www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

Limits of speech freedom

Updated: 2013-10-22 07:09

By Ho Lok-Sang(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

Hong Kong people treasure freedom of speech and press freedom for a good reason. They think that it is human nature to want to speak one's mind, and to hate to say things against one's true beliefs. Hong Kong people also think that press freedom is essential to knowing what really goes on. In the absence of press freedom, it is possible that the media might present a biased picture of the reality, and that some officials may get away with power abuses, favoritism, and other wrongdoings.

Sadly, however, some people seem to be abusing this precious freedom. It is heart-breaking to see some netizens pour abusive words on another human being who has done absolutely nothing wrong. Stephanie Liu Han, a top student from Yunnan, who graduated from the University of Hong Kong two years ago having earned a full scholarship on outstanding academic merits, and who worked in the city's financial industry, was killed in a traffic accident. Instead of expressing sympathy as a normal human being would, some netizens made outrageous and disturbing remarks.

While she was in intensive care, one netizen remarked: "Quickly take her back to Zhina (a derogative name for China). Otherwise we would be losing medical fees on her behalf."

"Having grabbed a place in the university at the expense of HK people, she now occupies a hospital bed. Soon she may be pre-empting a place in the columbarium. The Chinese really are overbearing!"

"Punishment from heaven!"

Limits of speech freedom

There is nothing we can do if people choose to say these things privately. But these words are posted on the Internet. A good question is whether abusive language that hurt people should be banned from publication: on the Internet, in newspapers, or on TV. Will this compromise press freedom?

Perhaps there should be limits to freedom of speech and freedom of the press. Language that hurts other people is really not much different from physical assault that hurts other people. In both cases there is an actor, an act, and a victim. There should be no presumption that physical injury necessarily hurts more than "mental injury". In principle, people should not be allowed to arbitrarily hurt others.

But who is to determine if someone has been hurt? Unlike physical injury which can be objectively assessed, it is not easy to demonstrate that someone has been hurt by language, and to what extent. If a government department is to take up this role, people will worry about arbitrary censorship. The alternative is to set up an independent commission or committee, one that has credibility for its professionalism and independence, and to have it determine if the bounds of reason and common sense consideration have been violated.

Limits of speech freedom

An "Independent Commission on the Limits of Free Speech", when given clear terms of reference and formed under due process, will pose no threat to press freedom as a means to check against power abuses from government officials or from big businesses. In order for it to function, it will have to have the power to lay charges on violators of the principles of free speech. In order to give it credibility, the appointees, which may be nominated by the government or by the civil society, should be ratified by the Legislative Council. The terms of reference should make it clear that it is not aimed at political expressions, but at malicious, discriminatory, exploitative, or hate-inducing language expressed through the mass media including the Internet.

The recent rise of negative sentiments against new immigrants and tourists from the mainland is often justified on grounds that "they have not paid taxes in Hong Kong". I would like to ask those who express such opinion if they wanted a system of discrimination based on how much tax people pay. I would like to ask those who wrote such harsh words against Liu Han if he/she wanted to see a world in which Hong Kong students were denied the opportunities to study abroad, or opportunities for scholarships.

Hong Kong claims to be a global city. We need to abandon insular views and instead espouse the values of a global city. If we do well, we can set a good example for the world.

The author is a director of the Center for Public Policy Studies at Lingnan University.

(HK Edition 10/22/2013 page1)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 成人午夜视频免费观看 | 一级毛片美国一级j毛片不卡 | 美日韩一区二区三区 | 免费国产视频在线观看 | 日本高清色本在线www | 亚洲视频2| 日韩高清在线播放不卡 | 免费在线看黄网址 | a级国产乱理伦片在线观看国 | 亚洲精品国自产拍在线观看 | 亚洲成人国产 | 大焦伊人 | 色在线免费视频 | aaaaaa级特色特黄的毛片 | 欧美日韩国产高清一区二区三区 | 91精品观看91久久久久久 | 免费日韩在线视频 | 欧美性色生活片免费播放 | 日韩欧美视频一区二区三区 | 欧美国产一区二区三区 | 欧美国产精品久久 | 国产一级一片免费播放i | 国产一级视频免费 | 久久久国产精品视频 | 欧美精品videos | 国产精品国产高清国产专区 | 精品在线一区 | 欧美一区二区在线视频 | 亚欧色 | 欧美成人三级视频 | 亚洲欧美日韩精品香蕉 | 久久一二 | 欧美日产国产亚洲综合图区一 | 国产无套视频在线观看香蕉 | 两性午夜视频 | 亚洲一区二区影院 | 日本一道免费一区二区三区 | a一级毛片免费高清在线 | 亚洲日本视频在线 | 男女配种猛烈免费视频 | 欧美国产视频 |