www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Opinion Line

Draft on govt info disclosure too vague

China Daily | Updated: 2017-06-20 07:48

Draft on govt info disclosure too vague

Chinese Premier Li Keqiang speaks at the Central Urban Work Conference in Beijing, Dec 22, 2015.[Photo/Xinhua]

A DRAFT AMENDMENT to the 2008 regulation on government information disclosure has been issued by the State Council, China's Cabinet, to solicit public opinions. Southern Metropolis Daily commented on Monday:

It is praiseworthy that the draft does not shun questions over the increasing public calls for government information and the obligation of government organs to disclose it.

The constant disclosure "tussle" between people who want to know more about local governance and civil servants wary of divulging sensitive information has, in fact, found expression in the making and revision of relevant legal codes.

That explains why the latest draft reiterates the principle that government information disclosure should be the norm and nondisclosure exceptional. For that to have teeth, legislative revisions are needed to clarify what is eligible for disclosure and what is not.

There should be little controversy over the information subject to specially designed laws and regulations that is not to be made public under any circumstances. On the other hand, government information that risks "endangering national security, economic security, and social stability", yet can be disclosed in the appropriate circumstances, is often inaccessible.

The draft amendment is right to clarify that the disclosure, if deemed by same-level local governments as a potential threat to public security and social stability or the implementation of key financial policies, will not have to be made.

The vague wording and the lack of concrete criteria, however, may leave room for government departments not to make public information that they should. What constitutes potential security threats and the same-level governments' authority in deciding what to disclose, is not set out clearly enough to convince people that the right to withhold critical information is not being abused. Public supervision of government may be kept at bay in this way.

Making public government information is now a step that cannot be taken back. The disclosure of government information may be better decided by the top legislative body, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, rather than the governments themselves.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美三级不卡在线观看视频 | 亚洲综合久久久久久中文字幕 | 亚洲手机看片 | 亚洲制服欧美自拍另类 | 色涩五月天 | 麻豆第一页 | 亚洲欧美在线精品一区二区 | 久久亚洲不卡一区二区 | 黄色福利站 | 国产三级在线观看免费 | 精品一区二区三区免费视频 | 网站在线看 | 欧美精品久久 | 三级亚洲 | 久草在线视频资源 | 高清一级淫片a级中文字幕 高清一区二区 | 国产精品九九免费视频 | 亚洲精品久久久久综合91 | 美国一级片在线观看 | 欧美怡红院免费全视频 | 欧美黑大粗硬毛片视频 | 美女日韩在线观看视频 | a级毛片免费观看在线播放 a级毛片免费看 | 欧美一区二区在线观看视频 | 九九精品在线观看 | 精品极品三级久久久久 | 成人做爰视频www在线观看 | 亚洲欧美日韩精品在线 | 国产在线精品观看一区 | 欧美同性videos在线可播放 | 99久久精品免费看国产四区 | 亚洲 欧美 激情 另类 自拍 | 国产成人精品免费视频大全办公室 | 亚洲涩涩精品专区 | 色樱桃影院亚洲精品影院 | 91精品久久久久 | 日韩乱码中文字幕视频 | 亚洲男人天 | 日韩欧美国产另类 | 色综合久久88色综合天天小说 | 萌白酱粉嫩jk福利在线观看 |