www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

Dissidents jump to redefine rule of law

Updated: 2017-08-23 07:15

By Lau Nai-keung(HK Edition)

  Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

Lau Nai-keung points out that right to protest does not mean a license to ride roughshod over everyone else

The Oxford English Dictionary defines "rule of law" this way: "The authority and influence of law in society, esp when viewed as a constraint on individual and institutional behavior; (hence) the principle whereby all members of a society (including those in government) are considered equally subject to publicly disclosed legal codes and processes."

Rule of law implies every citizen is subject to the law. It stands in contrast to the idea that the ruler is above the law, for example by divine right.

The rule of law begins with the right of individuals to seek protection through the courts in which justice is administered by unbiased judges. It protects the freedom of individuals to manage their affairs without fear of arbitrary interference by the government or improper influence from the rich and powerful.

Dissidents jump to redefine rule of law

The rule of law governs the way in which power is exercised in Hong Kong. Its principal meaning is that the power of the government and all government officials should be derived from law as expressed in legislation and judicial decisions made by independent courts. No one, including the chief executive, can commit an act that would otherwise constitute a legal wrong or affect a person's liberty unless that person can point to a legal justification for that action.

However, this is not how the dissidents and their friends understand the concept. For them, rule of law means courts deliver judgments to their liking.

Take for example the recent Court of Appeal ruling on sentences for Joshua Wong Chi-fung, Nathan Law Kwun-chung and Alex Chow Yong-kang to prison over their involvement in the 2014 "Occupy Central" protests. For our dissidents, the city's rule of law is preserved if the trio does not need to go to jail; if the Court of Appeal decided the lower court was indeed too lenient in sentencing, rule of law is dead.

We are not sure how to understand this claim.

Last July, the trio was convicted on unlawful assembly charges. Wong was sentenced to 80 hours' community service, Law received 120 hours, while Chow received a three-week suspended jail sentence. How was our rule of law doing back then? Was it safe and sound because the jail sentence for Chow was merely a suspended one? And community service is like extracurricular activity, which if the court does not order Wong and Law the schools would have.

However, according to eminent international figures our rule of law died a sudden death after the suspended jail sentence turns into an unsuspended one. How flimsy our rule of law must be.

"The decision by the courts in Hong Kong to sentence three courageous, principled young men to jail yesterday is an outrageous miscarriage of justice, a death knell for Hong Kong's rule of law and basic human rights, and a severe blow to the principles of 'one country, two systems' on which Hong Kong was returned to China 20 years ago," a statement signed by 25 such public figures read.

This accusation is groundless and is adequately rebutted by the well-written judgment itself.

Acknowledging that according to the Basic Law and the Bill of Rights Ordinance, Hong Kong residents enjoy freedom of assembly, speech, march, demonstration and other methods of expression, judge Wally Yeung wrote in the judgment that "these freedoms are not absolute or without restrictions, and have to be in accordance with the law (If one) uses the guise of exercising freedom of assembly, but is in actual fact destroying public order and peace, (this) will plunge society into chaos, and will have a negative impact on societal progress and development, as well as prevent others from exercising their rights and freedoms. If these situations are not prevented, any talk of freedom and rule of law is empty."

Judge Jeremy Poon's logic was also overwhelming when he reminded us: "These offenders cannot say that the law is taking away or oppressing their freedom of speech and assembly, because the law never allowed them to use illegal methods to exercise these freedoms in the first place."

The New York Times and other foreign fake news forces can make martyrs out of these three young men all they like, but our rule of law remains as robust as it ever has been.

(HK Edition 08/23/2017 page7)

主站蜘蛛池模板: 日本三级韩国三级在线观看a级 | 国产91精品一区二区视色 | 欧美国产精品一区二区免费 | 亚洲国产精品不卡毛片a在线 | 有码一区 | 国产精品一级片 | 日本在线 | 中文 | 久久黄色毛片 | 久久成人亚洲 | 狠狠色狠狠色综合久久一 | 欧美一级www毛片 | 波多野结衣在线免费视频 | 国产手机国产手机在线 | 亚洲综合自拍 | 国产成人精视频在线观看免费 | 91久久另类重口变态 | 亚洲视频欧美视频 | 午夜三级a三级三点在线观看 | 国产一级片观看 | 亚洲女视频 | 日韩一区国产二区欧美三 | 免费一级毛片在线播放不收费 | 美女视频全部免费 | 久草国产视频 | 在线观看亚洲国产 | 欧美日韩亚洲高清不卡一区二区三区 | 日本韩国一级毛片中文字幕 | 成年人免费网站视频 | 国产成人欧美视频在线 | 美女很黄很黄是免费的·无遮挡网站 | 亚洲欧美另类视频 | 国产三级做爰高清在线 | 99久久香蕉国产线看观香 | 99国产精品视频久久久久 | 免费男女乱淫真视频播放 | 久久精品中文字幕一区 | 毛片观看网站 | 国产在线精品一区免费香蕉 | www日本免费 | 国产精品日韩欧美在线第3页 | 在线精品免费观看综合 |