www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / OP Rana

Real problems need real solutions

By OP Rana (China Daily) Updated: 2015-05-14 08:16

Real problems need real solutions

A street vendor waits for customers as she sells chicken outside her makeshift shelter at a slum on the outskirts of Islamabad March 10, 2015. [Photo/Agencies]

Fighting poverty, protecting the environment and reaching healthcare to the poor (if we, for the moment, ignore ending conflicts, armed and unarmed alike) seem to be the overriding priorities of politicians and think tanks across the world. Indeed, they are noble goals.

The problem is the approach which mainstream intellectuals and experts propose to achieve those goals. It turns out that unshackled international trade - for example, a successful Doha free trade agreement - is the top choice of economists and think tanks, some of which masquerade as expert environmental protection groups.

This is hardly surprising because making money, more money than normally possible, is the top priority of mainstream economists. The logic seems to be that money will take care of all the problems. Of course, money can fight poverty and reach healthcare to the poor. But will the money earned from free international trade be used by those who possess it do so? Had that been the case, close to 1 billion people across the world would not be living in abject poverty. And had that been the case, three decades of World Trade Organization-dictated economic rules would have reached healthcare to most of the world's poor by now.

The food produced by the world today is enough to feed the entire global population. But that does not happen. And a global free trade agreement will make that more difficult, because it will make farming a less profitable profession because of the forced lifting of subsidies in developing countries, which, in turn, will lead to falling productions and subsequent shortage of food grains.

One of the main sticking points in a global free trade agreement is subsidy (or the lifting of it). Developing countries say they are being forced to lift agricultural subsidies by the developed economies even though the latter offer much higher amounts in subsidies to their farmers in different forms. Even if we ignore the arm-twisting methods adopted by some advanced economies to compel the developing economies to accept their demand, how can we ignore the state of agriculture in poor countries which have a large number of subsistence farmers? What will happen to these farmers and their families? Suicide, just like the hundreds of thousands of farmers in India committed?

Cutting subsidies on the use of fossil fuels - "to the tune of more than $500 billion each year" - will "reduce pollution and free up resources for investments in health, education and infrastructure", say two leading mainstream economists. The problem is that cutting these subsidies will raise public transport fares which the poor in many developing countries cannot afford to pay. With a larger part of their incomes being consumed by transport fares, these people will be further pushed into rather that being lifted out of poverty, because they have to cut expenses on more important items such as food, medicines and children's education.

And the least said the about taking care of the environment through perpetually rising productions and increasing profits the better. The more we exploit nature (extract oil and coal, and chop down forests, for example) the more damage we cause to the environment. Thus protecting the environment through rising productions defies logic.

The Earth has finite resources. Freshwater is an apt example. Droughts in many places in many countries, from the United States to China and India, are pointing to the dangers of water overuse. Complicating the human problems are unseasonal rains and floods in many countries, from the Americas to Europe and Asia.

The answer to the world's burning problems is not more productions and profits. The time has come to think differently, to study firsthand what the problems of the poor and weak are and then suggest solutions. The problems faced by the world's poor cannot be solved and the sufferings of the environment cannot be addressed on graphs and chessboards. They are real problems and need real solutions.

The author is a senior editor with China Daily.

oprana@hotmail.com

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲欧美日韩视频一区 | www.99精品视频在线播放 | 色狠狠色综合吹潮 | 国产精品免费观在线 | 免费黄色美女视频 | 亚洲欧美另类自拍第一页 | 国产成人久久精品二区三区牛 | 久久国产精品1区2区3区网页 | 狼人 成人 综合 亚洲 | 日本欧美一区二区三区在线 | 色偷偷成人网免费视频男人的天堂 | 欧美亚洲国产精品久久久久 | 久久精品国产400部免费看 | 99免费在线视频 | 国产美女午夜精品福利视频 | 黄色三级网站在线观看 | 精品国产一区二区三区久久 | 国产一级毛片国语版 | 精品国产v无码大片在线观看 | 免费一级a毛片免费观看欧美大片 | 色老头一区二区三区在线观看 | 韩国在线精品福利视频在线观看 | 国产欧美精品午夜在线播放 | 高h原耽肉汁动漫视频 | 在线播放性xxx欧美 在线播放亚洲视频 | 久久91精品国产99久久yfo | 国产蜜汁tv福利在线 | 92精品国产成人观看免费 | 国产三级黄色片 | 91成人午夜性a一级毛片 | 黄色福利小视频 | 亚洲国产成人超福利久久精品 | 国产精品亚洲综合久久 | 免费看黄色的网址 | 日韩免费一级a毛片在线播放一级 | 欧美三级欧美一级 | 亚洲精品不卡视频 | 欧美一区二区三区不卡免费观看 | 伊人狼人综合 | 在线观看精品国产 | 一及毛片 |