure areas within facilities or at other sites. Plans already are in place to move plutonium from the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico to the Nevada Test Site.

“But consolidation is not a panacea,” Brooks said.

He said he opposes moving the plutonium at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California to another location, for example, because scientists there need the material to assess the weapons stockpile properly. To move material from another DOE facility, the Y-12 complex near Oak Ridge, Tenn., could take decades, probably cost billions of dollars and accomplish little in the short term, Brooks said. Current plans would consolidate the material within the Y-12 complex.

Citizen groups and watchdog organizations have singled out Lawrence Livermore, near residential areas 40 miles from San Francisco, and the expansive Y-12 complex as among sites having significant security shortcomings.

“Both face serious physical security challenges, perhaps insurmountable challenges,” testified Danielle Brian, executive director of the Project on Government Oversight, a private watchdog group that has worked on security at weapons complex facilities with government whistle-blowers.

“Clearly they will not be able to comply with the new (security) directives,” Brian maintained.

In addition to Los Alamos, Lawrence Livermore and Y-13, weapons-grade nuclear materials are at the Hanford reservation in Washington state; Rocky Flats facility in Colorado; Savannah River complex in South Carolina; the Pantex facility in Texas; Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory; the Argonne National Laboratory in Idaho; and Sandia National Laboratory in New Mexico.

 
  Today's Top News     Top World News
 

US embassy visa call centre closed for illegal operation

 

   
 

Disaster monitoring satellites to be launched

 

   
 

Intervention in HK issues rejected

 

   
 

Workplace accidents down, but more deaths

 

   
 

WHO teams fly in on SARS mission

 

   
 

Photographer asks for compensation

 

   
  US warplanes hit insurgents in Fallujah
   
  4 dead in Syria gunfire at ex-UN office
   
  Thai police kill 24 in attacks in Muslim south
   
  Gadhafi makes historic visit to Europe
   
  Jordan: Major al Qaeda chemical plot foiled
   
  Israel identifies new Hamas leader
   
 
  Go to Another Section  
 
 
  Story Tools  
   
  Related Stories  
   
CIA chief: US lacks tools to combat al-Qaeda
   
FBI, Justice Dept. facing 9/11 panel
   
Bush was satisfied on pre-9/11 probes
   
Key White House memo is being declassified
   
9/11 panel head: findings will surprise
   
UK seizes 8 in biggest anti-terror sweep since 9/11
   
Rice rejects calls for public testimony
  News Talk  
  Will the new national flag fly?  
Advertisement
         
主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久久久久久久一次 | 亚洲网视频| 久久久精品久久久久久久久久久 | 亚洲男人的天堂在线观看 | 中文国产成人精品久久96 | 日本精品一区二区三区在线视频 | 国产在线高清视频 | 欧美黄色免费 | 欧美一级毛片片免费孕妇 | 精品视频 九九九 | 特级一级全黄毛片免费 | 草草草在线视频 | 欧美成人免费一级人片 | 久草经典视频 | 国产午夜免费不卡精品理论片 | 午夜影院黄色片 | 国产不卡在线播放 | 美女视频永久黄网站免费观看国产 | 欧美激情视频一区二区免费 | 午夜神马理论 | 一级一片免费播放 | 亚洲欧洲久久久精品 | 欧美视频在线观看免费精品欧美视频 | 91久久精品青青草原伊人 | 一区二区三区亚洲视频 | 国产一区二区在线播放 | 国内国产真实露脸对白 | 国产精品hd在线播放 | 一级做a爱过程免费观看 | 欧美成人a大片 | 精品手机在线视频 | 久久狠狠色狠狠色综合 | 成年人视频免费网站 | 国产精品亚洲精品一区二区三区 | 国产三级免费观看 | 亚洲国产日韩综合久久精品 | 欧美真人毛片动作视频 | 国产美女视频黄a视频全免费网站 | 国产欧美网站 | 国产黄色小视频在线观看 | 色一情|