www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

The case for raising public healthcare fees

Updated: 2016-12-20 07:05

By Ho Lok-sang(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

Ho Lok-sang says the Hospital Authority is right to raise the fees which it charges on health services, but adds that a cap on a person's annual expenses is also needed

The Hospital Authority (HA) recently proposed raising the fees it charges on health services, which have not changed for many years. The proposed raises are appropriate, but this should go hand in hand with introducing an annual cap on eligible healthcare expenses for each patient. This annual cap can be regarded as the "annual deductible" that people have to pay before the benefits of the "public insurance plan" kicks in.

I have argued that the HA is like a giant "health maintenance organization" that provides insurance to every Hong Kong citizen and offers medical services at the same time. Hong Kong people do not pay an explicit insurance premium, but actually are paying such a premium indirectly through the tax system. The poor of course do not pay much tax, but even in Taiwan, where everybody is covered by the public insurance plan, the poor can pay reduced premiums or may even be exempt from the payment. According to the official website, "the percentage of the premium paid by the insured for each category varies from 0 percent for low income citizens to 100 percent for the self-employed."

I have been advocating fee raises along with putting a cap on patients' eligible healthcare since I first made the proposal in my book Health Care Financing and Delivery: A Model for Reform, published in 1997. This could have allowed the HA to have the necessary resources to improve its services greatly. Then Hong Kong people could have timelier and better services. Unfortunately, this simple proposal has been ignored by our legislators and by our government for all these years.

The case for raising public healthcare fees

Actually, this simple arrangement combines user fees and tax financing. Moreover, it represents an application of the insurance principle, as well as the concept of "annual deductible". Patients who want protection against the expenses that they may have to pay can buy private insurance, which will involve very reasonable insurance premiums because the maximum exposure for the insurance companies is only the annual deductible.

Many people object to fee raises much like a knee-jerk reaction: Any fee raise is simply presumed bad for the patient. But even with low or non-existent fees, what good is the service if it takes too long to get it or if the service is not available when you need it? Today, many patients have to wait a long time before they can get a specialist clinic appointment or for an MRI.

I, too, would object to fee raises if there is not a cap on annual expenses. With an annual cap in place, what is there to worry about? Patients will pay only when they can afford it and will not have to pay any more once the total expenses become excessive. This is why I call this system "Excessive Burden Insurance".

With the technology available today, in particular with the electronic records that each patient will have, tracking the cumulative eligible expenses each year is no longer difficult. Once the cumulative expenses reach the cap, the patient will be advised that he will not have to pay any more for the rest of the year.

For the poor we may also reduce fees as well as lower the cap. If we do not want to put extra burden on those getting Comprehensive Social Security Assistance, we can give them an extra annual allowance that will cover the maximum healthcare fees that they have to pay.

The present fee structure of our public healthcare system really does not make much sense. People, of course, will not complain when they are asked to pay just a nominal fee for costly services. But if they can afford it, why charge them so little, especially when the healthcare system is getting more and more costly and facing increasing demands by the day? I also will not complain if we can charge patients just a nominal fee and are still able to provide reliable, timely services, and if this can be sustained. Unfortunately, when patients badly need services they may be told that they must wait; and when patients cannot afford to pay for some items which are designated to be chargeable, they sometimes have to go without these items.

As far as I can see, under our political system most if not all legislators will tend to condemn fee increases. Since they need votes in order to be re-elected, they typically will not agree to any fee increases. This is most unfortunate.

Actually, the "Excessive Burden Insurance" concept has been applied with much success in Sweden, Australia and in Taiwan, for example. It takes considerable analytical skill to see what is good for Hong Kong, and it takes political courage to stand up for what works - even when popular opinion goes against it. Let us hope for the best.

(HK Edition 12/20/2016 page1)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 理论片中文字幕 | 欧美日韩国产一区二区三区在线观看 | 亚洲一区二区三区免费观看 | 午夜免费69性视频爽爽爽 | 高清国产精品久久久久 | 日韩欧美日本 | 精品久久成人免费第三区 | 成人免费午夜性视频 | 99久久精品国产一区二区小说 | 国内外成人免费在线视频 | 中文字幕在线精品 | 免费在线亚洲视频 | 白嫩美女直冒白浆 | 日韩欧美中文字幕在线播放 | 国产精品国三级国产aⅴ | 国产在线播放一区二区 | 在线精品一区二区三区 | 美女脱了内裤张开腿让男人桶网站 | 久久精品中文字幕有码日本 | 欧美成人私人视频88在线观看 | 亚洲午夜精品一级在线播放放 | 亚洲欧美成人在线 | 日本精高清区一 | 免费a网址 | videos欧美丰满肥婆 | 国产午夜精品一区二区 | 美国一级毛片片aa久久综合 | 中国内地毛片免费高清 | 最新国产三级 | xxxxx亚洲| 99久久精品国产片久人 | 一男一女的一级毛片 | a级成人毛片久久 | 中文字幕有码在线 | 欧美一级毛片无遮挡 | 成人亚洲综合 | 91视频久久久久 | 亚洲欧美日本在线 | 日本在线视频不卡 | 亚洲第五色综合网啪啪 | 特黄日韩免费一区二区三区 |