www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

In the press

Updated: 2013-09-24 07:07

By Cho Wai(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

'Civil nomination' illegal

Civic Party leader Alan Leong Kah-kit, who is a big-shot lawyer by trade, said on a radio program the other day that he "cannot see" how the "civil nomination" format proposed by the Alliance for True Democracy and his party violates the Basic Law: "If you take a look at Article 45 of the Basic Law, it says very clearly that Chief Executive (CE) election candidates shall be nominated by a broadly representative nomination committee through a democratic process."

Leong's words are totally meant to mislead the public, because the Basic Law contains nothing about "civil nomination" and he was attempting to reduce the nomination committee to a rubber stamp. That is why it goes against the Basic Law and relevant decisions of the National People's Congress Standing Committee.

Zhang Xiaoming, director of the Liaison Office of the Central People's Government in the Hong Kong SAR, pointed out in a written reply to Leong earlier this month that "civil nomination" totally ignores relevant provisions of the Basic Law, adding that "legal professionals should know better than others the importance of the rule of law and never cross the line." It appears Leong has abandoned the basic code of conduct of legal professionals in order to satisfy his own political needs.

Article 45 of the Basic Law stipulates that the ultimate goal of Hong Kong's democratic development is the election of the CE and members of the Legislative Council (LegCo) by universal suffrage; and CE election candidates will be nominated by "a broadly representative nomination committee", meaning it will be an institutional nomination process instead of an individual one.

"Civil nomination", on the other hand, relies on individual voters and anyone who has collected a certain number or more of voter signatures can stand for CE election. If "civil nomination" is adopted the term "broadly representative" will be irrelevant, as the nomination committee is redundant. In that case shouldn't the Basic Law be rewritten with "civil nomination" replacing references to the nomination committee?

The author is a current affairs commentator. This is an excerpted translation of his column published in Wen Wei Po on Sept 23.

In the press

(HK Edition 09/24/2013 page1)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 在线免费观看亚洲 | 久久精品国产精品亚洲人人 | 亚洲精品久久久午夜伊人 | 91成人免费视频 | 久久99精品久久久久久h | 国产一级大片免费看 | 5388国产亚洲欧美在线观看 | 日韩黄色片在线观看 | 日韩成人午夜 | 中国一级毛片在线观看 | 青草欧美| 美女舒服好紧太爽了视频 | 欧美成人高清免费大片观看 | 亚洲欧美一级视频 | 在线久草视频 | 精品久久久久久久久久久久久久久 | 成人免费视频在线 | 欧美ab片| 国产三级视频在线播放 | 91香蕉国产亚洲一区二区三区 | 精品国产区 | 亚洲伊人久久综合影院2021 | 久在线视频| 91极品尤物 | 黄.www| 亚洲天堂视频在线 | 一级做a爰片性色毛片小说 一级做a爰片性色毛片中国 | 一个人看的www日本高清视频 | 精品9e精品视频在线观看 | 91成人在线免费视频 | 成免费网站| 欧美成人另类69 | 亚洲小视频在线 | 亚洲欧美日韩国产vr在线观 | 亚洲bt欧美bt国产bt | 2020黄网| 日本三级网站在线观看 | 黄色影院在线观看视频 | 国内精品免费一区二区三区 | 日本aaa成人毛片 | 一级毛片aaa片免费观看 |