www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

Improve talent evaluation, check brain drain

By Xiong Bingqi | China Daily | Updated: 2017-04-22 09:00

Improve talent evaluation, check brain drain

ZHAI HAIJUN/CHINA DAILY

Some recent media reports said a Chinese youth, whose family spent about 4 million yuan ($581,000) on his education in the United States over eight years, returned home only to realize he might not be able to earn that amount back because it was not easy for him to find a well-paying job.

So, is studying abroad still a worthwhile option for Chinese youths?

The answer differs from person to person, because to study abroad is a personal choice, and entails rational planning.

But education is more than just about economic returns. Education authorities must recognize this fact before reaching a conclusion from the above example (and similar cases) that China's brain drain can be checked.

Many Chinese families send their children to study abroad because they care more about the quality of education in developed countries than economic returns, even though the latter is also important.

Therefore, if China wants to check the outflow of young talents-let alone attract talents from abroad to its schools-it should first intensify reforms to improve the quality of education in the country.

Statistics show that from the late 1970s, when China launched its reform and opening-up, to last year, about 4.58 million Chinese went to study abroad, and 3.22 million of them returned home.

But despite the high percentage of returnees, the "outflow" of students continues to intensify. According to the Ministry of Education, 545,000 Chinese went abroad to study in 2016, up 36.26 percent compared with the figure in 2012, with about 70 percent of them seeking bachelor's, master's or doctoral degrees.

More students are returning from abroad mainly because of their falling academic and practical knowledge.

Ten years ago, most Chinese youths went abroad, mostly to developed countries, to seek college degrees, especially postgraduate degrees, and many of them chose to stay after graduation because the job market there could absorb them.

Nowadays, however, many Chinese students studying abroad are actually not "qualified"; they seek overseas degrees because their families "buy" them seats in cash-thirsty schools. No wonder it is difficult for such youths to find good jobs abroad or, after they return home, in China.

Official data show that 87 percent of the science and engineering graduates, talents that China needs the most, stay abroad, making China the largest "brain" exporter in the world.

In other words, real talents make up only a very small percentage of the returnees. And the high number of students returning from abroad does not necessarily mean that education, careers and the business environment in China have become more attractive compared with developed countries. So, one should not conclude that studying abroad is no longer worth it.

Good students still have a strong desire to pursue the best education in the world. In contrast, some wealthy families don't care whether their children are eligible to study abroad because they have the money to spare and want their children to just have the overseas study experience. But such graduates cannot win the recognition of the market or society.

Treating people according to their "identity", instead of their knowledge and capability, is an outdated concept. Some second-rate graduates from top universities in China may not be even half as good as an average graduate from an average school for the job market.

The education authorities must realize that even if studying abroad does not translate into good jobs at home, many Chinese parents are still willing to send their children overseas for higher education.

The outdated talent evaluation system and not-so-perfect quality of education in China are prompting parents to send their children to study abroad. And until the quality of education is improved and the academic environment changed, the brain drain will continue.

The author is a columnist for Beijing Youth Daily. The article was first published in the newspaper on April 19.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 男女性高清爱潮视频免费观看 | 亚洲高清视频网站 | 国产精品久久久免费视频 | 精品国产成人综合久久小说 | 久久永久免费 | 99久久精品国产片久人 | 草草草在线观看 | 国产成人精品视频免费大全 | 在线毛片观看 | 男人的亚洲天堂 | 亚洲综合视频在线观看 | 成人在线精品视频 | 欧美日韩精品国产一区在线 | 国产性生交xxxxx免费 | 亚洲精品国产精品国自产 | 久久国产成人午夜aⅴ影院 久久国产成人亚洲精品影院老金 | 亚洲成人免费网址 | 黄色网址国产 | 欧美经典成人在观看线视频 | 亚洲欧美日韩国产 | 成人毛片全部免费观看 | 免费视频精品一区二区三区 | 国产亚洲精品高清在线 | 欧美极品在线视频 | 国产中文字幕在线观看 | 中文一区二区在线观看 | 免费国产黄网站在线观看视频 | 女人张开腿让男人插 | 热99re久久精品香蕉 | 韩国福利一区 | 日韩伦理一区二区三区 | 欧美一区二区三区免费高 | 伊人久久大香线焦在观看 | 九九九精品视频 | 2022国产精品手机在线观看 | 日本大黄网站 | 日韩欧美在线播放视频 | 99视频国产在线 | 欧美一级特黄aa大片视频 | 免费一看一级欧美 | 亚洲欧美在线免费 |