www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

Why the rule of law must never be compromised

Updated: 2014-10-29 07:09

By Zhou Bajun(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

Why the rule of law must never be compromised

The Communist Party of China (CPC) issued a communique on "comprehensively advancing ruling the country according to the law" at its Fourth Plenum of the 18th Party Congress. This blueprint for reforming China's legal system was roundly criticized by Western media outlets. But to some extent they also acknowledged that China would streamline its legal system, while emphasizing the importance of its Constitution.

But, here in Hong Kong, having implemented Western-style rule of law for more than a century, the opposition camp is now jeopardizing the cornerstone of the legal system by demanding so-called genuine democracy. The behavior of the opposition camp is also widely applauded by the Western media.

The first and most important cornerstone of the Hong Kong SAR is the national Constitution and the Basic Law. When the opposition camp proposed public nomination for Chief Executive (CE) candidates, before the National People's Congress Standing Committee's (NPCSC) Aug 31 announcement of its landmark decision on political reform, it was defying the Basic Law. Following the announcement of the NPCSC's decision, this defiant attitude worsened. Some "Occupy Central" supporters could be heard exclaiming: "The NPCSC should withdraw its Aug 31 decision."

The second, but no less important cornerstone of the HKSAR, is public order. Since "Occupy" was officially launched on Sept 28, protesters have exceeded the acceptable boundaries for expressing "freedom of speech" in Hong Kong by disrupting public order.

The police have suffered some serious attacks over the past month. Thousands of police officers on the front line have endured verbal and physical assaults. They have done this while working up to 20 hours a day coping with the "Occupy" protests. Only a few police officers have behaved inappropriately. They did this in the face of unprecedented pressure - yet the opposition camp has frequently criticized the police.

More seriously, not only the police, but also the courts have been treated with contempt. On Oct 20, the High Court granted three groups - a taxi drivers' group, a minibus operators' group and Goldon Investment - injunctions against barricades set up by protesters in Mong Kok and Admiralty. Nevertheless, the protesters, in defiance of the court, refused to move. The incident marks an appalling precedent in the history of the rule of law in Hong Kong.

Although "Occupy" campaigners are contemptuously breaking the law, the government has patiently negotiated with them to persuade the occupiers to withdraw. In her dialogue with representatives of the student protesters on Oct 21, Chief Secretary Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor said the government would submit a report to Beijing relaying the protesters' concerns. It would also consider setting up a platform for dialogue on constitutional development, she said. But only a few hours after the talks, these suggestions were rejected. The opposition camp also advocates the introduction of public nomination as the method for selecting candidates for CE election by universal suffrage in 2017 and the end of functional constituencies from the 2016 Legislative Council election onwards.

Essentially, the opposition camp is fighting for so-called genuine democracy at the expense of the rule of law. Don't the "Occupy" protesters understand that in the West the rule of law is the cornerstone of democracy? Yes. They believe in Western democracy and they are not stupid. Many protesters involved in "Occupy" understand that protesters in the United States or Europe have been treated far more harshly by police in those countries.

Examples of such treatment are many - from the recent presence of heavily armed police on the streets of Ferguson, Missouri, following the killing of African American teenager Michael Brown, to the death of Ian Tomlinson, a newspaper vendor struck and killed by a police officer in London while walking home during the 2009 G20 protests.

With "Occupy" spinning out of control, Tung Chee-hwa, the first CE made a statement on Oct 24. He advised the students protesting on the streets to return home. Tung told the occupiers, "The rule of law is the cornerstone of Hong Kong's success. We can't violate the rule of law while pursuing democracy."

When the rule of law is being exchanged for so-called genuine democracy, then not only universal suffrage in 2017 but the economy itself will be jeopardized. Hotel bookings and credit-card spending in Hong Kong have dropped 20 to 30 percent since "Occupy" started. As long as this continues, investment in Hong Kong will be greatly diminished.

Democracy benefits all citizens. However, Hong Kong people are bearing the economic consequences of "Occupy". It's time they, and the government, decided to end "Occupy".

The author is a veteran current affairs commentator.

(HK Edition 10/29/2014 page10)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲图片偷拍区 | 99久久99这里只有免费费精品 | 精产网红自拍在线 | 国产精品久久久久久影院 | 亚洲国产三级 | 欧美精品在线视频 | 国产日韩精品欧美一区喷 | theav视频在线观看 | 91成人免费在线视频 | 1717she国产精品免费视频 | 欧美高清免费一级在线 | 美女张开腿让男人桶的动态图 | 亚洲影视一区二区 | 一级片日韩 | 久久久日本久久久久123 | 国产精品极品美女自在线看免费一区二区 | 亚洲国产精品免费观看 | 国产精品18久久久久久小说 | 综合久色 | 成人国产精品免费软件 | 久久色婷婷 | 九九视频在线免费观看 | 性高湖久久久久久久久aaaaa | 三级黄色免费看 | 美女扒开腿让男人桶 | 欧美成人免费观看 | 国内自拍欧美 | 久久久久久久免费视频 | 日产国产精品久久久久久 | a级高清观看视频在线看 | 欧美精品亚洲精品日韩 | 精品久久久久久久 | 成人满18在线观看网站免费 | 亚洲国产剧情在线精品视 | 中文字幕在线乱码不卡区区 | 亚洲欧美小视频 | 手机看片精品国产福利盒子 | a级毛片毛片免费很很综合 a级毛片免费 | 国产欧美日韩在线观看 | 人人爽人人香蕉 | 一本久道久久综合中文字幕 |