久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / View

Overseas people wait for clarity over Brexit

By Harvey Morris | China Daily Europe | Updated: 2016-10-16 14:05

Foreign investors can be forgiven for worrying that, post-Brexit, Britain's attitude to outside investment might change

Major foreign investors are awaiting some clarity about whether Britain will maintain its traditional open-door policy to international corporations wishing to buy into the its economy following this year's Brexit vote.

Since Theresa May became prime minister in the wake of the June referendum decision to leave the European Union, her insistence that "Brexit means Brexit" has proved an unhelpful guide to both domestic and foreign-owned businesses planning for a future outside the EU.

Hints of a tighter regime came as soon as May came to office in July and put a brake on a nuclear deal involving major Chinese investment. In the end, she gave the go-ahead for the $21.9 billion Hinkley Point nuclear power station development in which China National Nuclear Corporation is a main investor.

May's caution was put down to her wanting assurances about the potential national security implications of placing such a vital infrastructure project in the hands of foreign companies, in this case China and France.

But she has since signaled that the government might adopt a more interventionist stance on foreign investment in less contentious sectors. The emergence of a more protectionist rhetoric from the prime minister has alarmed not only traditional business backers but also free-marketers in her own government.

May's challenge is how to interpret the sentiment of the majority of voters who opted for Brexit in the June 23 referendum, which offered a simple "yes" or "no" choice on continued membership of the EU.

The referendum result has been variously seen as primarily a rejection of large-scale immigration from Europe and elsewhere; as opposition to globalization, including the takeover of British industry by foreign firms; as a reassertion of sovereignty in the face of further political integration within the EU. Or all of the above.

For some voters, the Brexit campaign slogan of "Take back control" might well have been taken as a pledge to take back control of those parts of the economy now in the hands of foreign companies. But that conflicts with the slogan of free market Brexiters that Britain would remain "Open for business" after EU withdrawal.

Controversial foreign takeovers do occasionally make the headlines, as when the quintessentially British chocolate-maker Cadbury's was sold to a US company in 2010. The outcry over the sale was as much a sentimental protest as an expression of concern at the loss of British jobs.

May might have judged that she was tapping into a popular resistance to foreign takeovers when she indicated she might change the law to allow the government to intervene more forcefully to assess their merits. That would involve establishing a system for the government to routinely vet big foreign deals.

However, she faced immediate pushback, not only from the business sector but also within her own cabinet. Philip Hammond, the chancellor (finance minister) reportedly told her in cabinet that Britain could not go down what he called "the Danone route". He was referring to action by the French government in 2005 to block a foreign takeover of food producer Danone, regarded in France as something of a national treasure, just as Cadbury's was in Britain.

Successive free-wheeling British governments have until now tended to ridicule the interventionist tendencies of some of the UK's European neighbors. But foreign investors can be forgiven for worrying that, post-Brexit, Britain's attitude to outside investment might be about to change.

May's nudge toward protectionism might prove popular among voters in the short term, but in the light of the challenges confronting the UK economy after the referendum and of resistance from her free market colleagues, Britain is unlikely to turn its back on foreign investors just yet.

The author is a veteran foreign affairs commentator. Contact the author on harvey.morris@gmail.com. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美牲 | 日韩福利视频精品专区 | 国产精品v一区二区三区 | 免费看孕妇毛片全部播放 | 久久久国产99久久国产一 | 国内在线播放 | 亚州一级毛片在线 | 一级毛片视频免费观看 | 在线播放成人毛片免费视 | 免费久久精品 | 二区久久国产乱子伦免费精品 | 中文精品视频一区二区在线观看 | 香蕉伊人网| 日韩在线观看一区二区三区 | 国产亚洲欧美精品久久久 | 日韩在线一区二区三区免费视频 | 九九视频国产 | 久久国产精品视频一区 | 99pao在线视频成精品 | 日韩久久精品 | 一区二区三区精品视频 | 国产一区二区三区四区在线观看 | 久久综合婷婷 | 日韩三级在线观看 | 亚洲www视频| 国产在线91区精品 | 91伊人国产| 美国的毛片免费的 | 久久精品二三区 | 日本久久一区二区 | 在线亚洲精品中文字幕美乳 | 欧美黑寡妇特a级做爰 | 亚洲字幕 | 欧美日韩偷拍自拍 | 欧美一级欧美三级在线观看 | 日韩大片高清播放器大全 | 日韩经典在线观看 | 国产一区二区在免费观看 | 中国胖女人一级毛片aaaaa | 99免费在线 | 久久成人18|