www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / From the Press

Counties may be incorrectly labeled as poverty stricken

chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2013-02-27 20:18

Datong county’s return to the ranks of poverty county after 16 years, shows that related authorities haven’t followed the criteria and standard by which poverty counties should be judged, says an article on China Youth Daily. Excerpts:

In 1996, Datong county in Shanxi province was judged to be a comparatively well-off county. But Datong’s financial income in that year was only 37.4 million yuan ($600 million), while expenditure was as high as 65.9 million yuan. Datong local authority couldn’t make ends meet at that time and didn’t achieve the 16 principles that determine a comparatively well-off county.

It’s was simply the hopes and endeavors of local authorities’ that led to Datong being judged to be a comparatively well-off county.

In January this year, Datong was labeled a national poverty county — again thanks to the efforts of local officials.

It makes the public doubt whether counties labeled as being comparatively well-off or poverty stricken, or the metropolises labeled as clean or livable cities, really deserve their name.

If a county is really poor and needs help it should be regarded as a poverty county once local authorities report the real situation. But according to Wang Hanbin, chief of Datong poverty alleviation and development office, it’s difficult to get the document that will classify Datong as a national poverty county. There are many human factors that influence if a county is poor. A widespread joke goes: A head of a county said his area isn’t regarded as a poverty county because they are too poor.

The label of comparatively well-off or poverty can be unduly influenced by the individuals in the counties who want a certain label because it could benefit them. Liang Shubin, former headmaster of Datong county party school, said it’s difficult for them to get funds or financial aid if they have the label comparatively well-off county.

Datong’s case exposes how authorities do not strictly implement policy determining the areas rankings according to criteria and standards.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 男女午夜性爽快免费视频不卡 | 在线看国产视频 | 最新69成人精品毛片 | 久久精品国产国产精品四凭 | 91日本在线精品高清观看 | 欧美一级成人免费大片 | 日韩欧美国产一区二区三区 | 日韩视频免费一区二区三区 | 日韩视频一区二区 | 久久精品最新免费国产成人 | 日韩不卡一级毛片免费 | 免费一级片网站 | 久久在线免费视频 | 久久一区二区三区免费 | 欧美亚洲国产成人高清在线 | 国产欧美一区视频在线观看 | 国产精品视频成人 | 亚洲免费色 | 国产亚洲精品国产一区 | 欧美一区二区精品 | 亚洲区免费 | 一级片免费在线播放 | 国产高清在线精品免费 | 久草在线资源视频 | 99精品视频在线免费观看 | 色婷婷久久综合中文久久蜜桃 | 亚洲国产精品久久久久秋霞不卡 | 黄色网址免费在线 | 成人a毛片手机免费播放 | 国产大片中文字幕在线观看 | 成人午夜久久 | 国产精品视频成人 | 高清国产露脸捆绑01经典 | 国产97在线视频 | 国产 magnet | 亚洲好视频 | 免费看一区二区三区 | 国产精品免费久久久免费 | 国产91久久精品一区二区 | 播播网手机在线播放 | 日韩美女在线看免费观看 |