www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

Criticism of HK grossly misplaced

Updated: 2014-06-09 07:10

(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

The first reaction of most of us to the recent criticisms against Hong Kong being laid at our doorstep by the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) is to marvel that its members couldn't find far bigger problems in the globe's political hotspots.

CESCR attributed these five "sins" to Hong Kong: poor treatment of asylum seekers, new immigrants, ethnic minorities, foreign domestic workers and sexual minorities.

In the interests of saving space let's concentrate on our treatment of asylum seekers. Between the late 1940s and the mid-1950s the population of Hong Kong doubled from 2.2 million to 4.4 million as a result of the breathtaking influx of, mostly Cantonese-speaking, peasants flooding over the border hoping to find a more prosperous future here.

Month after month the influx averaged 100,000 men, women and children! And unbelievably Hong Kong squeezed them all in. Admittedly they had no choice but to house themselves in the hillside squatter settlements that sprang up on the outskirts of urban districts on either side of Victoria Harbour. And after grimly gaining this "toehold" they had then to eke out a livelihood.

Life was very tough in those shanty towns, especially for the mothers and children. Nevertheless, local church organizations and charitable groups, although overwhelmed by the enormity of the problem, still managed to provide a significant degree of help.

The government of the day simply didn't have the funds to offer much assistance. The economy was struggling to recover from the Japanese occupation of 1942-45, which had brought commerce to a halt. Then, just as a modest export trade was beginning to develop, the Korean War (1950-53) broke out and nobody wanted to buy products tainted with Asian origins.

But as international demand for cheap products eventually overcame such prejudices and trade began to prosper the refugees, and their children, were to provide the manpower and muscle for what would eventually burgeon into the Hong Kong economic miracle.

As its finances improved the government gradually reached a position where it could begin to close down the squatter settlements and re-house those tenacious families in resettlement estates across urban Hong Kong. The first was built at Shek Kip Mei following the horrendous squatter fire there that left 50,000-plus homeless and sleeping in the streets during the freezing weather of Christmas 1953.

Fast forward 20 or so years and Hong Kong was again temporarily accommodating another influx of asylum seekers - boatload after boatload of Vietnamese refugees from their war-torn country. From 1975 we took in a quarter of a million of them, some of whom could not be resettled overseas despite the efforts of then British colonial administration. Not until 1999 was that financially draining, socially and politically disruptive problem finally settled, with 143,700 being resettled while the remaining 67,000 had to be repatriated to their homeland.

This was how Hong Kong, twice, went far beyond all normal expectations of humanitarian aid rendered to homeless and vulnerable refugees.

The figures add up to refuge in Hong Kong having been granted to almost 2.5 million people. Furthermore, if we take into account the fact that Hong Kong's area, including scores of uninhabitable islands, totals only around 400 square miles (1,000 square km), it is without doubt the greatest act of humanitarian charity by a state or territory in modern history.

In the circumstances would all members of CESCR kindly take note that, instead of being guilty of "poor treatment" of asylum seekers, we can say with pride that no other territory in the world has achieved anything remotely approaching our charity towards refugees in general. But instead of praise we hear in the background the clamor of critics saying, "No, no, no - we are not talking about what happened before; forget all that. It's your present failings which are so wrong."

They complain that since taking over responsibility for refugees from the UN last March, Hong Kong has made refugee-related procedures "difficult". The fact is that the refugee problem of our current times is beyond any single territory's capacity to resolve, bearing in mind the undisguised anti-refugee sentiment of many countries.

Australia helped greatly in accepting large numbers of Vietnamese; however, it has now had enough of boatloads of queue-jumping refugees and is sending them back to Indonesia, where smuggling people to Australia by sea had become a growth industry.

Australia's tough new stance has seen Canberra cut deals with Papua New Guinea and even Cambodia to re-house earlier batches of these unwelcome boat people.

Finally, let's not forget that every year Hong Kong spends more than HK$500 million in providing food, welfare, legal aid and other services to the 6,000 refugees already here, mainly from Africa and South Asia.

The author is the op-ed editor with China Daily Hong Kong Edition.

(HK Edition 06/09/2014 page1)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲视频在线一区二区 | 一区二区国产精品 | 成人高清无遮挡免费视频软件 | 亚洲一区二区三 | 午夜看片a福利在线 | 综合视频在线 | 欧美成人免费在线 | 久热精品男人的天堂在线视频 | 中文字幕在线看 | 欧美一级毛片免费观看视频 | 久久精品国产99国产精品免费看 | 欧美一级毛片免费观看视频 | 国内外成人免费在线视频 | 波多野结衣在线免费观看视频 | 久久久久久亚洲精品影院 | 国产自产21区 | 在线日韩中文字幕 | 成年人免费网站视频 | 9191精品国产免费不久久 | 免费一级做a爰片性色毛片 免费一极毛片 | 日本一级高清不卡视频在线 | 午夜精品免费 | 91高端极品外围在线观看 | 成人久久网 | 91亚洲综合 | 国产成人精品日本亚洲网站 | 欧美性猛交xxxxxxxx软件 | 色综合a怡红院怡红院首页 色综合精品久久久久久久 色综合九九 | 亚洲视频在线免费看 | 午夜桃色剧场 | 久久99久久99精品免观看 | 亚洲精品中文字幕久久久久久 | 在线一区免费视频播放 | 成年人网站免费视频 | 精品国产免费观看 | 日韩 国产 欧美视频一区二区三区 | 国产日本韩国不卡在线视频 | 拍拍拍又黄又爽无挡视频免费 | 日本无遮 | 欧美一级久久 | 亚洲qingse中文久久网 |