www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

Tariff adjustments: Perception and reality

Updated: 2014-04-03 07:36

By Raymond So(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

Tariff adjustments: Perception and reality

Tariff adjustments by public utility enterprises in Hong Kong are always controversial. Every year the two power companies and the MTR Corporation ask for price adjustments. This has become usual practice. To many people, such fare adjustments are bad news. Often, they voice their discontent and many opinion leaders also advocate tougher controls on public utility companies by the government. However, this request for greater government controls over price adjustments is without grounds.

Any price adjustments by public enterprises should be legal, reasonable and acceptable. However, the public often does not believe they are. This, therefore, makes price adjustments by public utility enterprises a never ending source of debate.

From a legal perspective, price adjustments by all public utility enterprises are lawful. Take the Scheme of Control (SoC) Agreement of the two power companies. The SoC specifies the requirements on the operations of the two power companies, and the way to calculate a return. Every detail contained in the SoC, signed between the government and the power companies, is legally binding. So for the power companies, the annual tariff adjustment is a legitimate claim outlined in the SoC document. So when the two power companies request a tariff adjustment in accordance with requirements of the SoC, it is totally legal. In Hong Kong, we respect the rule of law and have strong sense of contract enforcement. Hence, we cannot deny the rights of the power companies to adjust tariffs.

The situation involving other public utility enterprises is similar. The MTR has a Fare Adjustment Mechanism which was passed by the Legislative Council. Kowloon Motor Bus Co has a similar mechanism. Even the Housing Authority has a system of rental adjustments for public housing. Therefore, requests for price adjustments by public utility enterprises are all legal.

Tariff adjustments: Perception and reality

The request for price adjustments by public enterprises come from cost increases. When we examine requests by public enterprises, it is not surprising to find cost increases are the most cited reason for such a request. In current years, inflation is a real concern and no doubt operating costs of public utility enterprises rise. Take the two power companies as an example. The power tariff contains an element called fuel adjustment - which is actually the cost of fuel. If fuel cost rises, the power companies can, and have the right to, pass this increase on to consumers. Also, if the increase in tariffs is mainly due to increases in costs (and the power companies are not requesting higher prices for higher profits) it is not unreasonable for the two power companies to ask for tariff raises. Whether people agree about this is another matter.

The real problem lies in the acceptability of price increases by public utility enterprises. For most Hong Kong people, the public utility enterprises appear to be earning huge profits year after year. Yet, they still ask for price increases. This gives people the impression the profits of public enterprises are excessive. However, this is more a perception than a reality. Nevertheless, it is this perception which causes problems. Even though public enterprises are legitimate and have good reasons for price increases, people cannot accept those increases. When public enterprises are talking about their legal rights, people also cannot accept their arguments. They will look at the issue of acceptability rather than of legitimacy and reason. This has happened year after year, and there is no sign of any solution yet.

The real danger of such contradictory views is the public has very different views from the elites on controversial issues. This also illustrates how difficult it is to pursue public policies. Traditional ways of legitimacy and reason are still practiced by many elites and government officials in formulating public policies. However, the public mostly focuses on perception and acceptability. No wonder conflict occurs. The government will always have a hard time fighting public opinion based on perceptions. There are many tough battles ahead.

The author is dean of the School of Business at Hang Seng Management College.

(HK Edition 04/03/2014 page9)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 成人123 | 成人午夜在线观看国产 | 亚洲国产片在线观看 | 一级爱做片免费观看久久 | 精品亚洲综合久久中文字幕 | 欧美成人h精品网站 | 亚洲二区在线播放 | 九色国产在线 | 亚洲欧美成人影院 | 91资源在线观看 | 综合 91在线精品 | 亚洲第一中文 | 国产成年人在线观看 | 一区在线免费观看 | 成人福利网站在线看视频 | 欧美一级在线全免费 | 国产一区二区三区免费大片天美 | 黄网国产| 在线免费观看欧美 | 996热这里有精品青青草原 | 狠狠色综合久久丁香婷婷 | 亚洲小视频 | 亚洲综合精品一区二区三区中文 | 国产自在自线午夜精品视频在 | 成人在线免费观看网站 | 国产成人精品一区二区免费 | 香港三级日本三级妇人三级 | 一级做a爱过程免费视频麻豆 | 草久在线视频 | 久久久久久久久久久96av | 91九色成人 | 五月色婷婷综合开心网亚 | 免费人成在线观看网站品爱网 | 亚洲欧美日韩综合二区三区 | 欧美性色黄在线视 | 91精品久久久久久久久久 | a级成人高清毛片 | 国产精品免费一级在线观看 | 国产裸体美女视频全黄 | 三级全黄视频 | 亚洲欧美日韩精品在线 |