www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

Decolonization - cure for HK's woes?

Updated: 2015-09-30 09:48

By Regina IP(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

Regina IP writes that while colonial features were written into the Basic Law, HK should seek new systems for the years ahead while embracing its destiny as part of China

At a recent public forum in Hong Kong, Chen Zuo'er, chairman of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macao Studies, dropped a bombshell by attributing Hong Kong's lackluster economic performance to its failure to "decolonize", while at the same time allowing attempts to "de-sinofy" to spread in Hong Kong.

Chen's statements sparked much concern about the central authorities' intentions. Do his remarks herald actions in the pipeline to decolonize, in the sense of dismantling the separate systems in Hong Kong?

My view is, for as long as the Basic Law is in force, decolonization in the form of removing the "colonial" features of Hong Kong's governance system, however outdated and objectionable, would be hard to accomplish. That is because many of these features have been written into the Basic Law, and cannot be excised without major surgery.

Take for example the Legislative Council's annual debate on the Chief Executive's policy address. This practice is based on the British parliamentary tradition of the State Opening of Parliament, on which occasion the Queen delivers a speech outlining the government's agenda, and the two houses of Parliament debate her speech. The vote in the House of Lords on the motion to thank the Queen for her "Gracious Speech" is a formality and passes unanimously. The vote in the House of Commons on the motion has never failed.

By contrast, the opposition in Hong Kong's legislature has turned the formality of a vote to thank the CE for delivering his annual policy address into an opportunity for attacking the government and humiliating the CE. The requirement in Annex II to the Basic Law that motions introduced by legislators must require a simple majority vote in both the functional and geographical groups of legislators present makes it hard for pro-government legislators to secure passage of the vote of thanks motion.

Another remnant of colonial practice is the public finance management ideology enshrined in Article 107 of the Basic Law, which prescribes that the government must keep expenditure within the limits of its revenues in drawing up its budget. Though well-intentioned, such a provision fosters a highly conservative, risk-averse mentality among the public officers responsible for public finance management, and takes away the government's flexibility in using public funds to boost the economy in times of economic downturn. It provides legal cover for the resistance on the part of many senior officials to discard the "small government" philosophy of the colonial era, or to use the vast resources at the disposal of the government to steer and reshape the economy.

The incorporation of such colonial practices and ideology into the Basic Law stems from the well-intentioned desire to maintain in Hong Kong, under "One Country, Two Systems", the separate systems which worked well in the colonial era, and which should be preserved in order to maintain Hong Kong's prosperity, stability, vibrancy, and the people's confidence.

In hindsight, a major problem of the Basic Law is that it was drafted very much with a view to preserving old systems and practices rather than ushering in new systems consonant with Hong Kong's new reality as a part of China. In other words, too much clinging to the past but not enough envisioning of the systems that would truly work well for Hong Kong under "One Country". Too much clinging to the old systems means that Hong Kong has not been able to adapt to the transformational change which has taken place in the country in the past 18 years, and the consequential change in Hong Kong's place in the rest of the country and in the world.

Naturally, "One Country, Two Systems" being a new, bold and innovative concept, it was very hard for the Basic Law drafters to have a very clear vision of what would work well under this arrangement. "One Country, Two Systems" is a work in progress, and it behoves all of us who have lived through the changes in the past 20 years and witnessed the difficulties in implementation to think hard about what systems would best suit Hong Kong in the years ahead.

Chen Zuo'er was certainly right when he stressed that the forces to "de-sinofy" Hong Kong, that is to remove Hong Kong's Chinese characteristics, would only hurt both the "country" and the "separate systems". "One Country" and "Two Systems" are closely intertwined: Hong Kong cannot survive without its motherland and Hong Kong's separate systems would be weakened if the nation lost faith in them.

The cure for Hong Kong's woes is not a simple move to decolonize, but a wake-up call for Hong Kong people to embrace their destiny as part of China. Hong Kong can always be a very special part of China with its unique advantages and characteristics, but it would continue to be mired in restlessness and internal divisions if it were unable to come to terms with that reality.

Decolonization - cure for HK's woes?

(HK Edition 09/30/2015 page10)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 一级成人a毛片免费播放 | 99久久精品免费看国产四区 | 美女视频黄a视频美女大全 美女视频黄a视频免费全程 | 欧美成人四级hd版 | 亚洲人成在线播放网站岛国 | 欧美激情精品久久久久久久九九九 | 国产精品午夜国产小视频 | 成人合集大片bd高清在线观看 | 1717she国产精品免费视频 | 精品国产区一区二区三区在线观看 | 久久久www成人免费精品 | 亚洲 欧美 精品专区 极品 | 欧美成人免费 | 亚洲观看视频 | 国产亚洲精品九九久在线观看 | 国产亚洲精品一区二区在线播放 | 久久久久久网址 | 中文字幕人成不卡一区 | 国产免费人视频在线观看免费 | 亚洲涩涩精品专区 | 欧美成人精品在线 | 久久久久99精品成人片三人毛片 | 久久97视频 | 亚洲成人第一页 | 亚洲精品第五页中文字幕 | 亚洲久草视频 | 久久成人a毛片免费观看网站 | 国产在线综合一区二区三区 | 一区二区三区四区在线播放 | 国产亚洲一区二区三区 | 波多野结衣视频在线观看 | 国产高清免费在线 | 2022年国产精品久久久久 | 高h原耽肉汁动漫视频 | 精品视频一二三区 | 久久精品国产免费一区 | 一级作爱视频免费观看 | 欧美成人影院在线观看三级 | 久久只有精品视频 | 亚洲高清视频在线播放 | 黄色在线视屏 |