www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / View

Overseas people wait for clarity over Brexit

By Harvey Morris | China Daily Europe | Updated: 2016-10-16 14:05

Foreign investors can be forgiven for worrying that, post-Brexit, Britain's attitude to outside investment might change

Major foreign investors are awaiting some clarity about whether Britain will maintain its traditional open-door policy to international corporations wishing to buy into the its economy following this year's Brexit vote.

Since Theresa May became prime minister in the wake of the June referendum decision to leave the European Union, her insistence that "Brexit means Brexit" has proved an unhelpful guide to both domestic and foreign-owned businesses planning for a future outside the EU.

Hints of a tighter regime came as soon as May came to office in July and put a brake on a nuclear deal involving major Chinese investment. In the end, she gave the go-ahead for the $21.9 billion Hinkley Point nuclear power station development in which China National Nuclear Corporation is a main investor.

May's caution was put down to her wanting assurances about the potential national security implications of placing such a vital infrastructure project in the hands of foreign companies, in this case China and France.

But she has since signaled that the government might adopt a more interventionist stance on foreign investment in less contentious sectors. The emergence of a more protectionist rhetoric from the prime minister has alarmed not only traditional business backers but also free-marketers in her own government.

May's challenge is how to interpret the sentiment of the majority of voters who opted for Brexit in the June 23 referendum, which offered a simple "yes" or "no" choice on continued membership of the EU.

The referendum result has been variously seen as primarily a rejection of large-scale immigration from Europe and elsewhere; as opposition to globalization, including the takeover of British industry by foreign firms; as a reassertion of sovereignty in the face of further political integration within the EU. Or all of the above.

For some voters, the Brexit campaign slogan of "Take back control" might well have been taken as a pledge to take back control of those parts of the economy now in the hands of foreign companies. But that conflicts with the slogan of free market Brexiters that Britain would remain "Open for business" after EU withdrawal.

Controversial foreign takeovers do occasionally make the headlines, as when the quintessentially British chocolate-maker Cadbury's was sold to a US company in 2010. The outcry over the sale was as much a sentimental protest as an expression of concern at the loss of British jobs.

May might have judged that she was tapping into a popular resistance to foreign takeovers when she indicated she might change the law to allow the government to intervene more forcefully to assess their merits. That would involve establishing a system for the government to routinely vet big foreign deals.

However, she faced immediate pushback, not only from the business sector but also within her own cabinet. Philip Hammond, the chancellor (finance minister) reportedly told her in cabinet that Britain could not go down what he called "the Danone route". He was referring to action by the French government in 2005 to block a foreign takeover of food producer Danone, regarded in France as something of a national treasure, just as Cadbury's was in Britain.

Successive free-wheeling British governments have until now tended to ridicule the interventionist tendencies of some of the UK's European neighbors. But foreign investors can be forgiven for worrying that, post-Brexit, Britain's attitude to outside investment might be about to change.

May's nudge toward protectionism might prove popular among voters in the short term, but in the light of the challenges confronting the UK economy after the referendum and of resistance from her free market colleagues, Britain is unlikely to turn its back on foreign investors just yet.

The author is a veteran foreign affairs commentator. Contact the author on harvey.morris@gmail.com. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 成人免费精品视频 | 新26uuu在线亚洲欧美 | 久久精品一区二区影院 | 国内精品久久影视 | 一级毛片在线观看视频 | 国产在线观看免费 | 欧美日韩一区二区三区免费不卡 | 亚洲爽| 九色国产在线 | 亚洲视频精品在线观看 | 免费看一片 | 久久国产精品免费一区二区三区 | 日本免费观看的视频在线 | 国内欧美一区二区三区 | 99久久www免费| 男女交性拍拍拍高清视频 | 美女午夜色视频在线观看 | 精品三级视频 | 韩国一级特黄毛片大 | 亚洲精品久久久久久久福利 | 精品无码三级在线观看视频 | 一区二三区国产 | 亚洲综合色一区二区三区小说 | 中国一级淫片aaa毛片毛片 | 免费手机黄色网址 | 成年网在线观看免费观看网址 | 怡红院在线观看在线视频 | 精品高清国产a毛片 | 日日干夜夜爽 | 精品综合久久久久久88小说 | 一级做a爱片久久蜜桃 | 黄 色 成 年 人小说 | 男人和女人的做刺激性视频 | 性做久久久久久免费观看 | 香港三澳门三日本三级 | 久久精品国产一区二区三区不卡 | 亚洲免费视频网站 | 久久久久欧美精品网站 | 日韩成人免费一级毛片 | 国产日产欧产精品精品推荐小说 | 欧美一区2区 |