www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

Effective retirement protection calls for systemic approach

Updated: 2015-12-30 08:23

By Lau Nai-keung(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

After years of debate, the government has finally released a consultation paper on a retirement protection scheme. The paper features two scenarios known as a universal "regardless of rich or poor" option and a non-universal "those with financial needs" option. The elderly would receive HK$3,230 per month under both schemes. However, for the means-tested option, those eligible would be elderly singles with assets not exceeding HK$80,000 and a monthly income of no more than HK$7,340, and married elderly couples with assets not exceeding HK$125,000 and a combined monthly income of no more than HK$11,830.

The two options obviously have different financial implications. According to the government's estimation, the universal option would cost HK$22.6 billion in 2015, growing to HK$56.3 billion in 2064 and leading to an overall increase in public expenditure of about HK$2.4 trillion over 50 years. On the other hand, the non-universal, means-tested option would only lead to an overall increase in public expenditure of HK$255.5 billion in the same time period. In other words, the means-tested option would cost only one-tenth the amount of the universal version.

How the government came up with the financial forecast is a mystery, though technically speaking the assumptions and formulas were certainly buried somewhere in the consultation paper. Anyway, you do not have to be a genius to know which scheme the government wants the public to support.

Interestingly enough, in order to fund the retirement protection scheme, the government is proposing to hike taxes or introduce new ones, an idea that reminds us of a previous and unfruitful consultation exercise. Listing greater taxation as a possible funding source, knowing the near-zero possibility of its being accepted by the politicians and the general public, seems too grossly negligent to be sincere.

The current cohort of impoverished elderly grew up in the 1930s and 1940s. They are poor because they grew up in the early period of colonial Hong Kong, when times were very harsh, and they were not educated. If future cohorts of elderly find themselves poor, they would be so because of quite different reasons. Instead of wars and social upheavals, they would have the Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) to blame. They are poor because the government favors capital so much that it hurts the labor force.

In a sense, the current consultation is an admission of the MPF's failure. A properly designed mandatory pension scheme should be able to adequately cover everyone who has worked a sufficient number of years in their prime. They should be able to receive a monthly pension, the size of which varies to reflect what they earned when employed but with a minimum amount set to guarantee a decent livelihood in old age, which can also be combined with other social security provisions.

Public demand for a better retirement protection scheme suggests that our values have changed. The current cohort of elderly ran from the war and came to Hong Kong for shelter. The concept of welfare was alien to them. That is why many would rather salvage recyclable trash than go to the government. Believe me, later cohorts of elderly will not be doing that.

This requires us to rethink our overall approach to the redistribution of wealth. Some point out that Article 108 of the Basic Law asks us to take "the low tax policy previously pursued in Hong Kong as reference". They then remind us that Article 107 of the Basic Law states: "The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall follow the principle of keeping expenditure within the limits of revenues in drawing up its budget."

Taken together, these two articles can be construed to resist any change. However, we should note that the low tax policy previously pursued is merely a "reference". And while it is common sense that in the long run one should not and cannot spend more than one earns, it does not mean that we cannot draw up a budget deficit in the short run to achieve specific objectives. The lesson here is that we have to approach this issue in a systemic manner. In order to design an effective solution, we have to acknowledge the fact that an aging population and poverty are two distinct but interrelated problems which the government ultimately has to confront.

Effective retirement protection calls for systemic approach

(HK Edition 12/30/2015 page9)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 成人看片黄a毛片 | 国产成人在线视频播放 | 免费在线亚洲视频 | 国产深夜福利在线观看网站 | 国产大乳孕妇喷奶水在线观看 | 日韩经典中文字幕 | 韩国一级做a爰片性色毛片 韩国一区在线 | 久久欧美| 91探花福利精品国产自产在线 | 亚洲精品久久久午夜伊人 | 在线看毛片网站 | 在线观看视频国产 | 欧美日韩一区二区三区免费 | 亚洲自拍小视频 | 亚洲欧美日韩精品在线 | 麻豆日韩 | 欧美亚洲综合另类在线观看 | 伊人黄色片 | 男人和女人的做刺激性视频 | 久久亚洲精品一区成人 | 成人av手机在线观看 | 欧美日韩在线观看免费 | 免费一级肉体全黄毛片高清 | 国产精品久久一区二区三区 | ffyybb免费福利视频 | 亚洲国语在线视频手机在线 | 成人精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲一区区 | 久久久网久久久久合久久久久 | 九草视频| 在线观看亚洲 | 秘书高跟黑色丝袜国产91在线 | 日韩欧一级毛片在线播无遮挡 | 亚洲欧美在线精品一区二区 | 国产欧美综合一区二区 | 成年人免费网站在线观看 | 国产精品久久视频 | 国产女厕所 | 91精品国产91热久久p | 三级在线网站 | 成人免费毛片网站 |