www射-国产免费一级-欧美福利-亚洲成人福利-成人一区在线观看-亚州成人

WORLD> Europe
Analysis: What can Europe do to relieve US crisis?
(chinadaily.com.cn)
Updated: 2008-10-03 16:08

With the recent Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, the US government is calling on foreign governments and central banks to help bail out troubled American financial institutions, in a joint endeavor to safeguard financial stability around the globe. Yet “none of the other six G-7 members will adopt a similar program to the US”, said, eer Steinbrück, the German Finance Minister, at a teleconference among G-7 finance ministers and central bank governors on September 22.

As allies of the United States, why did Europe refuse to join the rescue plan? The answer would be clear if we look into the economic, currency and political connections among EU members.

-- EU member states have difficulty in joining the rescue

Firstly, significant EU-level decisions can only be made with consensus among all member states, which now comprise 27. Such a decision-making mechanism makes EU a miniature “United Nations”, where consensus is difficult to reach such as whether EU member states should participate in the rescue, where to find the huge funding source for the bailout, what plan to carry through, and how EU member states share the rescue cost. This left barely any probability for a joint EU bailout. Meanwhile, the 3 percent budget deficit ceiling and 60 percent public debt ceiling set in the Maastricht Treaty also constrained EU's ability to join in the rescue.

Related readings:
 France, Germany clash over US-style rescue package
 McCain struggles with support for bailout bill
 US Congress closer to endorsing bailout
 US Senate passes $700B "sweetened" rescue package

Secondly, although EU as a whole has become a larger economy than the US', the European Central Bank and member countries have no need to hold huge foreign exchange reserves, given their currency integration in the Eurozone. By the end of July 2008, the ECB's foreign exchange reserves registered just US$62.9 billion, and reserves of all Eurozone countries added up to a mere US$555.1 billion, most of which reserved for the settlement of international trade and financial transactions. Barely any reserves are available for the US bailout program.

Moreover, as the financial crisis rippled to Europe, EU members have shifted the focus of their policies toward domestic financial stability. Europe's banking sector has recently seen lingering crises; Belgium, UK, Germany and France have been forced to recapitalize their banks, such as Fortis, Northern Rock and others. Analyses suggest that Europe's banking sector will face tremendous refinancing pressure in the two years to come, as Europe's 30 biggest financial institutions see their one-trillion-plus dollars of debts due in the coming 15 months. European governments and ECB are running out of wits just keeping themselves out of the turmoil.

-- Measures that EU may take

First, the EU can pressure the US government to assume the responsibility and get the bailout plan approved the soonest possible, in order to prevent further contagion of the financial crisis. Second, EU member states will take decisive actions to avoid impact from the crisis.

With its currency system and political structures, the EU is unable to take a joint action in response to a Europe-wide financial crisis. As an example, the German Finance Minister Peer Steinbrück disagreed with a 300-billion-euro rescue package for the banking sector proposed by his French counterpart Christine Lagarde, who later denied the plan. Therefore, to halt the contagion, all member states have taken rapid and bold measures against potential domestic crises, including partially nationalizing troubled financial institutions through recapitalization from government budgets, and fully guaranteeing the debts of major financial institutions (the Irish model).

In history, EU countries have not shunned government intervention and nationalization of private companies, or government guarantee for financial institutions. Successful cases include the bailout of Credit Lyonnais by the French government in the 1980s, and the temporary nationalization of troubled financial institutions in Nordic countries in the 1990s. Therefore, EU countries will mainly employ these measures when they have to rescue their troubled institutions.

Third, financial rescue programs in different EU members will influence each other, or even force governments to take similar actions respectively. On September 30, to prevent a bank-run, the Irish government announced its plan to guarantee all debts of six major domestic banks. This move certainly stabilized the domestic credit market, but because of the free cross-border flow of cash, it would also draw depositors and borrowers from other EU members, creating an unfair advantage for Irish financial institutions. Other member states, while negotiating with Ireland, promptly launched protective actions. For example, UK, to assure depositors, raised the threshold for guaranteed deposits from £35,000 to £50,000.

In a word, with each member state merely capable of protecting themselves against the contagion of crisis, EU has more sympathy than remedy to offer for the ongoing American financial crisis.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 最新日韩欧美不卡一二三区 | 国产uv1区二区三区 国产va免费精品高清在线观看 | 欧美一a级做爰 | 亚洲天堂久久精品成人 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区在线播放 | 美女视频免费永久观看的 | 日本一极毛片兔费看 | 一区二区精品视频 | 日本免费视 | 久久久久久色 | 99视频国产精品 | 亚洲日韩中文字幕在线播放 | 一级黄色欧美片 | 欧洲色老头 | 欧美线在线精品观看视频 | 手机看片福利永久 | 久操影视 | 成人午夜精品久久不卡 | 欧美一级免费看 | 99精品福利视频 | 精品免费久久久久欧美亚一区 | 亚洲欧美日韩国产一区二区精品 | 精品400部自拍视频在线播放 | 精品国产一二三区 | 欧美a大片 | 毛片久久 | 久久久久久久综合色一本 | 午夜刺激爽爽视频免费观看 | 在线观看二区三区午夜 | 99视频精品免视3 | 狠狠色丁香久久婷婷综 | 久久a热6| 正在播放亚洲一区 | 亚洲aⅴ | 国产精品a人片在线观看 | 欧美成人观看视频在线 | 超级乱淫视频aⅴ播放视频 超级碰碰碰在线观看 | 欧美一级毛片免费大全 | 日日噜噜噜夜夜爽爽狠狠69 | 午夜美女网站 | 222aaa免费国产在线观看 |