www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

America

US Congress passes Iraq pullout bill

(AP)
Updated: 2007-04-27 05:55
Large Medium Small

WASHINGTON - In a bold wartime challenge to President Bush, the Democratic-controlled US Congress cleared legislation Thursday to begin withdrawal of US troops from Iraq by Oct. 1 with a goal of a complete pullout six months later. The White House dismissed the legislation as "dead before arrival."

US Congress passes Iraq pullout bill
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev., second from left, gestures during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, April 26, 2007, to urge President Bush to sign the war funding bill just passed by Congress. From left are, war veteran John Bruhns, Reid, Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., and war veteran Jeremy Broussard. [AP]
US Congress passes Iraq pullout bill
The 51-46 vote was largely along party lines, and like House passage a day earlier it underscored that the war's congressional opponents are far short of the two-thirds majority needed to override a Bush veto.

Democrats marked Thursday's final passage with a news conference during which they repeatedly urged Bush to reconsider his veto threat. "This bill for the first time gives the president of the United States an exit strategy" from Iraq, said Rep. David Obey of Wisconsin.

The legislation is "in keeping with what the American people want," added Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada.

The White House was unmoved. "The president's determined to win in Iraq. I think the bill that they sent us today is mission defeated," said deputy press secretary Dana Perino. "This bill is dead before arrival."

Given that standoff, Republicans and Democrats alike already were maneuvering for position on a follow-up bill.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell dismissed the just-passed legislation as "political posturing" by Democrats that deserves the veto it will receive. "The solution is simple: Take out the surrender date, take out the pork and get the funds to our troops," he said.

The bill would provide $124.2 billion, more than $90 billion of which would go for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Democrats added billions more for domestic programs, and while most of the debate focused on the troop withdrawal issue, some of the extra spending also has drawn Bush's criticism.

The day's developments amounted to a landmark of sorts.

The vote occurred nearly four years after Bush stood on the deck of an aircraft carrier before a banner that read "Mission Accomplished" - and 113 days after Democrats took power in Congress and vowed to change course in a war that has cost the lives of more than 3,300 US troops.

During Vietnam, a longer and far deadlier war for US forces, Congress went years before it was able to agree on legislation significantly challenging presidential war policy.

In the current case, any veto override attempt would occur in the House, and even Democrats concede they lack the votes to prevail.

With House Speaker Nancy Pelosi at his side, Reid said Democrats hoped to have a follow-up war-funding bill ready for the president's signature by June 1. Despite administration claims to the contrary, he said that was soon enough to prevent serious disruption in military operations.

Several Democratic officials have said they expect the next measure will jettison the withdrawal timetable, a concession to Bush. At the same time, they say they hope to include standards for the Iraqi government to meet on issues such as expanding democratic participation and allocating oil resources.

Bush and congressional Republicans, eager to signal the public that they do not support an open-ended commitment to Iraq, have both embraced these so-called benchmarks. Unlike Democrats, they generally oppose using benchmarks to require specific actions, such as troop withdrawals.

Rep. John Boehner of Ohio, the House Republican leader, said at a news conference that the purpose of benchmarks should be to "see how the Iraqi government is doing," rather than to establish deadlines for a troop withdrawal.

Opinion on the issue covered a wide spectrum. "The only good measure that exists in Iraq now is body counts, and that's not a very good measure," said Sen. Mark Pryor of Arkansas, a moderate Democrat.

Congress acted as the top US military commander in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus, said at a Pentagon news conference that the US mission "may get harder before it gets easier."

Less than three months after Bush announced an increase in troop strength and a shift in tactics, Petraeus said improvements were evident in both Baghdad and the Anbar Province in western Iraq. At the same time, he said the accomplishments "have not come without sacrifice" and that greater American losses have resulted from increased car bombings and suicide attacks, plus the greater concentration of US troops among the Iraqi population.

There were no surprises in the Senate vote, in which 48 Democrats and one independent joined Republicans Gordon Smith of Oregon and Chuck Hagel of Nebraska in supporting the bill. Sen. Joseph Lieberman, a Connecticut independent who typically votes with the Democrats, sided with 45 Republicans in opposition.

In a clear warning to the White House, Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, opposed the legislation but issued a statement saying her patience with the war was limited.

"If the president's new strategy does not demonstrate significant results by August, then Congress should consider all options including a redefinition of our mission and a gradual but significant withdrawal of our troops next year," she said. Like Hagel and Smith, Collins is coming up on a 2008 re-election campaign.

Democrats have long argued that Republicans must choose between a politically unpopular war on the one hand and a president of their own party on the other.

The legislation requires a troop withdrawal to begin July 1 if Bush cannot certify that the Iraqi government is making progress in disarming militias, reducing sectarian violence and forging political agreements, otherwise by Oct. 1.

While the beginning of a withdrawal is mandated, the balance of the pullback is merely advisory, to take place by April 1, 2008.

Troops could remain after that date to conduct counterterrorism missions, protect US facilities and personnel and train Iraqi security forces.

The war aside, Democrats included more than $10 billion in the legislation that Bush did not ask for. Included was $3.5 billion for the victims of Hurricane Katrina; $2.3 billion for homeland security and smaller amounts for rural schools, firefighting, children's health care and other programs.

分享按鈕
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲精品久久精品h成人 | 中国a级淫片免费播放 | 国产一级一级一级成人毛片 | 福利视频99 | 黄色三级网站在线观看 | 亚洲国产精品一区二区久 | 欧美色xxx | 欧美日韩国产在线观看一区二区三区 | 亚洲欧美日韩精品永久在线 | 久久国产中文字幕 | 国产精品久久久久久久 | 亚洲天堂网在线播放 | 日本高清乱偷www | 99在线热视频只有精品免费 | 国产精品爱久久久久久久小 | 一级欧美激情毛片 | 欧美亚洲黄色 | 好看的看黄a大片爽爽影院 好男人天堂网 | 欧美视频亚洲视频 | 中文字幕亚洲精品 | 亚洲国产日韩综合久久精品 | 九九免费精品视频 | 国产91成人 | 日本www色视频成人免费网站 | 一区二区国产在线观看 | 亚洲精品国产一区二区三区在 | 一区二区免费看 | 亚洲欧美日韩精品久久亚洲区色播 | 国产精品所毛片视频 | 亚洲免费一级视频 | aaa在线观看高清免费 | 日本毛片在线看 | 伊人色在线视频 | 老色99久久九九精品尤物 | 美女黄色免费在线观看 | 欧美成人性做爰 | 国产在线视频精品视频免费看 | 欧美成人精品一区二区 | 亚州久久| 欧美精品成人一区二区视频一 | 亚洲精品国产精品精 |