www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / View

Antitrust move is fair, not targeted at foreign firms

By Xin Zhiming | China Daily Europe | Updated: 2014-08-17 13:58

 

It's wrong to blame China for conducting same investigations done in the west

When Rio Tinto employees were arrested for the theft of trade secrets and espionage in 2009, they accused China of using them as a bargaining chip in iron ore price negotiations.

When GlaxoSmithKline was investigated for bribing government and hospital staff to increase drug sales in 2013, they accused China of attempting to squeeze foreign companies out of its vast consumer market.

When Microsoft and other foreign companies were probed for alleged market monopoly, they accused China of discriminating against foreign enterprises.

Western media commentators seem ready to accuse China of foul play whenever foreign enterprises are investigated.

Their unspoken stance is, no matter what they may have done in China, Western companies should be exempt from investigation and punishment; if not, it would be an unequivocal sign of China's bullying of foreign players.

To have a better understanding of such a psychology of self-importance, let's look at what has happened on Western soil.

In 2012, GSK reached a settlement with the United States Department of Justice and agreed to pay $3 billion for promoting its drugs for unapproved uses, irregular promotion and paying kickbacks as well as price manipulation in healthcare programs.

Few have accused the US federal government of abusing its regulatory power.

Microsoft is also a frequent target of Western antitrust investigation thanks to its long-dominant market position. It has been probed by both US and European regulators for its monopolistic activities and paid large sums to settle cases.

Few have accused the US of discriminating against the Internet giant or the European countries of weakening Microsoft's position and protecting local enterprises.

When it comes to China, the fault is put on Chinese regulators.

Admittedly, foreign investors have played an important role in China's economic take-off and growing maturity in the past three decades. They have created jobs, added to local revenues and expanded China's economic output. However, given their large numbers, it is not surprising that some of them have been involved in misconduct, such as monopoly and bribery - just as they have done in overseas markets.

If China does not conduct proper investigations into alleged illegal activities by black sheep, it would be unfair for law-abiding firms - both Chinese and foreign - in China.

The core issue, therefore, is whether the companies investigated have done anything wrong. It is appropriate and legitimate for China to scrutinize if there are signs of foul play in the Chinese market.

Over-interpretation of China's regulatory moves to maintain market order would be both unfounded and misleading.

Those who accuse China of discriminating against foreign companies should look at previous anti-trust cases involving major Chinese companies, including China Telecom and liquor makers Wuliangye Yibin Group and Kweichow Moutai. The latter two were fined as much as 449 million yuan ($72 million) in total for price-fixing.

It seems the number of Chinese companies investigated in anti-trust moves is smaller than that of foreign companies. But regulation should only be based on facts, not mathematics. It would be ridiculous to claim that China is favoring domestic players simply by comparing the number of companies under investigation.

Far more foreign companies are in a leading position in various domestic industries, such as auto-making, milk powder production, computer software and hardware, edible oil, cosmetics and high-end pharmaceuticals, to name but a few. It would not be surprising if some have taken advantage of their positions for illegal benefits.

The victim mentality reflected in the willful accusations against China's normal regulatory moves could have resulted from the changing business landscape in China in recent years.

In the 30 years following China's launch of the reform and opening-up drive in the late 1970s, foreign companies have been widely welcomed as their investment can bring much-needed capital to cash-thirsty local governments. As a result, "introduction of foreign capital" has become a crucial factor in evaluation of the career performance of local officials, and local governments competed fiercely with each other in releasing preferential policies such as free or low-cost use of land and tax exemption to woo foreign investors.

Only in recent years have authorities realized that such investor-wooing policies are not sustainable and have put domestic enterprises at a disadvantage.

In a landmark move, China unified its corporate income tax rate for foreign and domestic companies at 25 percent in 2007. Previously, the rate for both types was 33 percent, but in reality, local governments offered various preferential tax treatments to foreign companies, giving them an edge when they compete with Chinese rivals.

The move is a crucial step for China to build an equality-based market for all, but by depriving foreign enterprises of their privileged treatment, it has inevitably aroused protests from those spoiled foreign players.

In the same vein, the current anti-trust moves, which also are an indispensable step for China to build a real, mature market economy, have made the scrutinized foreign companies uneasy.

Instead of complaining, they should rethink the way they operate in the maturing Chinese market.

The author is a senior writer with China Daily. Contact the writer at xinzhiming@chinadaily.com.cn

 

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 一级做a爱过程免费视 | 亚洲精品在线免费观看视频 | 男女一级| 韩国自拍偷自拍亚洲精品 | 91精品日本久久久久久牛牛 | 一级做a爱片特黄在线观看免费看 | 久草在线网址 | 亚洲成在人线免费视频 | 国产一区免费观看 | 女高中生被cao到哭视频 | 亚洲精品三区 | 国产黄色一级毛片 | 国产欧美曰韩一区二区三区 | 日韩男人天堂 | 亚洲夜色夜色综合网站 | 老头做爰xxxx视频 | 久久久久久久久免费影院 | 欧美成人精品欧美一级乱黄 | 国产黄色免费网站 | 欧美另类综合 | 国产三级三级三级三级 | 暖暖免费高清日本一区二区三区 | 国产成人免费视频精品一区二区 | 最新步兵社区在线观看 | 国产精品成人一区二区三区 | 99re66热这里只有精品免费观看 | 伊人午夜| 久久高清免费 | 久久精品国产99久久久 | 日韩精品在线免费观看 | 欧美一级www| 国内精品久久久久影院不卡 | 亚洲一区二区三区福利在线 | 日韩在线视频线视频免费网站 | 免费看黄色的网址 | 国内精品久久久久影院网站 | 欧美三级在线观看视频 | 步兵精品手机在线观看 | 日本视频在线观看不卡高清免费 | 失禁h啪肉尿出来高h健身房 | 欧美黑粗特黄午夜大片 |