www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Manila has no locus standi in sea case

By Zhou Jiang (China Daily) Updated: 2014-12-11 07:35

A Foreign Ministry document on the Philippines' move to take the South China Sea dispute to an international tribunal for arbitration reiterates that China will not accept, let alone participate, in such kind of adjudication. The document, issued on Sunday, explains why the tribunal has no jurisdiction over the dispute.

Aside from the greater issues Manila's arbitration request involves, the "mandatory arbitration" it is seeking before fulfilling some prior procedural obligations is also an important reason why the tribunal should not take up the case. According to Article 288 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, whether or not a court or tribunal has jurisdiction over any dispute between parties depends on whether the dispute is submitted in accordance with part XV of the Convention. And Article 286 also says that any dispute on the interpretation or application of the Convention shall, where no settlement has been reached by recourse to section 1, be submitted at the request of any party to the dispute to the court or tribunal having jurisdiction under this section.

A study of the relevant clauses of the document shows Manila has not fulfilled the obligations of "settling the dispute by peaceful means" and "exchanging views with other parties to the dispute" before taking the dispute to the tribunal.

According to Article 279 of the Convention and Clause 33 of the UN Charter, peaceful means to resolve the dispute include talks, investigations, mediation, arbitration, judicial settlement and other peaceful means agreed to by the disputing parties. But despite the inclusion of "arbitration", the Article excludes "mandatory arbitration", which Manila seeks.

Article 279 states only sketchily that parties should settle a dispute on the interpretation and/or application of the Convention through peaceful means in accordance with relevant international documents, and Article 298 and other articles present supplementary statements on matters such as how to choose peaceful means. For example, Articles 280 and 281 encourage relevant parties to resolve their disputes peacefully through the negotiation means they agree to.

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
Considering money as the end is the tragedy
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 免费韩国美女爽快一级毛片 | 一级毛毛片毛片毛片毛片在线看 | 日本三级全黄三级a | 欧美激情一区二区三区高清视频 | 刺激免费视频 | 综合色久七七综合七七蜜芽 | 国产人成精品 | 国产一区二区中文字幕 | 久久草在线视频 | 国产欧美日韩视频在线观看一区二区 | 欧美成人3d动漫专区 | 网禁呦萝资源网站在线观看 | 国产三级黄色片 | 一级特黄性色生活片一区二区 | 亚洲一区在线播放 | 国产玖玖玖精品视频 | 亚洲精品一区二区在线观看 | 亚洲一区日韩一区欧美一区a | 成人免费一级毛片在线播放视频 | 黄录像欧美片在线观看 | 国内精品一区二区在线观看 | 欧美一级毛片高清免费观看 | 高清在线亚洲精品国产二区 | 精品视频在线看 | 页面升级亚洲 | 性欧美巨大 | 欧美性巨大欧美 | 性色a | 久久99国产乱子伦精品免费 | 日本美女高清在线观看免费 | 全免费毛片在线播放 | 窝窝午夜看片七次郎青草视频 | 欧美在线播放成人a | 欧美人成在线视频 | 亚洲第一区香蕉_国产a | 99九九精品视频 | 国产偷国产偷亚洲高清午夜 | 亚洲六月丁香六月婷婷蜜芽 | 欧美日韩成人 | 亚洲欧美视屏 | 高颜值美女啪啪 |