www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

   
 
“Good” and “Bad” of law
By Tommy Zhang(China IP)
Updated: 2012-10-30

One thousand people may have one thousand understandings of the same law. Some may call it a “good” law while others regard it as a “bad” one. The current Opinion Solicitation Version Draft Amendment to the Copyright Law (Draft) has made many modifications to the original law which are intended to promote economic development and cultural transmission. For example, it adds the droit de suite to fine art, and further clarifies the rights of performers and publishers. The changes to the Draft are regarded as adaptions to historical development and social progress. However, its chapters and articles in collective management and right limitation arouse many controversies and questions, which may even make it a “bad” law.

How should we evaluate the pros and cons of a law? Generally speaking, there are four standards: 1) its legal form; 2) the essence of the legislation; 3) the generation mechanism; and 4) the protection mechanism. A review of the second standard shows that the essence of legislation is to protect personal and property security, maintain equality, guarantee freedom and promote efficiency. The third and fourth standards reveal that China has a relatively complete legislative system and comprehensive generation and protection mechanisms. With these three standards satisfied, logically, the only remaining standard for evaluation of a specific law, such as the pros and cons of the Draft, should be based on the first standard, the legal form.

The form of a good law should have the following four characteristics. The first is universality, which means the legislation is not made for specific persons and groups. The second is clarity, which means that the law must clarify its legal rules and conditions, rights and obligations as well as breach and accountability, and state them in language or text with clear and fixed meaning. The third is integrity, which means the rules of a country’s law should be unified and consistent and should not conflict with each other. The last one is feasibility or practicality, which means that the requirements by legal rules or system must be achievable for citizens or organizations.

The above-mentioned four characteristics are the basic principles that must be reflected in the forms of the laws in a society. Consequently the Draft should also have these four characteristics. From the point of view of ordinary people, it is reasonable to assume that different feelings and conclusions will inevitably arise in evaluating each of these four characteristics. For professional legislators however, such differences are not reasonable. The slightest doubt should not exist, because the new amendment must be in line with all these four points.

The amendment to the Copyright Law touches the nerves of the general public. Moreover, the magnitude of the amendments is a big event. It will greatly impact China’s economic development and its cultural transmission and development; related authorities must think twice before doing anything rash.



The J-Innovation

Steve Jobs died the month that the latest Nobel Prize winners were announced. The coincidence lends itself to speculation about inevitability.

Volunteer team bails out busy court

Government supports unique intellectual property fund

IP service providers showcase products

Experts call for standardization of IP services

主站蜘蛛池模板: 免费一级毛片在线播放视频 | 在线观看免费黄色网址 | 中国一级毛片特级毛片 | 国产精品国产三级在线高清观看 | 国产亚洲精品国看不卡 | 狠狠综合久久久久综合小说网 | 日韩一区二区三区精品 | 欧美日韩亚洲一区二区三区在线观看 | 成年网站视频在线观看 | 一级做a爱片久久蜜桃 | 日韩色在线 | 久久国产精品岛国搬运工 | 996re免费热在线视频手机 | 女同日韩互慰互摸在线观看 | 免费a级毛片网站 | 色久网| 国产精品亚洲一区二区三区久久 | 99国产福利视频区 | 91小视频在线观看免费版高清 | 久久免费影院 | 欧美黑人巨大最猛性xxxxx | 久草免费看 | 波多野结衣中文无毒不卡 | 日韩精品麻豆 | 日本高清在线不卡 | 国产va免费精品高清在线观看 | www.亚洲在线| 色久天堂网 | 六月丁香婷婷色狠狠久久 | 一级片视频免费看 | 一本色道久久综合亚洲精品 | 末满18以下勿进色禁网站 | 成人性视频在线 | 国产一区二区三区在线观看视频 | 三级毛片网站 | 欧美高清一级片 | 美女超爽久久久久网站 | 欧美一级淫片免费观看 | 91视频99 | 国产精品久久久 | 亚洲男人的天堂成人 |