www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

OPINION> Brendan John Worrell
Leadership spelt with a 't'
By Brendan John Worrell (chinadaily.com.cn)
Updated: 2008-06-16 19:45

Some both home and abroad misunderstood the recent display of unity among Chinese, insinuating that China's leadership was exploiting the recent Sichuan quake, where almost 70,000 died and millions were made homeless.

The Economist last week wrote of populism and condescendingly pointed the finger at Premier Wen in an editorial titled, "Why Grandpa Wen has to care".

To be fair, it wasn't the Chinese media's construction of, "The cult of 'Grandpa' Wen," as the June 13 editorial put it. Rather it was coverage of a major disaster area, where a leader in his 60s, rushed to the scene, directed relief efforts around the clock and eased the suffering of many.

Wen made himself accountable and transparent. Traits westerners love to point their finger at when criticizing China. At times like this people need to be brought together. He helped do this.

Concerning leadership, readers of The Economist may benefit from a critique of their own PM and Gordon Brown's recent poor reception over the last 10 months. Or they may seek clarification on the more recent implosion of the opposition conservative Tory party.

Likewise when PM Brown canoodled with the Dalai Lama just weeks after doing business with Beijing – his integrity was open to question - though little reportage was granted here.

Leadership without the p and replaced with a t, spells and smells what British citizenry may be thinking of their men in charge - ever since Blair was hoodwinked into invading Iraq.

It may also be what media savvy consumers realize has been going on regarding recent reportage on the middle kingdom.

On May 15th, 3 days after the earthquake, The Economist ran a rather stinging piece "Flying the Flag", regarding China's quest to build regional air carriers which it called, "a recipe for wasting money", prophesizing Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China's chance at success as "dauntingly low".

A response from one of their readers recognized the irony, as the UK was also no stranger to state assistance when it came to their aviation industry and British Airways. The French governments nurturing of Airbus, and the US' promotion of Boeing as a national asset also warranted comparison, though absent in The Economist's article.

To be fair, the UK has an excellent tradition of robust journalism particularly in the realm of finance and politics. Globally, as in China, people look to the Times, the Guardian, the Financial Times and the BBC for balance - though they may be a little disappointed recently.

Rather than reacting to last week's Economist editorial or the other more woeful comments across the Atlantic by CNN's Jack Cafferty and his lax remarks about China's leadership, it is best to appreciate the context in which such comments are generated.

Such a landscape promotes criticism and demands that you 'take it on the chin'. The western tradition requires you present your side of the debate and 'give as good as you get'. This is considered fair game.

Now changes are afoot evidenced recently when Sharon Stone exposed her profound philosophy regarding karma and the death of innocents from the earthquake. The uproar generated among China's citizenry was eloquent and equal to the task.

China has been taking it on the chin for over a century and no longer has a glass jaw. Her people are starting to stand up and as we see today economically they are wielding some collective might. Culturally the people have been learning the English language for decades and are becoming more articulate and confident to present their side of reality. This needs to be appreciated. Traditionally it was less encouraged here to criticize authority or be too outward in expressions of emotion. But times are changing.

Call it populism, call it media manipulation, call it collective exasperation call it what you will. Joint grieving as seen last month in China may actually represent group therapy and from a social psychologists' perspective it isn't necessarily bad.

Perhaps more importantly the constant domestic media coverage served a greater purpose towards rallying the country and generating donations to those in need – perhaps something the Economist could have considered assisting appreciating their readerships' fiscal muscle.

Moreover, The Cult of Grandpa Wen, as perceived by some, lacks appreciation of this man's success as a leader over almost 3 decades of public service.

The majority of Chinese today seek stability and improvement in life outcomes and they have, in part, the present leadership to thank for this situation.

E-mail: brendanjohnworrell@hotmail.com

 

 

主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久精品2020| 欧美日韩一区二区三区在线视频 | 午夜精 | 免费观看呢日本天堂视频 | 成人av手机在线观看 | 在线精品日韩一区二区三区 | 久久久日韩精品国产成人 | 国产美女又黄又爽又色视频免费 | 欧美大狠狠大臿蕉香蕉大视频 | 亚洲男女在线 | aaaa毛片 | 俄罗斯极品美女毛片免费播放 | 久久午夜精品视频 | 中文字幕亚洲一区 | 综合精品在线 | 男人桶女人逼 | 国产丶欧美丶日韩丶不卡影视 | 成人a毛片视频免费看 | 97精品国产91久久久久久 | 最近免费手机中文字幕3 | 色樱桃影院亚洲精品影院 | 日韩在线免费视频 | 91探花福利精品国产自产在线 | 国产精品久久久久免费 | 日本不卡高清免费 | 国产盗摄精品一区二区三区 | 久久久久88色偷偷免费 | 国产精品亚洲综合天堂夜夜 | 亚洲视频毛片 | 国产盗摄精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲区免费| 精品国产成人高清在线 | 最新69成人精品毛片 | 国产大陆亚洲精品国产 | 欧美黄色一级在线 | wwwwwww黄| 日韩欧美国产精品 | 美女视频永久黄网站免费观看国产 | 九草在线播放 | 久久久久久久综合 | 国产成人精品aaaa视频一区 |