www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

For whom does the road toll greedily?

By Xin Zhiming (China Daily) Updated: 2014-12-25 07:48

Officials have justified the continued fees by claiming that investments for the building and operation of those roads have not yet been recovered, so it is reasonable to continue charging drivers.

While at first glance, the Ministry of Transport data seem to justify their stance, a closer look at the data might show otherwise.

For example, in 2013, the managerial costs exceeded that of road operation, which is difficult to understand, and many netizens have questioned whether the road companies are overstaffed and this is a core reason behind the bloated management costs.

The public questioning is not without cause. In a 2008 audit report released by the National Audit Office, it was found that a toll-collection agency in Central China's Hubei province budgeted to have 30 people in the payroll, but it actually employed 144 people. Likewise, a Shanxi road management agency was supposed to have 27 people on the payroll, but it was paying 156 people.

The auditing report also noted that the pay for these road managers was much higher than market levels in some places. Moreover, it said more irregularities, such as the bloating of debts and illegal exemption of toll charges, had been found, which also pushed up expenditures and reduced revenues.

This time, it is not clear yet whether the deficit has been caused by overstaffing, inflated salaries or other irregularities. So the ministry should disclose more detailed information regarding how many road managers it has hired and how much they have been paid, to respect the public's right to know.

Regarding the "other expenditures", the ministry also needs to clarify what these entail, so that the public can scrutinize whether there are any abnormal expenditures.

And even if the balance sheet provided by the ministry turns out to be all above board, the deficit should not be used to justify the prolonged charging of the expressway toll charges.

When a road starts operation with an explicitly set duration for collecting the fees, then it constitutes a de facto contract between the road management authorities and road users. The prolonging of the charges violates this contract and those doing so should be put under strict public scrutiny.

In reality, car users have little say in the decision-making process. This is against the spirit of rule of law and it is high time the transport authorities address the problem and show respect to the public. If they lean toward the commercial interests involved in road management, then it will risk triggering more public anger.

The author is a senior writer with China Daily. xinzhiming@chinadaily.com.cn

Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美成人性生活视频 | 久久怡红院国产精品 | 欧美满嘴射 | 91精品一区二区三区在线观看 | 成年人毛片视频 | 日韩一级a毛片欧美区 | 国产精品单位女同事在线 | 欧美人成在线观看网站高清 | 天天黄色片| 国产一级毛片在线 | 久久久国产精品免费视频 | 中文字幕欧美亚洲 | 亚洲羞羞视频 | 国产偷怕 | 久草在线免费色站 | 综合久久91| 日韩美一区二区 | 成人免费aaaaa毛片 | 性刺激欧美三级在线现看中文 | 欧美一区二区三区在线播放 | 亚洲一区二区视频 | 一级成人a毛片免费播放 | 日韩欧美一级a毛片欧美一级 | 亚洲精品在线视频 | 亚洲视频99 | 日韩成人免费一级毛片 | 99视频99 | 日韩美女网站在线看 | 精品伊人久久久久7777人 | 中文字幕在线网址 | 久久女同互慰一区二区三区 | 国产成人精品免费视频大 | 自拍第1页 | 国产欧美另类久久久精品免费 | 亚洲国产午夜精品理论片的软件 | 国产成人午夜性视频影院 | 中国国产一级毛片 | 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线观看 | 久草视频在线观 | 日本高清免费视频色www | 精品久久久久久久九九九精品 |