www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

OP Rana

Trivialize climate data at our own peril

By Op Rana (China Daily)
Updated: 2010-04-09 07:37
Large Medium Small

The jury is still out on Rajendra K. Pachauri. The embattled head of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been cleared of charges that the agency received funds from private companies. But Pachauri has to wait until autumn sheds the toxic leaves that are threatening to poison his IPCC tree.

Pachauri has faced attacks, many of them blatantly racist, from every possible corner of the globe. But let's be clear, if Pachauri deserved the bouquets for IPCC's good work, he has to accept the brickbats for its failures and lapses, too. There can be no excuse for the IPCC's flawed report saying the Himalayan glaciers could melt by 2035. Nor can the manipulation of climate change data, as suggested by leaked e-mails of University of East Anglia scientists, be defended.

But the question is: Why didn't climate skeptics have the insight and counterdata to question the IPCC's findings on Himalayan glaciers and trivial other facts? The fact is that almost all IPCC data is indisputable.

So at stake here is more than climate change data. Pachauri was chosen to lead the IPCC not because he was an Indian but because former US president George W. Bush rooted for him, thinking he would help the developed world's cause.

The world, however, knows Pachauri didn't do that. Instead, he went on to present a report that made the world sit up to the reality of climate change. He became a household name overnight and shared the Nobel Peace Price with former US vice-president Al Gore for his role in trying to save the planet.

This is something that developed countries couldn't accept. Climate skeptics, who mostly come from developed countries, were waiting for an excuse to throttle the IPCC and Pachauri. And Pachauri offered them that on a platter in the shape of the Himalayan glacier report and the leaked e-mails.

That is what happens when an all-important organization like the IPCC doesn't have a permanent head. The IPCC may not be a supervisory or administrative body. But in more ways than one it has the power to shape the future of our planet - the least it could do is point out the problems and suggest the solutions. Such an important body can't do without a permanent head, which Pachauri is not.

Pachauri heads the New Delhi-based TERI (The Energy and Resources Institute), too, which landed him in a soup. He has been accused of taking favors from private companies. But KPMG, a professional services company that examined the personal finances of Pachauri, has cleared him of any wrongdoing.

Leaders of countries, whose interests were being compromised because of the measures they had to take to counter climate change, as well as big private companies and climate skeptics were waiting for a chance to pounce on Pachauri. Such has been the impact of the IPCC controversy that even green activists are divided over Pachauri. The Friends of the Earth and World Wide Fund for Nature defend Pachauri, but Greenpeace says he should resign to restore the reputation of the IPCC and the UN.

So what do we do now - pretend that climate change is a myth, as some climate skeptics say, or do something to counter the threat?

Perhaps Pachauri gives the best answer to this. Accusing politicians and prominent climate skeptics of "a new form of persecution" against scientists who work on global warming, he has said that scientific knowledge of climate change is "something we distort and trivialize at our peril".

We have been doing exactly that, as James Lovelock, the man behind the Gaia theory, said recently. The scientist who said the planet behaves like a single organism, claimed humans were "not clever enough" to handle climate change problems. "I don't think we're yet evolved to the point where we're clever enough to handle as complex a situation as climate change," he said. "The inertia of humans is so huge that you can't really do anything meaningful."

The controversial scientist warned that only a catastrophic event would persuade humans that the threat of climate change was serious.

The problem is that by the time such a catastrophe strikes it will be too late to act.

E-mail: oprana@hotmail.com

主站蜘蛛池模板: 人与拘一级a毛片 | 免费成年人在线视频 | 综合久久一区二区三区 | 成人一级片在线观看 | 久久精品国产亚洲7777小说 | 日本私人色多多 | 久久青草网站 | 欧美精品一区二区在线观看播放 | 99re热这里只有精品视频 | 亚洲高清国产一区二区三区 | 欧美二区在线观看 | 毛片免费观看视频 | 性生话一级国产片 | 久久久精品久久 | 久久精品一区二区免费看 | 亚洲成人精品 | 亚洲九九视频 | 男人透女人超爽视频免费 | 欧美jizzhd极品欧美 | 日本在线视频免费看 | 成人免费手机在线看网站 | 92国产福利久久青青草原 | 波多野结衣视频在线观看地址免费 | 日产一区二区三区四区 | 国产精品麻豆一区二区三区v视界 | 午夜影院福利社 | 免费在线观看一区 | 欧美一区二区在线视频 | 亚洲制服丝袜美腿亚洲一区 | 免费国产成人18在线观看 | 免费成人 | 久久精品毛片 | 沈樵在线观看福利 | 最新精品国产 | 国产美女一级特黄毛片 | 精品一区二区久久 | 欧美成人 综合网播九公社 欧美成人26uuu欧美毛片 | a毛片免费播放全部完整 | 国产日本欧美在线观看 | 国产一区二区三区在线观看免费 | 国产大臿蕉香蕉大视频女 |