www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Opinion Line

Demolition of university building causes dilemma for local officials

(China Daily) Updated: 2016-09-13 07:53

Demolition of university building causes dilemma for local officials

People flock to the cherry blossom garden in Wuhan University on the first day it began selling tickets in Wuhan city, capital of Central China's Hubei province, March 21, 2014. [Photo/icpress.cn]

THE MAIN TEACHING BUILDING OF Wuhan University in Central China's Hubei province was demolished with explosives on Friday. Media reports quoted local officials as saying they demolished the building as it spoiled the scenic surroundings of nearby East Lake. Southern Metropolis Daily commented:

The building, designed by architect He Jingtang, was built in 1997 at the cost of 100 million yuan ($14.9 million) and put into use in 2000. It won several national architecture awards, including the top award for architecture, the Luban Award.

Yet the building was demolished at the cost of 13 million yuan. That's a huge waste of taxpayers' money, because Wuhan University is a public university, funded by the State.

Moreover, the incident is a legal matter. Let's have a look at the nation's Circular Economy Promotion Law, which requires urban governments and the owners of buildings to take measures to maintain them and lengthen their service life. The law also forbids local governments to demolish buildings within their service lives unless it is in the public's interest.

Obviously, demolishing the university building breaks the law. In order to defend themselves, the officials offered the excuse that the building was so high that it exceeded the height limits for buildings around the East Lake. They even said that the building has "ruined the scenery of East Lake".

That's a rather weak excuse and a ridiculous defense. As early as the 1980s, East Lake was listed in the national plan for ecological tourism, and the building was constructed later than that. If the building went against that plan, why did the officials not intervene when they started building it? Why were they silent in 1996 and then have the building demolished 20 years later?

Officials in Wuhan now face a dilemma. If they insist the demolished building had problems, the officials who approved its construction in 1996 should be held answerable. If the building did not break any planning restrictions and there was no justification for the demolition, those who decided to demolish it should pay for their deeds. Something illegal has happened and taxpayers' money has been wasted, and we hope to make clear who is responsible.

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 看一级毛片| 日本污污网站 | 高清国产一级精品毛片基地 | 三级精品 | 红色记忆 | 久久精品大片 | 日本精品夜色视频一区二区 | 日韩三级在线免费观看 | 国产高清在线精品免费 | 国产欧美久久久精品 | 欧美极度极度另类 | 免费大片黄手机在线观看 | 免费区欧美一级毛片精品 | heyzo北条麻妃久久 | 日韩视频免费一区二区三区 | 国产在视频线精品视频二代 | 国产jk福利视频在线观看 | 国产在线精品福利一区二区三区 | 久色一区| 中文字幕在线无限2021 | 亚洲高清在线视频 | a毛片免费全部播放完整成 a毛片免费全部在线播放毛 | 在线观看日本亚洲一区 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 日韩一区二区久久久久久 | 德国女人一级毛片免费 | 午夜国产高清精品一区免费 | 午夜a毛片 | 亚洲欧美日韩在线一区二区三区 | 一及毛片 | 久久精品视频9 | 免费观看成为人视频 | 成在线人永久免费播放视频 | 国产成人精品免费视频大全可播放的 | 国产成人丝袜网站在线观看 | 亚洲美女性视频 | 久久亚洲欧洲日产国码 | 成人免费xxxxx在线视频 | 337p粉嫩日本亚洲大胆艺术照 | 在线视频三区 | 精品中文字幕久久久久久 |