久久亚洲国产成人影院-久久亚洲国产的中文-久久亚洲国产高清-久久亚洲国产精品-亚洲图片偷拍自拍-亚洲图色视频

US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
Opinion / Opinion Line

Demolition of university building causes dilemma for local officials

(China Daily) Updated: 2016-09-13 07:53

Demolition of university building causes dilemma for local officials

People flock to the cherry blossom garden in Wuhan University on the first day it began selling tickets in Wuhan city, capital of Central China's Hubei province, March 21, 2014. [Photo/icpress.cn]

THE MAIN TEACHING BUILDING OF Wuhan University in Central China's Hubei province was demolished with explosives on Friday. Media reports quoted local officials as saying they demolished the building as it spoiled the scenic surroundings of nearby East Lake. Southern Metropolis Daily commented:

The building, designed by architect He Jingtang, was built in 1997 at the cost of 100 million yuan ($14.9 million) and put into use in 2000. It won several national architecture awards, including the top award for architecture, the Luban Award.

Yet the building was demolished at the cost of 13 million yuan. That's a huge waste of taxpayers' money, because Wuhan University is a public university, funded by the State.

Moreover, the incident is a legal matter. Let's have a look at the nation's Circular Economy Promotion Law, which requires urban governments and the owners of buildings to take measures to maintain them and lengthen their service life. The law also forbids local governments to demolish buildings within their service lives unless it is in the public's interest.

Obviously, demolishing the university building breaks the law. In order to defend themselves, the officials offered the excuse that the building was so high that it exceeded the height limits for buildings around the East Lake. They even said that the building has "ruined the scenery of East Lake".

That's a rather weak excuse and a ridiculous defense. As early as the 1980s, East Lake was listed in the national plan for ecological tourism, and the building was constructed later than that. If the building went against that plan, why did the officials not intervene when they started building it? Why were they silent in 1996 and then have the building demolished 20 years later?

Officials in Wuhan now face a dilemma. If they insist the demolished building had problems, the officials who approved its construction in 1996 should be held answerable. If the building did not break any planning restrictions and there was no justification for the demolition, those who decided to demolish it should pay for their deeds. Something illegal has happened and taxpayers' money has been wasted, and we hope to make clear who is responsible.

Most Viewed Today's Top News
...
主站蜘蛛池模板: 成人18网站 | 成人爽a毛片在线视频网站 成人爽爽大片在线观看 | 极品美女户外勾搭无套 | 欧美a级毛片免费播敢 | 无限观看社区在线视频 | 亚洲三级a | 精品国产视频在线观看 | 亚洲精品欧美日韩 | 一区二区影视 | 日韩精品国产一区 | 国产成人免费全部网站 | 色综合久久久久久 | 色多多最新地址福利地址 | 日韩美三级 | 97超级碰碰碰久久久观看 | 亚洲视频免费在线 | 在线播放免费一级毛片欧美 | 免费人成网站在线播放 | 成人免费看www网址入口 | 国产a级三级三级三级 | 久草在线视频精品 | 2022日韩理论片在线观看 | 亚洲成人一区 | 黄色一级片在线看 | 嫩草一区二区三区四区乱码 | 亚洲rct中文字幕在线 | 欧美日韩在线视频 | 自拍偷拍图区 | 91亚洲精品一区二区福利 | 免费人成网站免费看视频 | 老司机深夜影院入口aaaa | avtom影院入口永久在线观看 | www.一区| 免费一级毛片在级播放 | 亚洲国产日韩欧美一区二区三区 | 欧美α一级毛片 | 欧美日韩不卡在线 | 久色视频在线观看 | 一区二区三区在线观看免费 | 午夜一级毛片看看 | 久久一日本道色综合久久m 久久伊人成人网 |