久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

您現(xiàn)在的位置: Language Tips> Columnist> Zhang Xin  
   
 





 
So much for...
What does this headline – So much for Beckham as a voice for MLS (latimes.com, February 12, 2008) – mean?
[ 2008-05-30 10:53 ]


So much for...

Reader question:

What does this headline – So much for Beckham as a voice for MLS (latimes.com, February 12, 2008) – mean?

My comments:

MLS stands for Major League Soccer, the professional soccer league in America. Beckham (David Beckham, otherwise known as the hubby of Posh, one of those Spice Girls. Posh, of course, is also known as the wife of Beckham, all depending on which one of the couple is a bigger name on the occasion) is the former Manchester United and Real Madrid star who is now playing for the Galaxy, a MLS club in Los Angeles. Beckham's move across the seas is seen by many as a great move to advance Posh's singing career, etc, etc, rather than his own – he's going downhill anyway, not so much in bending a free kick but as a player in general. MLS, though, thought Beckham could give the fledgling American league publicity and profile. Yet, you see we're coming to the point, this headline, "So much for Beckham as a voice for MLS" suggests that it is not the case.

Precisely, that headline means this: Beckham is not a voice for MLS, even though people keep saying he is. He's not!

The key expression here is "so much for". Longman Dictionary says the phrase is "used to say that it was not worth using something because it had little effect, it was useless etc: So much for worrying she'd be lonely – she's having a party tonight!"

"So much for something" is often used at an end of an argument, to make an emphatic point. Generally speaking, the expression conveys a message of disappointment, especially over something that's been talked about and held as true for long. In other words, it's like saying "I've had enough" or "stop talking about it," or "that's the end of it."

At any rate, this is another piece of simple but quintessential English that contributes to effective speech and writing. Learn to use it.

But first, let's see more of it in action via media examples. In fact, I've picked three more headlines involving "so much for". Explanations (in brackets) are mine.

1. So much for Free Speech

(According to the article, free speech is no longer a guarantee. It is guaranteed by the First Amendment, and people keep saying that it is guaranteed by the First Amendment but it is not, not in actuality.)

The presidential campaign has confirmed that, under the guise of "campaign finance reform," Congress and the Supreme Court have repealed large parts of the First Amendment. They have simply discarded what were once considered constitutional rights of free speech and political association. It is not that these rights have vanished. But they are no longer constitutional guarantees. They're governed by limits and qualifications imposed by Congress, the courts, state legislatures, regulatory agencies -- and lawyers' interpretations of all of the above.

We have entered an era of constitutional censorship. Hardly anyone wants to admit this -- the legalized demolition of the First Amendment would seem shocking -- and so hardly anyone does. The evidence, though, abounds. The latest is the controversy over the anti-Kerry ads by Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and parallel anti-Bush ads by Democratic "527" groups such as MoveOn.org. Let's assume (for argument's sake) that everything in these ads is untrue. Still, the United States' political tradition is that voters judge the truthfulness and relevance of campaign arguments. We haven't wanted our political speech filtered.

Now there's another possibility. The government may screen what voters see and hear. The Kerry campaign has asked the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to ban the Swift Boat ads; the Bush campaign similarly wants the FEC to suppress the pro-Democrat 527 groups. We've arrived at this juncture because it's logically impossible both to honor the First Amendment and to regulate campaign finance effectively. We can do one or the other -- but not both. Unfortunately, Congress and the Supreme Court won't admit the choice. The result is the worst of both worlds. We gut the First Amendment and don't effectively regulate campaign finance.

The First Amendment says that Congress "shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or . . . the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government" (that's "political association"). The campaign finance laws, the latest being McCain-Feingold, blatantly violate these prohibitions. The Supreme Court has tried to evade the contradiction. It has allowed limits on federal campaign contributions. It justifies the limits as preventing "corruption" or "the appearance of corruption." But the court has rejected limits on overall campaign spending by candidates, parties or groups. Limiting spending, the court says, would violate free speech. Spending enables candidates to reach voters through TV and other media.

- washingtonpost.com, August 25, 2004.

2. So much for the Olympic spirit

(According to the article, the London bid is about business and politics, not about upholding the Olympic spirit. Not at all.)

Is Baron de Coubertin birling in his grave? The founder of the modern Olympic Games, he was a high-minded man, dedicated to instilling a sense of nobility of purpose into young people. The baron saw athletic competition as a means of encouraging participants to become the best they could be – not by winning at any cost, but from taking part.

What a pity de Coubertin's honesty and sportsmanship didn't infuse the team of politicians, former gold medallists, and marketing professionals who put together London's Olympics bid. The father of the modern Olympics was ambitious and honest in hi s intentions. The London bid was fraudulent.

Ever since the first PR foray into the Scottish Parliament was led by Lord Seb Coe, some of us, whilst wishing Seb's group no harm, have been deeply troubled by the effects of the London Olympics on Scotland, not all of which are directly related to sport. For example, MSPs were promised that Scottish companies would benefit from the wide range of contracts, service and manufacturing, that would be up for grabs.

- scotsman.com, May 21, 2008.

3. So much for no child left behind

School test scores rise as more low-scoring students drop out.

(According to the article, low-scoring students keep being forced out, this time by low scores. So they should stop talking about no child left behind.)

I thought of Eddie when I was talking with Rice professor Linda McSpadden McNeil, who has co-authored a study showing that the increase in Texas's statewide test scores directly correlates to lower graduation rates.

In fact, it contributes to them, she believes.

Scores have been rising, not because all these students have suddenly mastered the TAKS, but because low-scoring students have been forced out by administrators whose own job success depends on good student scores.

After all, who wants to carry an Eddie on his record?

- houstonpress.com, April 10, 2008.

我要看更多專欄文章

 

About the author:
 

Zhang Xin is Trainer at chinadaily.com.cn. He has been with China Daily since 1988, when he graduated from Beijing Foreign Studies University. Write him at: zhangxin@chinadaily.com.cn, or raise a question for potential use in a future column.

 
英語點(diǎn)津版權(quán)說明:凡注明來源為“英語點(diǎn)津:XXX(署名)”的原創(chuàng)作品,除與中國日?qǐng)?bào)網(wǎng)簽署英語點(diǎn)津內(nèi)容授權(quán)協(xié)議的網(wǎng)站外,其他任何網(wǎng)站或單位未經(jīng)允許不得非法盜鏈、轉(zhuǎn)載和使用,違者必究。如需使用,請(qǐng)與010-84883631聯(lián)系;凡本網(wǎng)注明“來源:XXX(非英語點(diǎn)津)”的作品,均轉(zhuǎn)載自其它媒體,目的在于傳播更多信息,其他媒體如需轉(zhuǎn)載,請(qǐng)與稿件來源方聯(lián)系,如產(chǎn)生任何問題與本網(wǎng)無關(guān);本網(wǎng)所發(fā)布的歌曲、電影片段,版權(quán)歸原作者所有,僅供學(xué)習(xí)與研究,如果侵權(quán),請(qǐng)?zhí)峁┌鏅?quán)證明,以便盡快刪除。
相關(guān)文章 Related Story
 
 
 
本頻道最新推薦
 
Walking in the US first lady's shoes
“準(zhǔn)確無誤”如何表達(dá)
英國新晉超女蘇珊大媽改頭換面
豬流感 swine flu
你有l(wèi)ottery mentality嗎
翻吧推薦
 
論壇熱貼
 
別亂扔垃圾。怎么譯這個(gè)亂字呀?
橘子,橙子用英文怎么區(qū)分?
看Gossip Girl學(xué)英語
端午節(jié)怎么翻譯?
母親,您在天堂還好嗎?

 

主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲成a人片在线观看中文!!! | 能直接看的一级欧美毛片 | 亚洲一区二区三区四区在线观看 | 一级做a爱过程免费视频时看 | 日本又黄又爽又免费 | 国产在线一区在线视频 | 99在线看| 成人影院欧美大片免费看 | 久久国产乱子伦精品免费不卡 | 日韩一级片免费 | 欧美一级毛片欧美一级成人毛片 | 亚洲欧美日韩三级 | 国产精品秒播无毒不卡 | 黄色亚洲网站 | 成人免费小视频 | 九九九九九九精品免费 | 国产在线观看成人 | 欧美视频第一页 | 成年视频国产免费观看 | 国产一区在线免费观看 | 在线第一页| 国产丶欧美丶日韩丶不卡影视 | 亚洲国产精品专区 | 国产女厕偷窥系列在线视频 | 免费国产成人午夜在线观看 | 曰本三级| 在线私拍国产福利精品 | 免费逼片 | 京东一热本色道久久爱 | 岬奈一区二区中文字幕 | 久久亚洲成a人片 | 一级毛片在线免费看 | 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看 | 久久亚洲精品无码观看不卡 | 亚洲欧美大片 | 国产99视频免费精品是看6 | 久香草视频在线观看 | 最新欧美精品一区二区三区 | 99久久精品一区二区三区 | 欧美一级片观看 | 国产精品国产高清国产专区 |