www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

Developing a better pension scheme for our elderly citizens

Updated: 2016-01-06 09:56

By Zhou Bajun(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

When Chris Patten, the last British governor of Hong Kong, raised the issue of introducing a universal pension system in Hong Kong shortly before the handover, the move was widely perceived as being politically motivated. It was, therefore, quickly rejected by many people in society. Back then, those born after World War II were in their prime and the problem of the growing aging population was not so serious. With the local economy doing well, the incomes of most employees and their families were still rising. People were much more concerned about the establishment of a citywide mandatory pension fund system than some half-hearted gesture.

Today, however, it is a completely different situation after the SAR government launched the first round of public consultation on improving Hong Kong's retirement pension system last month. Psychologically, people could not be more eager to have some kind of old-age financial assurance in place before retirement. This is because the growing aging population problem persists while the income gap keeps growing. The Mandatory Provident Fund, set up in December 2000, has fallen far behind the rising cost of living for the great majority of retirees.

A "universal" pension system for everybody, regardless of financial means, had already dominated public opinion before the government launched its consultation exercise. This consists of two options for the public to consider. Obviously, the opposition camp will find fault with the details of the government's plan even if it leans toward being a "universal pension". So it is little wonder their reaction to the government's consultation paper has been so uniformly negative - as the opposition favors retirement protection for the "poor" only.

The two competing options are fundamentally different from the beginning. One is for everybody (regardless of financial means) and is undoubtedly oriented toward people's right to a retirement pension. But the other is welfare-oriented and requires a means test to determine whether a person qualifies for it or not. The government told the public it favors the welfare-oriented option before it launched the consultation drive.

Respecting and caring for senior citizens is a Chinese tradition. Mencius (372-289 BC) famously said in one of his teachings that people should treat old people like family. We as a nation also believe people should be cared for when they are old. This is so they do not feel forgotten and feel they can still be useful. Retirement protection is, therefore, a common way for societies to care for their old people.

When discussing material provisions, a pension scheme should not just be limited to "poverty alleviation" for poor senior citizens. The current SAR government, by assigning the universal pension scheme consultation to the Commission on Poverty made a wrong start. It ultimately reduced retirement protection to just another charity fund. I do not think the government can talk itself out of this blunder.

The true intent of a universal pension scheme is to ensure all retirees live with dignity and are cared for. Such care should not differentiate between the "poor" and other people. Society must show respect and gratitude to all those who have contributed to it.

I understand the current SAR government's concerns about the public coffers if a universal pension scheme is adopted. Legitimate as these concerns are, they should not be used as an excuse to dominate the public consultation. Instead, the government should respect the true intent of retirement protection and highlight the compassionate aspect of this. It has to do whatever is necessary so retirees feel they are receiving the help they deserve. This must not be just some gesture of pity for the needy.

Do not forget there are many retirees whose means are not low enough to qualify for the government-favored pension scheme or high enough to live comfortably without it. This "middle group" deserves attention also. The government should add an in-between option to ensure that "well-to-do" retirees are not just left to their own means for the sake of the public coffers. It is a good thing that the government plans to help retirees secure a stable income one way or another. They should just not take too long to reveal their plans.

Developing a better pension scheme for our elderly citizens <BR>

(HK Edition 01/06/2016 page9)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 996热这里有精品青青草原 | 亚洲欧美人妖另类激情综合区 | 国产精品亚洲二区 | 伊人色在线视频 | 欧美成人高清在线视频大全 | 香港经典a毛片免费观看看 香港经典a毛片免费观看爽爽影院 | 精品在线网站 | 国产在线观看精品香蕉v区 国产在线观看免费人成小说 | 亚洲一区二区三区四区在线观看 | 亚洲欧美在线不卡 | 久久久亚洲精品蜜桃臀 | 日韩在线视频不卡一区二区三区 | 久久久久久久久久综合情日本 | 99久在线| 免看一级一片一在线看 | 免费男女乱淫真视频播放 | 在线欧美色 | 国产高清视频免费在线观看 | 亚洲视频中文字幕在线 | 97影院理论在线观看 | 男人使劲躁女人视频小v | 草草草在线观看 | 国产成人精品福利网站在线 | 一区二区三区免费高清视频 | 欧美做a一级视频免费观看 欧美做爱毛片 | 亚洲精品天堂一区在线观看 | 国产一级久久久久久毛片 | 亚洲视频天堂 | 欧美亚洲综合网 | 美女张开腿男人桶 | 欧美成人香蕉网在线观看 | 国产精品观看 | 欧美在线一级毛片视频 | 亚洲欧美一区二区久久香蕉 | 97影院理论片 | 久草在线视频网 | 久久精品国产亚洲精品2020 | 日韩日b视频| 国产激情久久久久影 | 欧美一级xxxx俄罗斯一级 | 国产一二三区在线观看 |