www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Editorials

Defend fairness of exams

(China Daily) Updated: 2014-06-09 08:10

Different people have different expectations of the annual national college entrance exams. But for students who sit the exams, high scores are solely what they expect or hope for. The fact that exam results will make a difference to their future, unless there is a reform to subvert its basic model, points to the stupidity of the argument that the current exams are the culprit for the country's lack of first-class scientists and thinkers.

Finger-pointing at the exam model has resulted in high-pitched demand for reform of the model, but it seems that very few know what kind of changes should be made to the current system, in which candidates' exam results solely decide which universities they will enter.

The autonomy some universities have been granted to enroll a certain percentage of students on their own, for the purpose of paving the way for a multiple means of college enrollment, has actually provided opportunities for rent seeking on the part of both the institutions of higher learning and those who can afford to buy their children's way into prestigious universities.

Whether such autonomy should be taken away from the hands of universities remains a question, but what sparks controversy is the practice by 16 provinces and municipalities including Beijing to give extra scores to exam candidates who are appraised as models of ethical behavior and moral integrity.

The problem is who has the power to decide which student is such a model and what are the criteria. If such a practice is just a way for some people with wealth or other resources to lubricate their children's way into prestigious universities, such a practice will become morally corrupt in the name of giving credit to students that are role models.

It is indeed necessary to make changes to the current exam model so that multiple criteria apply in the enrollment of students. Yet, such changes should never open the door to corruption or erode the fairness of the exams.

If there cannot be enough transparency and supervision over a university's autonomy to enroll students on their own or other ways of appraising the qualities of candidates, the national college entrance exam model may have to remain as it is until the conditions become ripe for reform.

That many Chinese graduates have developed well in the Western countries points to the fact that this exam model is not that bad and does help foster a lot of candidates with excellent talents.

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 免费观看毛片的网站 | 国产日韩线路一线路二 | 婷婷尹人香蕉久久天堂 | 91香蕉国产 | 亚洲欧美中文日韩在线v日本 | 美女被强行扒开双腿激情视频 | 亚洲一区二区三区在线网站 | 精品午夜久久网成年网 | 东莞a级毛片 | 欧美99视频 | 99久久精品免费看国产高清 | 亚洲国语| 色九| 亚洲a级在线观看 | 日本一区二区三区四区无限 | 亚洲天堂精品在线观看 | 精品国产v无码大片在线观看 | 国产成人久视频免费 | 亚洲国产精品自在现线让你爽 | 国产一区二区在线免费观看 | 欧美大片一区 | 麻豆69堂免费视频 | 国产成人高清 | aaaaaa毛片免费看 | 欧美人与鲁交大毛片免费 | 网站在线看| 亚洲乱码一二三四五六区 | 91亚洲国产成人久久精品网址 | 成人伊人| 成人9久久国产精品品 | 91香蕉国产 | 一本综合久久 | 久草免费在线观看视频 | 久久精品人人爽人人爽快 | 国产三级在线观看播放 | 99在线热播精品免费 | 欧美一级特黄aaaaaa在线看首页 | 亚洲国产韩国一区二区 | 在线免费观看国产 | 国产乱弄视频在线观看 | 亚州免费视频 |