www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
China / Top Stories

Illegally obtained evidence defined

By Zhang Yi (China Daily) Updated: 2017-06-28 07:30

The Supreme People's Court has announced a new regulation taking effect on the exclusion of illegally obtained evidence in criminal cases, banning confessions made under torture or duress.

The regulation, which took effect on Tuesday, specifies the conditions under which evidence must be excluded in court trials to prevent wrongful convictions and safeguard human rights.

Under the regulation, it is illegal for police or prosecutors to extort confessions through torture, threat or subterfuge. Forced self-incrimination is also prohibited.

Confessions, witness testimonies and victim depositions obtained by force may no longer be accepted as evidence.

Jointly issued by the Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People' s Procuratorate, the Ministry of Public Security and other departments, the regulation is regarded as major progress in the criminal procedure system in China.

Dai Changlin, a member of the adjudication committee of the Supreme People' s Court, said evidence is crucially important to the administration of justice.

"In recent years, mistakes were made in adopting evidence in court trials that led to wrongful conviction and execution of defendants. The mistakes were the result of accepting self-incrimination under torture or duress," he added.

Compared with previous versions issued in 2010 and 2012, the new regulation specifies the standards of illegally obtained evidence and makes clear the procedures for excluding such evidence, and this is expected to ensure that the evidence is collected, examined and employed in accordance with laws, Dai said.

In addition, criminal suspects and their lawyers are allowed to apply for illegal evidence to be ruled out during the investigation, the regulation said.

Prosecutors are required to ask suspects in major cases and examine whether they have been forced to confessor confronted illegal evidence collection before the conclusion of investigation, the document said.

Chen Ruihua, a law professor at Peking University, said, compared with previous versions, the regulation grants the prosecutors more power to exclude illegally obtained evidence.

The regulation requires prosecuting departments to accept the application from defendants and their lawyers to exclude illegally obtained evidence and requires that prosecutors not use the evidence when they issue arrest warrants, Chen said.

Xinhua contributed to this story.

zhang_yi@chinadaily.com.cn

Highlights
Hot Topics

...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 日本久久香蕉一本一道 | 亚洲欧美另类专区 | 一本高清 | 国产一级小视频 | 熟女毛片 | 国产特黄特色一级特色大片 | 欧美jizzhd精品欧美高清 | 欧美13一14sexvideo欧 | 一本伊大人香蕉高清在线观看 | 亚洲乱人伦精品图片 | 国产精品v欧美精品v日本精 | 国产性自爱拍偷在在线播放 | 精品日韩在线视频一区二区三区 | 美女mm131爽爽爽免费视色 | 久久国产视频一区 | 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看 | 国产三级久久 | 精品国产成人综合久久小说 | 91福利国产在线观一区二区 | 99视频在线精品免费 | 天码毛片一区二区三区入口 | 国产一区二区成人 | 国产高清在线精品一区二区 | 日本高清免费视频www | 久久怡红院亚欧成人影院 | 欧美色视频日本片免费高清 | 国产一国产一级毛片视频在线 | 国产精品特黄一级国产大片 | 免费视频18 | 午夜精品视频 | 免费看欧美一级特黄a大片一 | 成人网在线视频 | 亚洲人成亚洲精品 | 国内精品久久久久影院不卡 | 性色午夜视频免费男人的天堂 | 国产精品一区二区久久精品 | 久久亚洲国产精品 | 在线欧美视频 | 午夜天堂视频 | 欧美一级毛片欧美一级成人毛片 | 国内精品久久精品 |